Alysanne set Targaryen women back. Had she been less pussy watching her misogynist husband stealing their daughter and granddaughter crown in favor of men and just selling their daughters or sending them away like some rabid dogs (justice for Viserra!)… Oh and helping her brother to steal their sister’s crown (sister who damn near raised them). She pissed me off so bad, she’s going to hell with her nasty ass husband 🙏
Even though this is true in a real sense, and she hadn't been fair to her own daughters, even with Gael (when she reasonably had the more breadth to change after losing her other daughters) & even is responsible for one's death, I do also see how tirelessly she worked for women in Westeros, and they do have some form of protection from noblemen because of Alicent's "Queen's Laws" (right of 1st night abolished and the Widow's Law). These are meaningful acts, even though they had less impact on Targ women directly than they did on peasant folk and other noblewomen.
Two things can be true at once; she clearly had a lot of power with Jaehaerys but what she most wanted to do--to raise the female heir apparent and have Jaehaerys' naming a girl when that opportunity arose--she found that she hit Jaehaerys' limit(s), saw how little she could do to really negate his power as the king/really understood the consequences of what being a Queen consort meant in terms of the unequal powers and subservience, and I think she was compelled more and more down the years, without really realizing it consciously, to anticipate and shape her own actions, words, and plans around what she knew and felt he'd approve or allow. Which in turn affected how she'd view her daughters and how she'd arrange their lives.
We see how she's condescendingly treated by the maesters at Oldtown when she visits when she remarks that she'd like to see female maesters and how Jaehaerys never makes a comment to perhaps back her up. (Condescending because they obviously don't believe that women can be as smart as them even with one clearly being in front of their face; they probably thought of Alysanne as an exception.) ("Birth, Death , and Betrayal"):
It's quite obvious she felt more and more like she had no agency or control to do the actual things she wanted. I feel like there was most likely tiptoeing.
Yeah, Jaehaerys said to Viserra that he doesn't interfere with Alysanne's decisions concerning marriages...but he says TWICE that Viserra's marriage to Theomore Manderly would be extremely beneficial to "the Iron Throne" ("Policy, Progeny, and Pain"):
...Alysanne wasn't blind or deaf to this, she herself went North to convince Alaric Stark to be more amicable towards Jaehaerys and was involved in the deal of the New Gift. Alysanne was acting for Jaehaerys' interests and then seemed to justify the wrong by making as if Viserra was disrupting the harmony of the family Alysanne is supposed to have the higher authority over (again, note that she probably felt more of her authority & agency as illusory) as both the mother and the Queen Consort. Her decision to marry Viserra off to Theomore specifically was greatly due to it being what Jaehaerys most wanted.
While she never lost courage to bring up things or confront Jaehaerys completely, she did this less and less over the years. She was always much more limited than Rhaenys, Alyssa Velaryon, & Visenya concerning politics. Perhaps she felt this and-- By how she reacts to the Braxton Beesbury duel and how she progressively gloms onto Gael--she simultaneously opted to distance herself from Jaehaerys more and more without really making big confrontations until it came to the head of Saera running away, Daella dying, Viserra dying...when things are too late.
It's a pattern for sure, but a pattern I think Alysanne didn't feel she could get out of. Ironically, it matches Rhaena's own pattern of being "too late" in regards to Alyssa Velaryon and Aerea Targaryen's deaths. Both of these women seem to burrow into their psychological "safe spaces" or coping mechanisms and eventually harm or isolate themselves from those closest to them because they are compelled to try to preserve the smallest sense of agency their privileges as dragonriding Queens in a dynasty quickly assimilated into Andal patriarchy allows.
So, kinda sure. Yes she was complicit. She made her choices, but those choices were made under social compelled personal compromises. So, not too too much on Alysanne so as to make her equal to Jaehaerys. She wasn't perfect by far and again, was responsible for her kids' deaths (Viserra and Gael and Daella) but she can't be called the same or motivated similarly as Jaehaerys was nor that her actions would have been what they were if she hadn't lived in the misogynist setting with a sexist husband she married at 13 as she did. Another perfectly flawed, misguided female character, one who really wanted to "change the world" but was confined by her gender-exclusive role. She did deserve that "Good Queen" title.
Ironically, one of the only reprieves Viserra would have had if she had married Theomore was the very widow's Law that Alysanne made sure became a thing. A small and perhaps unsatisfactory "compensation", considering. Or a lifeline? Shows us all the more the precarious state of married life for women and girls.
tbh there was no reason to say that alicent and haelena were beloved by the smallfolk. they're part in starting the war that put the smallfolk to their knees, it's more reasonable for them to be hated than loved
Helaena's inactivity works well for her reputation (in-world and out) under the post-Fall of KL situation bc she's surrounded by more actively ruling women and actively ruling women are more under fire than those who ruler for a man, work behind the scenes, or directly rule. Since female rulership is not favored and even suspicious under Andal-Faith patriarchy.
Her own inactivity and the Faith-Andal social expectation of an ideal queen consort to be just a womb-for-heirs can do nothing to spoil the smallfolk's already favorable image/idea of her...bc she doesn't do anything that could affect said image.
Rhaenyra is the "bad guy" for the taxes and trying to rule; Helaena is the "good guy", for not ruling at all (and sitting there ready for symbolic use).
