he’s so 2020 georgenotfound royalty au fanart here
#interview with the vampire#iwtv#sam reid#jacob anderson#amc tvl

seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States

seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Belarus

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
seen from Singapore

seen from Yemen

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Türkiye
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Russia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
he’s so 2020 georgenotfound royalty au fanart here
I hate these sponsored posts
PEOPLE ARE PAYING TO PUT *DREAM* ON MY DASH
i dont think ive ever wanted to stomp on someones toes so bad
fingon:
gothmog:
fingon: h-
gothmog: vibe cheCK
I get pretty annoyed by that post of the classical sculpture of a nude woman with an iPhone crudely cropped in, saying that “these kinds of sculptures” were created for the male gaze, because... Well, have you ever looked at classical art? Ever? In your life?
There are STACKS of jacked, bison-balled, immodestly positioned males throughout Ancient Greek and Byzantine art. Man, did sculptors love to carve out big ol’ testicles. It was actually pretty rare for women to be sculpted completely in the nude, besides love or fertility goddesses like Aphrodite or Venus. Usually, due to modesty (yes, even the Greeks had some), female forms would wear their regular garb. Artemis, Hera, and Demeter were portrayed fully clothed in just about any artwork.
Many of the nude sculptures weren’t even young, slender forms. Check out Venus of Willendorf, the first image that’s thrown into your face when you take an obligatory Art History course. Big hips and breasts were just symbols of success in childbirth. The nudity was basically a symbol of their sex, not sexuality. Besides, if the Ancients were just creating a bunch of porn, I think they’d switch to an easier medium than chiseling granite. Like, say, doodling some boobies into the dirt with a stick. Try criticizing comic book artists’ works, not a historical artifact.
i hate all these grading scale posts where it's like "america is so terrible we're supposed to fail"
like no
have you ever heard of curves? other countries' grades kind of work like that. yeah, there are probably differences and they may not be equal, but they are all developed kind of the same way. average is STILL supposed to be average, but in places like the UK or Canada you're probably more likely to get more questions wrong because maybe the tests contain a wider array of knowledge at a higher level and they don't expect you to know it all.
so yeah, a 90 here is not the same as a 90 there. it doesn't mean the same thing, so don't simply transfer your number to another scale, it's not made for the same content.
Coming out to your parents as Fire/Fighting