punkmed

Ryan - minor - he/him/his - bisexual - stealth ftm - transmedicalist - pro dysphoric nb - exclusionist - anti mogai - anti neopronouns - anti pansexual

[dykesdebate]

Note: because this post was originally posted on Instagram, the cropping and/or format may look award when viewing on tumblr

[crockettmarcel]

okay hear me out

so according to inclusionists, it is possible to be an ace lesbian bc you’re romantically attracted to women, or bi-ace bc you experience romantic attraction to both genders etc

however when it comes to straight aces the requirements suddenly change, and you have to be both romantically and sexually attracted to the opposite gender to be considered straight

anyone see where I’m going with this?

the double standard is, at best, confusing, and at worst damaging. what applies to one person in terms of identity must apply to another (in this context at least)

if you claim that you have to experience sexual + romantic attraction to the opposite gender to be straight, then by that logic you also have to experience sexual + romantic attraction to the same gender to be considered gay/bi

to be honest, it just seems like a halfhearted attempt on inclusionists’ part to worm their way into a community where they don’t belong. words have meanings and you can’t change them to fit your agenda

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

Ignoring, or don’t even understand.

[homo-sex-shoe-whale]

Pedophiles: We’re part of the LGBT+ community too!

The community:

[bqbbw]

Pedophilia never has been, and never will be part of the LGBTQIA+ community.

[anotherbasicrachel]

THIS BLOG IS A NO PEDO ZONE.

IF YOUR A PEDOPHILE, LEAVE, AMD NEVER RETURN, YOU DICKHEAD.

[homo-sex-shoe-whale]

MY BLOG IS A NO PEDO ZONE TOO

IF YOU’RE A PEDOPHILE WHO CREEPS ON PEOPLE ONLINE, PLEASE STRONGLY CONSIDER TELEPORTING YOURSELF TO MARS

[transmedbowser-deactivated20200]

You know what I love?

“Progressive” artists that draw ‘non binary’ characters but obviously drawing them as a woman with a big chest, big hips, calling them “nb woman” and to top it all off making them lesbian.

And the best thing of it all?

They get fucking praised for it.

That shit is giving me massive dysphoria. I dont know why artists like that get praised for shit like that.

[punk-med]

it’s so insulting to actual non-binary people i feel bad for y’all it’s disgusting

[dilutedd]

also what the FUCK is up with inclusionists responding to “aces aren’t oppressed” with their trauma. please fucking stop, trauma is not oppression, oppression is not anecdotal no matter how traumatic, and it’s potentially very fucking triggering for someone when you just lay all your trauma out on the table in order to “win” an argument

[poplinn]

Some pride flags I made using TF2′s paint colours! I didn’t do all flags because due to the limit of colours available some flags just turned out weird. Feel free to use! Credit not needed but appreciated!

Reference used

[punk-med]

op where is the bisexual flag? the lesbian flag?

[whitepeopletwitter]

[yiffscourse]

you literally cannot have both

[transmedbowser-deactivated20200]

Yall got my outfit for next pride ready 😳👊🏻

[toothless-transmed]

[transmedbowser-deactivated20200]

Too bad

[toothless-transmed]

OP: 🤡

[funnzipper]

[transmedbowser-deactivated20200]

Yall really out here ignoring the best part,

[lavenderfables]

Plants are just like… Too much sun. Not enough sun. Ground too wet. Ground too dry. The pH balance is wrong. There’s not enough drainage. I don’t like terracotta. Feed me. Stop feeding me. God was killed here. I do not vibe with this soil.

[nerdgul]

then plants in nature be like… OWO .. is that a crack in the concrete?

[an-alien-friend]

Hot take of the day: Lesbians can say fag/faggot

[ithelpstodream]

[official-transsexual]

Anyone who claims TERFs care about protecting lesbians is either a liar or an absolute fool

Fake ‘radical feminist’ group a paid political front for anti-LGBT organization

WoLF, an anti-transgender group that positions itself as being pro-women and pro-choice, is secretly funded by Kim Davis' lawyers...

The rise of anti-trans “radical” feminists, explained

Christian Right tips to fight transgender rights: separate the T from the LGB

Last week, from Thursday, October 13 through Saturday, October 15 the anti-LGBT hate group Family Research Council put on its annual Values

[tealesbian]

not to reiterate what people have been saying on twitter but it is imperative that we recognize that this is not a mistake this was a very intentional decision that was made. the us demolished the lives and stability of the entire middle east intentionally and continues to terrorize the people in these countries intentionally. this is the us imperialist war machine doing exactly what it was designed to do. this is america doing exactly what it has always done.