The whole point of GRRM writing about who was "loved" as a Queen and who wasn't was to point out how people in KL characterized a "good" Queen by her innocence, "sweetness" that is really their non-rulership and inactivity. Rhaenyra ruled obviously and directly, while Alicent ruled through others and for her sons in their absence while never having to really put down riots aside from the one she triggered by displaying a dragon's head through the streets. Alicent, unlike Rhaenyra, did not have to contend with rumors being spread about her specifically to destabilize her hand. Helaena didn't rule at all she was always just a consort who affected Aegon only once and that was accompanied by Alicent and other councilmen calming Aegon down when he wanted to imprison and kill Rhaenyra...nothing to do w/the smallfolk.
Yes, Helaena was a kinder, "gentler" person than those around her and even before the war she could have been loved for that....but she was also the most passive & accessory person than those around her and never effected any policies or laws, unlike Alysanne. Helaena never had be into a position as to decided what strategy or tactic to win smallfolk over or to support a city or defend against attackers to said city or to protect her family's image, prestige, etc. other than birthing and nurturing heirs. She never had to implement any unsavory taxes like Jaehaerys-Rego Draz or Rhaenyra-Bartimos or Rogar/Alyssa-Edwell or even just Alicent with her choice to drag around a dragon head. Or Dany with her opening the fighting pits to save her people, deciding not to kill her hostages, releasing a prisoner some of her council advised her not to, trying to get Drogo to stop the rape of Lhazarene women, etc. So of course she doesn't get any hate from anyone, much less the smallfolk who'd be most affected.
Remember that before the war, Rhaenyra's "Realm's Delight" moniker was also her image-advantaged(?) from the singers giving said name (bc child-Rhaenyra was seen as "delightful" at court where those singers are as they also were trying to gain favor from Viserys).
Likely, Viserys and his council used said moniker to their advantage and let their audience develop a stronger impression of Rhaenyra's overall loveliness. And not bc her child self--the precociousness, the beauty, etc.--wasn't real nor not bc she didn't grow up to be actually very beautiful, but bc it helped to bolster her image, this girl who would need a lot to supplement her newfound heirship since she was female.
Remember, too, how Daenaera Velaryon's childhood beauty was lauded and intertwined with her arrival to KL and the Maiden's Ball? Yeah.
It was worked with for Rhaenyra's later Riverland tour and worked to get the riverlords more on her side. this is the nature of the "two-faced coin" that F&B EXPLICITLY stated were of love and hate ("Rhaenyra Triumphant"):
The smallfolk did not know Helaena as subjects--esp peasants--can't personally know their leaders and their families. They love an idea of her; they hate an idea of Rhaenyra. And both images go through exchanges from the circumstances, not ONLY through the person's actions. And tbh and as the book tries to tell us, that is the best position a queen (consort) could have when she is surrounded by women (dowager, consort, regnant whatever) who take on a more active, male-conceived role in leadership.
This is bigger than "who was the bitch-queen" or the "perfect queen"?...precisely bc there is no such thing as a "perfect" queen aside form the queen who does nothing at all but be a womb for heirs. And if she does do charities, it's not even guaranteed to be exclusively be for the smallfolk. Alysanne was genuinely loved as a queen bc everyone could see how she affected Jaehaerys, she used said influence to make better laws for smallfolk and it was very obvious and public CONSTANTLY, went--by herself--to create women's courts, AND was she visually pretty. Helaena does not have such influence nor initiative; so the love for her cannot be from anything she did but what she stands for in the memory of the smallfolk, who at the were starving and in constant survival mode, desperate for economic and other types of "relief" (that yes, they should have gotten but didn't from noble warfare upending their already probs not-so-great abilities to sustain themselves pre-war), looking for something and anything like safety if not outright real physical safety.
This has interesting commentary and scenarios of what queenship means and how quickly the "coin" of favor of the public--noble or smallfolk, but esp the smallfolk--can turn! And it turns for the smallfolk depending on the immediate results of a leader's actions or to contrast an imagined/real "better" past against the reality under the current leader (Aerys II vs post-Robert's death).
Even way before this, we constantly hear from Jaehaerys I's early reign about "words are wind" and words vs action...let's piece things together, people!
The whole Alysanne/Viserra conflict is so bizarre I’m not sure why GRRM wrote it like that. Alysanne fears Viserra wants a crown…even though Aemon is still alive and Baelon hasn’t been named heir yet. Alysanne weeps for Daella dead at 18, blaming Jaehaerys for having her wed at too early of an age…but then pushes Viserra into a betrothal that causes her death at 15, again with a man older than Jaehaerys in the dreary and boring North, widowed 4 times and already with 5 children. Marrying an older brother for politics isn’t acceptable…even though Aegon the Uncrowed/Rhaena & Aegon/Visenya did it, plus she and Jaehaerys did it in defiance of their guardians, but I guess it’s so much better because of true love. Viserra is said to be a manipulator and committed alcoholic by 14, not even liking boys, but using her looks to get them to fight for her…yet her ambition is to go after Baelon, the man with two healthy trueborn sons already, 14 years older than her, not yet the heir with Aemon alive. How much influence could Viserra possibly have even if she did marry him at the time ? Obviously she had some attraction to him, if she wanted to seduce him (let me just roll my eyes at the mother trying to protect her nearly 30 year old son with 2 children from a “seductive” 15 year old girl…it’s pathetic) with all of the drawbacks. Alysanne’s view of her just makes no sense for her character or the timeline of events. But Viserra is so one dimensionally vain and openly ambitious (even when it contradicts itself, like surrounding herself with boys while having her eyes on Baelon) that she doesn’t come across as a person. It’s like the worst anti’s view of Cersei.
