scout. 21. she/they/it/he.
i like games, horror movies, books, manga, marine life, and a variety of other things! i basically just reblog stuff :)
dni: transphobic, racist, zionist, homophobic, bigoted of any kind.
Xuebing Du
Mike Driver
Cosimo Galluzzi

pixel skylines
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

@theartofmadeline

shark vs the universe

JBB: An Artblog!

JVL

ellievsbear
Cosmic Funnies
Peter Solarz
art blog(derogatory)
Show & Tell
Sade Olutola
Acquired Stardust

roma★
Keni
Misplaced Lens Cap

Kiana Khansmith
seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@scootaur
scout. 21. she/they/it/he.
i like games, horror movies, books, manga, marine life, and a variety of other things! i basically just reblog stuff :)
dni: transphobic, racist, zionist, homophobic, bigoted of any kind.
watched backrooms on thursday and i've been gnawing on a few things since then. mainly, why pirate clark (PC) started eating clark. i have a lot of thoughts about what PC "is" but for brevity's sake, we'll say that he's a reflection of clark's true self and a manifestation of the backrooms. i feel like it's been pretty accepted now that the base reason why PC starting eating clark is because he was mimicking his actions in eating the still lifes, but the reason he did it then (and became aggravated during the interaction) was bothering me a bit.
so i had the idea that it was because clark had finally fully rejected the idea/possibility of change. the backrooms is constantly changing and PC, as a "creation" or "manifestation" of the backrooms would have an innate desire or capacity for change within him but clark telling him that (paraphrasing) "it's okay, she said we don't have to change, we can just stay the same" grates against his innate nature.
there's also the aspect of clark saying he feels at home in the backrooms, like it's where he's meant to be and he really understands it, etc., but then he goes on to say he doesn't want to change and that he doesn't have the capacity for it, which goes against the core thesis of the backrooms. by him rejecting change, he's (if unknowingly) rejecting everything that makes the backrooms, the backrooms. so in turn, the backrooms (through PC) reject him.
and there is also an aspect of him seeking stagnancy and permanence within the backrooms, shown through him "settling" there and making a "home" for himself there, drawing a map and expecting it all to stay the same. him claiming it as "his house," trying to control it and wrangle it into something containable and understandable for him. but his ideas of stagnancy are entirely antithetical to the backrooms, so when he tells PC that they can stay the same and never change, he's telling PC that he doesn't belong there and PC acts accordingly
i could be your pet rock. id be very good at it
ive had some time to think and honestly i dont think id be a very good pet rock. i dont know what i was thinking. theres too much anger in me
Henry Clerval
"Can any man be to me as Clerval was?"
chat I miss him and I am so sad Henry wasn't included in the new GDT Frankenstein :( but anyway take this
incest in frankenstein is not always literal but often manifests through the merging of roles--for example, caroline makes elizabeth into an extension of herself, shaping her into a replacement maternal figure who then becomes victor's bride. caroline's actions suggest a deferred form of incestuous desire (particularly when considering victor's nightmare where elizabeth turns into caroline and he kisses her)--she does not act on it herself but instead uses elizabeth as an intermediary, crafting her in her own image and ensuring she remains within the family unit as both daughter, sister and wife. in doing so, elizabeth not only fulfills the role of wife to victor but also the role of wife to alphonse, as she becomes his quote "more than daughter." given this history, victor's act of creation becomes more than just a scientific endeavor--it is, in a sense, an unconscious repetition of the generational cycle of misplaced desire. victor talks about his creature during the creation process in ways that strongly resemble euphemisms for sexual transgression (as much as people who favor the creature-as-son interpretation don’t like to acknowledge this): he describes a night of feverish anticipation, bodily toil, and an act of creation or "birth" conducted in solitude, followed by overwhelming regret and self-loathing the moment he sees what hes done. there is, too, the same blurring of boundaries between victor and the creature that is a running theme within the rest of the frankensteins: creator and created, parent and child, self and other. victor's disgust at his creature, then, is twofold: he is repulsed by its monstrous form, yes, but he is also repulsed by what it represents--his own participation in perpetuating an ongoing legacy of psuedo-incest. when the creature demands a mate, this dynamic becomes more pronounced. the creature essentially asks victor to complete the incestuous cycle by providing him with a bride, a second creature formed in the same manner, what would technically be the creature's sister; victor's destruction of the female creature suggests an almost violent reaction to his own subconscious recognition of the pattern he is repeating. it is significant then that he chooses, though without realizing it, to break this cycle of abuse by refusing to comply to a marriage between siblings like his mother did to him and elizabeth.
hi heres the entire twilight movie as a stamp
"White Apathy"
The fact that this is 80 fucking years ago but still just as relevant is terrifying.
@lovesdaya
Kafka was so right fuck this stupid baka life
He didn’t say that.
yes he did
The stigma of self-inserts is so harmful to the creative process. Relax. Admit it. Everything you make is derivative of yourself, always, no exceptions. You can turn the mirror into tinier and tinier shards or you can make it as big as you want to reflect as much as you want. At the end of the day it's always going to show you inside of it. Pretending otherwise is stupid.