[queerpyracy]

baffling how much of this site is just conservative protestantism with a gay hat

[queerpyracy]

you know what i’m in just enough of a bad mood that i’m ready to nail my grievances to the church door so let’s fucking go

black and white morality wherein anyone who doesn’t believe/think/live exactly as I do is a dirty sinner Problematic and probably a predatory monster

everyone is a sinner Problematic but true believers people who activist the right way according to my worldview are still better than everyone else, and I will act in accordance to this belief in my own superiority to let everyone else know I’m better than them because I found Jesus am the most woke

casual and fucking omnipresent equations of womanhood with softness/goodness/purity/nurturing to remind every woman who isn’t/doesn’t want to be any of those things that they’re doing it wrong

aggressive desexualization (particularly of women’s sexuality, to the point where it may as well not exist at all) accompanied by pastels [not a criticism directed ace ppl having a right to sex-free content and spaces but specifically targeted at a wider problem resulting from the previous point]

YOU’RE VALID AND JESUS LOVES YOU and neither of these platitudes achieves a goddamn thing

historical context is for people who care about nuance and we don’t have time for either (see: black and white morality)

lots of slogans and quotes and nice little soundbites to memorize but does anybody actually study the source material with a critical eye to make their own informed analysis

the answer is no

I’ve been to bible study groups don’t @ me I know what the fuck I’m talking about

Good Christians™ Nice Gays™ don’t fraternize with/let themselves be influenced by non-Christians those terrible queers

all the media one consumes must be ideologically pure or it will surely harm the children

it is Our Sacred Duty to protect the children from Everything, thus ensuring their innocence/purity/etc until such time as they are idk probably 25 years old

literally just “think of the children” moral panic y’all can fuckin miss me with that

people who don’t conform to the dominant thinking WILL be excommunicated/driven from the social group, and any wrong treatment they suffer will be seen as a justified consequence of their wrong thinking

I Saw Goody Proctor With The Devil And She Had A Bad Steven Universe Headcanon

[kmclaude]

Thank you for breaking it down like that because so many of us have been saying it but to see a play by play breakdown comparison is just…Thank you.

[jumpingjacktrash]

sipping tea and judging people as a group bonding activity

[curlicuecal]

oh, man, speaking as a queer Christian who gets regular tumblr flashbacks to my childhood in the Bible Belt, YES

-belief that small snippets of text can be analyzed out context to understand the whole work/ judge the whole person -Desire for moral choices to be easy/ black-and-white leads to belief that it is possible to find a one-size-fits all answer to every situation -Literal, rather than literary analysis, with weird fixation on etymological roots that have nothing to do with source material -Belief that there is “one true interpretation” that is self-evident and will be understood by everyone encountering the same material regardless of background -Overwhelming, internalized sense of culpability for other people’s actions/integrity/souls -Overwhelming, internalized sense of personal guilt -Pressure to evangelize aggressively -Tendency to value broad ideals before individual needs -Hostility towards coexistence/tolerance/neutrality -Hostility towards lack of consensus in viewpoint -Knowledge as contamination -Guilt/contamination by proximity -Fixation on the sexual as uniquely dirty/sinful -Belief in “thought crimes” -Argumentation via appeal to higher authority/feelings of revulsion rather than internal, verbalizeable logic -“conversations” that are actually stealth soapboxes because one side isn’t actually interested in listening -“polite requests” that are actually commands because “no” is not considered an acceptable answer -in-group language -virtue-signaling and hostility towards the outgroup -gatekeeping -communities strongly built around the idea of being the world’s underdog -appropriation of other people’s persecution/victimization -treating the concept of oppression like a trophy -glorification/fetishization of victimhood

[cowardly-bisexual]

Points that apply to pansexuality:

let everyone else know I’m better than them because I found Jesus am the most woke (i created a new label that centers around acknowledging that trans/nb people exist and i would fuck them)

aggressive desexualization (hearts not parts)

historical context is for people who care about nuance and we don’t have time for either (thinking we need a new label for nb/trans inclusive bisexuality instead of learning that the bisexual community has always defined bisexuality this way)

Good Christians™ Nice Gays™ don’t fraternize with/let themselves be influenced by non-Christians those terrible queers (”bisexuality and pansexuality are not the same thing!!!!”)

people who don’t conform to the dominant thinking WILL be excommunicated/driven from the social group, and any wrong treatment they suffer will be seen as a justified consequence of their wrong thinking (”OP is a panphobe”)

Literal, rather than literary analysis, with weird fixation on etymological roots that have nothing to do with source material (bi means two pan means all)

Desire for moral choices to be easy (”stop calling out pansexuals, let’s just get along, any label is valid as long as it makes you feel good”)

Fixation on the sexual as uniquely dirty/sinful (again hearts not parts, “i don’t care about body/looks, i only see your personality”)

Argumentation via appeal to higher authority/feelings of revulsion rather than internal, verbalizeable logic  (”pansexuality just feels better as a label, idk why”)

virtue-signaling (”i’m pansexual because i would fuck a trans/nb person”, “i’m pansexual because don’t see gender”)

communities strongly built around the idea of being the world’s underdog (”why were pansexuals not included in this post about bisexuality/gay stuff!!”)

[deianiradiscourse]

Tucutes stop posting in the transmed tag challenge

(Posting in the tucute tag to try and get the message into tucute circles)

Also stop posting anti-transmed shit in the transmed positivity tag