*EDITED POST* (4/17/24)
I recently wrote a Tweet about Alysanne vs Rhaena HERE, & the legacy of women/family destroying the other. And I have a Tumblr post abt Alysanne and her daughters HERE.
I don't know about your points about Alysanne's inconsistency, since I can see it happening in real life from the women I know or interacted with, their hypocrisies & self-defeating compromises. I do, however, see something in your critique of Viserra's writing. I'm offering a set of headcanons based on the knowledge that women are still subject to promoting patriarchy while also trying their best to look out for women's survival and/or rights, especially when their ability to even do that depends on their connection/support/allowance on certain sorts of male authority:
A) Alysanne's Attitude towards her Daughters
This is the passage anon refers to for Alysanne's grief over Daella being too young & her blaming Jaehaerys ("Policy, Progeny, and Pain"):
Watsonianly, I believe GRRM reasoned that Alysanne was less willing to not ship off Viserra because she compared her "slyness" and seeming confidence to Daella's timidity and seeming helplessness and concluded that Viserra was more needing of containment, less needing of her protection and partly because she had more of a will of her own towards her marriage. Viserra, more than Daella, was maybe perceived more as a trip of Alysanne's authority as both mother and a Queen in the face of Jaehaerys'....less charitable and constrictive privileges over Alysanne's earnest desire for women to advance more in the realm and especially in the monarchy itself (heir buisness). She was way more "eager" to have her away than she was for Daella.
I also say in my Twitter post these:
Alysanne looked at Viserra wanting to be Queen as insulting to the feeling that ALL the family should mourn & respect Alyssa's passing, not just her seemingly "protecting" her son from Viserra's shamed "preening" & demonizing her daughter for the sake of a male child she favored. Perhaps Aysanne felt Viserra showed she did not care about Alyssa as much as she should have.
perhaps she resented Viserra for showing how shallow the bonds b/t the siblings actually were due to the age differences & how little we actually hear of the 1st set of kids interacting w/the 2nd. Perhaps Alysanne thought this reflected a failure on her part as a mother.
maybe she partly resented Viserra for not "respecting" the boundaries of a man's posthumous grieving for seemingly one of her favorite kids...certainly she preferred/made more time for Baelon & Alyssa over Viserra, Vaegon, Saera, even though she definitely loved all her kids.
Alysanne perhaps saw in Baelyssa her own marriage with Jaehaerys AND it's "success" proved their joined right to rule/soulmatism (their union created another perfect, happy union & thus and wanting to believe their marriage was perfect, couldn't tolerate any corruption to that...unconsciously). By desiring Baelon for queenship, Viserra--to Alysanne--again does a "taboo" against Alysanne's private-public relation order. She may have taken it very personally (2nd line after "PLUS" in paragragph below).
But most importantly after Saera's "scandal" & Daella's will against a more routine marriage arrangement/determination to find a husband on her own terms, I think the fear of Viserra "ruining herself, being separated forever from the family like Saera (the North is better than Essos), and ruining the family's/Jaehaerys' prospects PLUS her own experience of helplessness transformed into her needing to direct and arrange the circumstances that she did for Viserra. As well as look at her like she was an issue to be reconsolidated more than a child even though she also did seem to love her. It's possible she justified to herself that Viserra would always be as close as she can be.
Marriage is not just about the couple's happiness--the first priority is actually usually for the respective families' politics and it is a business move. There were political incentives for her to marry Theomore Manderly--the old lord of White Harbor in the North that weren't there for Daella marrying Rodrik Arryn. Theomore was a Seven-faithful vassal to the lords Stark. Jaehaerys had severely angered the Lord of Winterfell, and even though Alysanne made him more amicable, the lord liked her better than Jaehaerys and Jaehaerys seemed too anxious to always make sure the North remained less willing to see the Targs as enemies, which a marriage would do. In one of the last 4 pics below, we see Alysanne try to convince Alaric to have one of his family marry some woman of her choosing.: (A Surfeit of Rulers"; "Triumphs and Tragedies").
vs
Some might argue why he didn't allow Daella to marry a Stark: one, she already had the chance to marry an old gods worshiper, Royce Blackwood, but once she found out about the house still worshipping the old gods, she refused the marriage saying she didn't want to go to hell; two, I do not think the Starks even had eligible sons at the time when they were deciding who she'd marry. Neither Rodrik Arryn's loyalty nor his positive feelings towards the crown were doubted.
Plus, Jaehaerys was growing much more impatient and fed up with Daella than he did with Viserra because of Daella's constant refusing to marry any lord that was chosen for her which I don't fault her too much for, some were questionable ("Policy, Progeny, and Pain"):
So again, I think that Alysanne grew more wary & frustrated with his dismissiveness to the point where she became much more protective and also caring or attentive towards Daella in a way she wasn't for Saera or Viserra because the latter both acted more independently or self-soothed. Alysanne also might have seemed to/might have that Viserra--in her "sly" willfulness ("oh, you think you're grown?") didn't deserve or need her protection as much as Daella did, even though Viserra was younger when she arranged the marriage. The eagerness for Daella's departure came more from Jaehaerys than Alysanne, while for Viserra, it was more Alysanne's own negative feelings driving her arrangements. So on Alysanne's end, it's easier or more obvious to blame Jaehaerys for Daella than it is herself for either Viserra or Saera. Though for Saera, though I blame both, I still blame Jaehaerys more and while it was certainly Alysanne's doing to arrange Viserra for the old-guy-with-four-kids Theomore, it came after the heels of the "trouble" with Daella's marriage.
