empiricallyoptimistic replied to your post “Would it be bad to tax unhealthy foods and subsidize healthier foods...”
It is- i.e. the WIC program is like food stamps for healthy food only, for families with young children. Many states also have a soda tax. Is it a good thing though? Why should choosing how you eat be a privilege for richer people? I'm not saying all possible measures like this are bad, just bringing up some nuance
that is definitely true, but currently choosing how you eat IS a privilege for richer people, who can afford Whole Foods/fresh stuff, organic stuff, etc, whereas a lot of the serious obesity and health problems in the US stem from lower income neighborhoods often only having cheap unhealthy food available, and lower income families buying more fast food and unhealthy stuff because it can cut down on costs and prep time.
I’m glad there are at least some programs in place to get healthy food to people who need it.
anyway in my knowledge, corn is heavily subsidized which leads to high fructose corn syrup being super cheap, and also unhealthy fed cows (who are just fed on corn stuff) being super cheap to raise, which is why fast food and sugary/syrupy foods are cheaper and more available. meanwhile fresh produce and fruits/veggies are hardly subsidized at all.
so like in socialism world it would be GREAT if choosing to eat unhealthy/healthy was a universal right but in some kinda “capitalism lite” america (which i feel like is feasible to achieve) i would super support making healthier fresher foods more available and i think a great way to do that would be to subsidize them using money from unhealthy shit that rich people buy?
I also have NO economic education and everything I learned about this was from a very biased documentary!! so I’m sorry!