PLUS they came after the group of kids Jae & Aly had & already gave their most emotionally energetic years to (I mentioned in another post that you are less able to practically give your love to more than 4-5 kids, esp if you are devoted to your job, profession, or duties as these two parents were). Daella died in 82 A.C. while Viserra died in 87 A.C. And though they are part both of the second set of kids Aly & Jae had together (the first set Daenerys, Aemon, Baelon, & Alyssa), even within this set the age difference b/t Daella and Viserra was 7 years.
While Alysanne observed their kids more than Jaehaerys and knew what they did and stuff, she also was herself "tired" or less willing to accommodate more deemed "disruptive" personalities even though she loved all her kids. Why? Again, too many kids, her using marriage (as Visenya & Rhaenys did) as a more political tool than one to totally satisfy her daughters' personal preferences, and a less interested-domestically-participating husband while trying to participate in politics herself but also expected to be the head of child nurturing simultaneously. The ones that can be more "managed", the more able/willing Alysanne will be sympathetic towards them or fight with Jaehaerys over their futures.
Therefore, it seemed Alysanne was a lot more eager & self-convinced to "get rid of" Viserra than she ever was for Daella because of the different pressures from her husband, her conclusions about their daughters' characters, and her own stake in the policy-making she wanted to participate in even though she expressed. Women can be like this, semi-subtly & subtly perpetuating patriarchal limitations thinking that it is "for the best" while really using the subject's seeming or real noncompliance with socialized gender ideology and behaviors.
Also, though Aegon V and Betha Blackwood married for love, they insisted that their kids marry for politics and by their direction anyway. Parents/leaders often compromise their own previous actions or intentions for the present necessities or perceived "greater" needs. Jaehaerys himself cites how he doesn't like how Alyssa Velaryon & Rogar Baratheon both seek to control him...and then he goes on to do this to his own kids. 🤷🏼♂️
B) Viserra's Desire isn't all that Vain
1.
You:
But Viserra is so one dimensionally vain and openly ambitious (even when it contradicts itself, like surrounding herself with boys while having her eyes on Baelon) that she doesn’t come across as a person. It’s like the worst anti’s view of Cersei.
a)
Yes, it is like the worst anti's view. Because an anti is writing about her. It is their perspective & Fire and Blood is written in hindsight, written around Robert Baratheon's time.
When we talk about her being "one-dimensionally vain", it comes down to the Unreliable narrator and the lack of grace they afford to her. Not saying she wasn't vain...but she had a lot of good motivation to rely on looks.
Viserra was 15 when she died. Fifteen-year-olds hardly know themselves, compared to those above 18, at least. And they tend to be a lot more self-concerned or confrontational, rebellious, testing the social limits of whatever, etc. But they also can still use reasoning and draw conclusions about their society's implications for them based on their roles to get what they want or to oppose legitimately unfair restrictions against them.
Viserra was a female royal of parents who some might describe as "workaholics", determined to politick their way into maintaining the dynasty, and as I mentioned above, Viserra was part of the latter, less-emotionally-attended-to brood. Her role, as we see how Jaehaerys treated Saera, was to marry & reproduce and not do as her brothers Aemon & Baelon did which was to work with Jaehaerys & work together in anticipation of becoming the next leaders of said dynasty and Westeros.
As a princess who'd not politically trained similarly as her brothers and after being taught/directed by Septas, learning how to become a lady of a court for when she marries she's got little comparatively to do other than, hang out with other girls of the court & any willing siblings, read, play games, dance, maybe ride horses and hunt, etc. she's got comparatively bigger slots of time to herself and perhaps be a bit lonely. Especially when she has parents who worked often. We don't see nor hear of her actually having close relationships with any of her siblings: Maegelle, Alyssa, Baelon, and Aemon are adults with families of their own or out of the keep in other ligelong devotions; Vaegon is, I believe a maester by the time she was about to married off, and still, he wasn't interested in any of his siblings; Daella seemed...more attached to Alysanne and not that engaging; Saera, it's said, that NONE of her sister liked, which includes Viserra; Gael hadn't been born until 80 A.C., and was 7 when Viserra was 15.
Viserra was not hopelessly stupid--it's implied that she, like Saera, wanted more autonomy and/or political power. And like every other royal or noble girl, she did not really interact with people outside KL or the Red Keep that she could or was allowed to. Perhaps. As I mentioned, she's not out of KL at all, spending her relatively contained life in the castle or in illicit adventures with her followers. Baelon is not only familiar and a more predictable option to Viserra, but he'd be more willing than any other candidate to treat her respectfully for the sibling tie/his disposition. No, she doesn't love him, but she doesn't seem as romantic or idealistic as 13-year-old Alysanne was like. Yeah, attracted to Baelon, but not in love or nor yearning for him as Alyssa did, as Alysanne was. Which yes, would read as her being less "worthy" of Baelon to Alysanne--even though I think Alysanne still saw/sees Jaehaerys' reign as righteous and herself destined to not just be his Queen but to be Queen, for her own ambitions to shape Westeros through him.
Viserra may have seen through her Aysanne's influence, self-confidence, and comfort with wielding what little influence she had over Jaehaerys power that a Queen Consort can do a lot, and that a woman can have "more". Baelon is trained under their father, Jaehaerys...perhaps Baelon will also let her have as much or close influence?
And she knows that in her society, a girl's looks are one of her greatest currencies towards access to a man's power because a girl's looks are what draws a man...besides their rank or family's money/political prospects. But a man will really care about a wife in this society if she's exceptionally or conventionally attractive, as long as she is publicly recognized as attractive. This plus what I mentioned about her not having any granted access to real political activity is thus part of why her vanity is one of the most potent we read in Fire and Blood. If her beauty, rank, and Targness are what she has that gets her what she wants and what she is barred from without, she's going to emphasize and rely on them.
And/or she just loves being beautiful. It's a weird state of being for girls, when they have beauty. Beauty for women & girls tends to fall subject to objectification/currency and a way to trap them in a catch-22 of being perceived as "arrogant" (if they actually acknowledge and celebrate their beauty) vs "having no self-respect/untrustworthy"(if they do not cultivate their beauty or insist--whether genuinely or not--that they do not see themselves as attractive or that attractiveness doesn't really matter). Their beauty can be used for social currency & access to wealthier men's privileges and rights than both women deemed less attractive AND men. Men especially tend to believe that women actually do not go through much hardship bc it's "easy" to have others "take care of" you--as a woman, and esp a pretty woman, you are "in demand" & "don't have to work". Not realizing maintaining beauty does take focus, attention, time AND it can still get objectifying uniquely for women. That beautification is a process & women more than men are expected to do it or have no value at all, while men do not have to be pretty to be respected, though it certainly adds points even to other men.
All of these things, the first level of the narrator--the maesters writing this record--do not consider, because she is a girl with little policy-making or incumbent power, nor does she ever become like Alysanne, supporting and advising a powerful man. No, she is not really treated as a person. They, unlike Septon Barth explaining Saera's motives at the time, not hundreds of years later, do not break down Viserra's.
b)
But Viserra is so one dimensionally vain and openly ambitious (even when it contradicts itself, like surrounding herself with boys while having her eyes on Baelon) that she doesn’t come across as a person.
Let's take this as it is for a second. The girl is fifteen and a princess. Again, fifteen-year-olds are already not that...idk, shrewd? Esp with such a high status or privileges and getting a lot of admiration when their parents may not give them much attention [Saera again], Viserra would have maybe used the male attention for her confidence level, and rationalized it as her due, as she already says she knows she's beautiful when some lord or something says that. Again, reliance on beauty PLUS teenhood with nothing else for her to do with herself. It's a fascinating intersection.
The male admirers thing & seemingly contradiction of attention thing. She, like Saera, led a group of followers/admirers similar, perhaps wishing to emulate a Queen's household or at least to borrow a kind of retinue to mimic that/set up through these male admirers. As I explained about isolation, a girls' beauty, and her possible loneliness, yes sometimes people do not-so-smart things to feel a little less lonely or validated. I know a person who, at high school, actually tried to "seduce" their history teacher. wild stuff, but it came from a place of severe insecurity, which was fostered by misogyny and neglect at home. 🤷🏻♀️ Again, she could have rationalized it as her "practicing" "holding court" for the future or affirming her ability to get such admirers. That itself is an attempt at power-denied or trivialized.
c)
Now, let's consider how Viserra rationalized Baelon seeing her with her male admirers. If Alysanne and Jaehaerys weren't too concerned and Baelon was busy or inattentive, then Baelon wouldn't be that suspicious of her virginity...nor care all that much. She's still his sister and Baelon is presumably the least prideful/machismo of all his brothers except maybe Aemon and we don't even know that much of Aemon.
If anything, she might have thought that if Baelon did see these male courtiers around her, that raises her "value", bc these guys think she's pretty enough. Baelon, as a man, must too--if he only really looked at me. If the court gossip about it is true, this would have motivated her into "forcing" her to look at her by catching him with her clothes off. Why getting drunk? Because she is 15, a virgin, never has tried something like this before, and thus sought out liquid courage. She was also very anxious about being married off to Theomore and felt pressure to get Baelon to marry her instead, so the alcohol was also to reduce her fears so she could seem more in control....until she got carried away. Again, IF the gossip has truth.
And yes, some men of power do look at how other men see a women's beauty to evaluate how much social status she'd be to him if he partnered up with her. "Trophy wives" came from somewhere. Plus, men often validate themselves through other men's evaluation of them and whatever they can claim control over or claim, which is nearly often women and "lineage", real or not real.
2.
You:
yet her ambition is to go after Baelon, the man with two healthy trueborn sons already, 14 years older than her, not yet the heir with Aemon alive. How much influence could Viserra possibly have even if she did marry him at the time ? [...] (let me just roll my eyes at the mother trying to protect her nearly 30 year old son with 2 children from a “seductive” 15 year old girl…it’s pathetic) with all of the drawbacks.
Now I don't know if Viserra knew much about the actual ins-and-outs of Visenya and Aegon I's relationship (we don't we just know she was active in politics and loyal and confident and bold) or if she actually put as much thought into this as I have below, but I do think she felt she just had more of a chance to not be subject to others' authority the closest she could be to the highest authority available to women and that if she thought Baelon would be king, it's because Aemon had no male heirs.
From how Saera at least knew that Maegor had 6 wives and presumably their names and what their recorded actions/legacies were, Viserra also would likely have known about Visenya and Rhaena as was recorded by the maesters. More or less what we the readers know, if not a bit more. there would be several accounts written of Rhaena and Visenya, but we don't have that, we have just AWoIaF, Fire and Blood (which was written around Robert's time), and whatever random stuff from the main series.
Baelon already having two sons would seem to contradict Viserra pursuing him just for power. However, maybe:
[Aemon & Jocelyn marry in 70 A.C. Rhaenys was born in 74 A.C. Aemon dies in 92 A.C., so Rhaenys was 18 when he died and she was 13 in 87, when Viserra dies.] In the 13 years Rhaenys was alive, Jocelyn never birthed another kid. And after Rhaenys, the couple enjoyed many years together before Aemon's death, so they all probably thought her infertile. Jocelyn and Aemon had no sons. So, yes, people could have thought Baelon would eventually become the heir apparent to Aemon. And Jaehaerys never went out and declared it until Aemon's death, but he also never declared or approved Aemon's daughter Rhaenys being heir to the heir to the throne...ever. Despite some people praising Rhaenys as the next ruler after her birth. This is where Viserra/a reader could come from is perhaps coming from, if just to rationalize. This sort of almost panicky rationalization so pretty perfect for a girl who desperately did not want to marry a really old man.
part of Baelon's draw would be because, as I mentioned, familiarity, security, and assurance of his taking care of her/non-abusiveness or non-suppressiveness. That comes with or without sons/kids. Even with Aemon being alive.
she'd be escaping a much, too old guy that lives too far from King's Landing, the only home she's ever known and her parents gave her no other options
Women both in real and Westerosi history still relatively benefit from being married over being unmarried in some ways in feudal/monarchial/highly-patriarchal systems. Sometimes even when their marriage has had no children.
Viserra can birth children later after marriage (again, she was 15 and had a lot of childbearing years in her--as gross as that sounds--in the context of the society where she lives). No matter how back in the line of succession those kids with Baelon would be, having shared legitimate kids with the monarch/heir secures her staying married to him and thus secures her own position as one of the highest-ranking woman in Westeros, which is the aim of her marrying Baelon. Because less of her life is determined by others and she is one of the women who has the highest authorities.
Even though Baelon already had sons, she'd still be his Queen Consort, no matter what. After he dies, she'd still become a "Queen Dowager", as Rhaena, Visenya, etc. were. Visenya had Aegon's younger son...still Queen Dowager and a force to be reckoned with in court. Rhaena was once feared (unjustly) by Alyssa Velaryon, Rogar Baratheon, and her own parents--Alysanne & Jaehaerys. Rhaena and Maegor never had kids (thank god), but Rhaena was a Queen Dowager with her own ability to set up a household & direct men & women as if she were a roaming, quasi--Queen Regnant (which inspired the fear in her own family).
Alicent plays a similar game with marrying Viserys. She knows, like everyone else, that to marry a King, you become "first lady" of the realm. And becoming the mother to the next King, you definitely become the most powerful woman in the realm--before any princesses or Dowager Queens of the past Kings. But even if she didn't have Viserys' kids, she'd still have been a Queen Dowager. Alicent managed to bear 4 kids for Viserys, 3 of them male. Technically she should have enjoyed the certainty of being that "most powerful woman" by having a son as King. But unfortunately for her, Viserys had a daughter whom he named his heir and maintained her above Alicent's sons in the succession line. Having no kids or sons is not the absolute end of the world for a woman seeking power in Westeros through marrying the royal family, but Alicent wanted the surety of her sons being King. As we see Visenya has more power than Rhaena.
Viserra would have been the stepmother of Daemon & Viserys, but she'd still be a parental figure, raising them (or doing the bare minimum) PLUS their aunt by blood. She still has access to power through them after Baelon dies if she plays her cards right, esp if she has just daughters or never had legitimate kids. And if she has kids, those kids are sibling-cousins to Viserys/Daemon/the future probable King. As long as it doesn't devolve into a green-black situation (which it likely wouldn't, not with her being a Targ already and not so devoted to the Faith as Alicent), she can enjoy and feel secure her stepkids/nephews will treat her own children/her well.
Either way, she has a better deal being the Queen consort, then a Queen dowager, than being a lady-wife to some lord--in her perception and what she's observed has learned so far without knowing of the various lords' holdings or how much power she'd had outside her own family. Again, she doesn't travel and is likely not to have heard any comprehensive details of any lords outside the Keep. Broad strokes, little detail.
Someone said in a TikTok once--I think GoThistorian--that Cersei might have fared better if she married Oberyn Martell and not a royal like Robert or Rhaegar because in Dorne noblewomen have so much more value, authority, & autonomy even as not a lady regnant nor a Princess, which was what Cersei needed above all else. Her mother, Joanna, actually seemed to have started or was planning for her to marry a Dornish person when we hear she was friends with the Princess of Dorne and the trouble with Aerys'...attentions towards her. Viserra--for the moment we see her--is somewhat like Cersei here in that she wants more access to power than she does. Cersei dreamed of being Rhaegar's wife and wanted to be Robert's because she wanted that access above any romances. Viserra, same.
Some real noble women have become the mistresses of kings--whether the parties involved were already married themselves and/or had kids already or not--even though their kids would inevitably be illegitimate. Whether more by their own choice or by the insistence and arrangement of their families.
Alysanne is treated awfully by her husband, who is never once confronted by the narrative for his horrible behaviour. Who would rather risk her dying in childbirth than take any steps to prevent pregnancy as she requests, forces her beloved and mentally disabled daughter to be married off despite the obvious risk to her life and refuses to take responsibility when Daella inevitable suffers an awful death, and who values people of Alysanne’s gender so little that he completely goes against Westerosi custom by passing over his own granddaughter.
If Alysanne, powerless apart from what Jaehaerys deigned to grant her, helpless to stop her daughters being out at risk or to decide for herself to see Saera again, is GRRM’s example of a good queen, it’s pretty sad.
I understand the frustration, since again we never get more queens exactly like Rhaenys or Visenya and even here we may comment on how un-feminist or anti woman it is to not have them as "ideal" queens when Rhaenys died in the violence of war (the eradication of women in fiction) while Visenya enables a tyrant to rule...but really F&B and the Targaryens' history was not really supposed to be a feminist tale BECAUSE the history--though not-- was meant to show the decline of royal female power & agency that happened due to the assimilation into Andal patriarchy for power and/or to get a foothold and unified state to fight against the Others if you think of the theory of Aegon having a dragon dream about this. Especially in connection to Dany's rise.
AND I will say I do agree to critique on how GRRM's writing sometimes inspires anti-woman-ess through a paltry (thought we can't say nonexistent, there is a punishment against rape or sense of social taboo on rape in Westeros, but...) pushback or punishment for rape and violence against women [joannalannister]. I'm saying that GRRM's work is not meant to be taken as actual feminist literature but a series that really sets out to dramatize already obvious and present/past truths and conditions...sometimes to the detriment of its female characters and the impression made on readers. GRRM is still a liberal-ist white man.
AT THE SAME TIME, SINCE THIS ISN'T A FEMINIST SERIES BUT A "LOOK WHAT CAN HAPPEN" SORT OF THING:
I think that the whole point is that, yes, this is sad and it stems from how limiting such a set up/social conditions are AND Alysanne was a politically "good" queen. How she treats her own kids and is complicit in how they died or ran away should be a part of how "good" one is as a general sort of leader, yeah, but unlike Jaehaerys and the "good" he did, Alysanne's "good" acts for the realm had much more of a necessary impact in the sociopolitical landscape of their subjects. And I mean towards more marginalized groups, esp women. It's like she made sure to "round up" those left behind in other aristocrat's projects.
la-pheacienne says this:
Whether that someone has been chosen by the people, or by the gods, or by destiny, or by circumstances, and regardless of the political system that allowed them to yield that power, the point is that someone has power ad hoc at any given time, and power equals responsibility. What do you do with it? How do you govern? How do you choose between two equally grievous alternatives? Who do you listen to? Who do you trust? How can you learn? What if everything you've been told was a lie? How do you move on from there? What if the promises you made contradict each other? What if you fail? How do you live with the guilt, how do you go on? How do you instigate a structural change? What if you try to do that and people die? What if you try to do that and it kills you? Was it worth it?
On top of that, Alysanne was still a Consort, not a Regnant. (POST & POST) She had less power than Rhaenya or Visenya, who though were not exactly Regnants they also weren't just Aegon's wives but consummate and active politicians themselves, making deals in the open, riding dragons into wars, enacting laws, and creating institutions.
Alysanne had to rely on her husband's power to have and hope to have her thoughts on legislation come to reality. It is just a fact that queen consorts, unlike Queen Regnants, had to depend on their royal husband's favor, regard, or perception of need of them to have any semblance of power. Because they were women and consorts. It's part of the deal, the sociopolitical conditions. In reality and real history, it was such for MOST queen consorts.
Yeah they had more power at court and influenced their husbands, but you are seeing in Alysanne something that looks like what that sort of power could have been like. Even Alysanne had more influence over Jaehaerys than some real queen Consorts and those that came after her! Think of Rhaella, Naerys, Myriah Martell, etc.
Were there female consorts in real history who practiced more influence, power, etc. than their officially ruling husband or were their active equals in terms of policy making while showing some power over their kids lives than just, of course! But this is not the rule of the land, but exceptions. Nor the most common experience of medieval/early-mod-period women/female consorts precisely bc it was thought women didn't make good rulers. There is Empress Sisi, who couldn't even keep her own children close to her because royal children are not considered the Queen's but those "of the state", so the emperor and/or his mother could force them apart for any reason.
Juxtapose this to the Viserra situation. Alysanne actually was the one to arrange for the marriages she knew her husband wanted (esp after the whole deal with Daella refusing nearly every man/boy), and insisted to Viserra she had to marry Theomore Manderly. She had more power over her kids than you may think...it's not perfect because she is of course anticipating & complying with Jaehaerys' desires for the girls to be married off quick enough to build certain alliances or to just get rid of them, but she does not allow herself to really think the match bad and refuses to listen to her daughter. There was will here, from Alysanne not present in Sisi, and again, she had more power than later Consorts...yet based in Jaehaerys' will because she is a Consort and a dragonrider (helps the impression and image to gain "respect").
So we're presented with another question this series inspires: when & how should someone lay blame or responsibility on marginalized groups, identities, etc. like women of aristocratic classes, men of lower classes, either of different "races" (fiction and reality), and with what evidence?
First, Alysanne married Jaehaerys as his companion since she was 13. Before that, they were very close and were more or less each other's most important and intimate companions for years. She saw him as the default king, the leader, and herself as a necessary ingredient to Westeros' prosperity. That they would work more together than other couples...She was both right and wrong, and I think/headcanon she was sorely and quietly disappointed well before she observed Jaehaerys pass a girl over the 2nd time. So she acted the way she did at "home" towards her kids to feel more in control bc that is where Jaehaerys left her to act with some agency or authority more.
Second, Daenerys is the example of a "perfect", ideal, but also realistic "good queen"; someone that realistically and optimistically chooses to do good with the power she has and has managed to find value and meaning to use said power for others other than herself despite all that she went through. How those things would likely have turned some other women out, who were compelled to be more self-oriented, like Rhaenyra or Daena. She is purposefully different from her ancestors this way, but also similar to a lot of them, in that particular inner strength that she has to reinforce her altruism. That doesn't mean that people who don't do that special balance of strong altruism to her level are completely incapable, evil, or "bad queens".
Cersei? Hell yes, but even with Cersei we must acknowledge how while she is how she is bc she herself is pretty narcissistic and has been since young, most of her circumstances also has her try to make things better for herself due to certain circumstances and most criticism against her in the fandom--or the loudest--are sexist or just unfair. Alysanne? She at least did something where most did nothing and went against the clear wishes of her husband, and within the timeline she still is a source of inspiration for people like Dany. That has to mean something or there really is less of a source to compare oneself and learn from or to be able to analyze the good, bad, and how things developed the way they have.
This is a world where you are not encouraged to think outside of your own class, much less the principles and ideology about your gender. There are little to no thinkpieces or essays about how sexist some men and women are, what gives them the feeling that the way they think is correct, etc. There was and is no vocabulary for that; there is just experience and having to respond to your environment. You have to do the legwork yourself, and your group and support system, your own connections, and play the game. Sometime, you will fall off and especially when you have been bested or someone has used their socially given advantage over you...was Jaehaerys has done to Alysanne a few times or what courtiers and other lords can do.
So, with this in mind, I think it's important to acknowledge that yes while GRRM did not supply more examples of ideally acting "good queens", he does provide a clear outlook on how women could, would, and did act in real life history and TODAY. Because those questions about how to be a good ruler or a good person or how to differentiate. But it's not GRRM's personal example, necessarily or what he thinks a woman is capable of in his idea of a what a good medieval queen cold be. Alysanne is a "good" queen in that she does try to think of her subjects' needs before aristocrats' even with her behavior towards her daughters. To undermine that in our understanding that she did what did to her daughters is probably on GRRM, but more on others.
Jaehaerys was that sincerely altruistic: right of first night abolishment, the KL drinking water, her attempts to convince maesters of girls and women becoming maesters, etc. Again, It is Queen Consorts, unlike Queen regnants, had to depend on her royal husband's favor, regard, or perception of need of her to have any semblance of power because she is a woman and a Consort. I
I suppose I'm trying to say that in the process of understanding rather than being told what is right or logical, it's important to "good queens" from the context of which they come and take serious their conditions to understand the nuances of how truly "good" they were...even if we can say being a "good" queen needs to be an absolute in the first place.
Does Alysanne need to be a perfect feminist to be a good Queen? What if she is also responding to the setbacks against her AS she is trying to rule better, these setbacks that are designed for a man, her husband, to have more power than her and even to stop inhibit her ability to address certain problems without fear of losing said power given to her in the first place bc of her connection to him and official subordination to his paternal rule?
Outside of how he writes sexual violence and general violence against women, the line b/t power of self vs power from men, present in women's authority (especially in pre-feminist movement history), must be studied with some more nuance than with men's power. On our part as readers.
I'd say that GRRM uses violence against women as too much of a "gotcha" or flagrantly uses it as a device of emphasis than it needs to be, which simultaneously converts it to something psychologically insubstantial, something we shouldn't pay as much mind to, yes. The specific events of violence or normalization of violence done to women in ASoIaF that doesn't match real historical realities for women is definitely a huge concern because of this, but to mistake the power dynamics b/t a Consort and her ruling husband and most women to men does not help matters.
I can’t help but wonder how different things might have been if Aerea had actually become queen. If she had succeeded and ruled effectively, she might have set a lasting precedent for female rulership within House Targaryen.
Jaehaerys and Alysanne are rightly celebrated for their reign, yet it’s difficult not to think of Rhaena’s sacrifices. It's because of her that they got the throne. And while Alysanne fought for Daenerys’ rights as an heir, her silence regarding Aerea feels a bit hypocritical.
The recurring pattern of Targaryen women being denied their rightful place on the throne. Rhaena, Aerea, Rhaenys, Rhaenyra, and Daena—each of them had a claim, and each was overlooked, usurped, or dismissed.
Her and Alyssa Velaryon, more so Alyssa & her sacrifices tbh.
And yes it's hypocritical, esp when I am sure Alysanne was and never truly was without a little ambition or desire for legacy and prestige through her kids herself. She might have wanted her own daughters and/or sons to be above her sister's that the opportunity that Jaehaerys' kingship brought, of them becoming rulers like Daemon did. If Aerea had become Jaehaerys' heir apparent instead of just the presumptive heir, I don't think she'd go out of her way to stop that like Alicent and plot, but she wouldn't necessarily be pleased. It's like if a wealthy and kind woman saw her sister's kid would "inherit" a seat in their family's business or board or whatever that's been all or mostly male for ages but wanting her own kids (male or female, and even maybe preferrably female) to do so instead.
Alysanne is still of her time and of a class, thought she was by far the kindest person and more proactive and involved women around at the time.
Alysanne betrothing a 15 years-old Viserra to a man old enough to be her grandfather who already buried four wives is not only incredibly awful, but stupid. Why the hell would she betrothed her daughter to the vassal of a Lord Paramount who already has three sons & therefore diminishes her grandchildren having land of their own ? If Alysanne’s goal was to “[draw] the North closer to the Iron Throne”, why wasn’t there any thought to betrothing Viserra to Lord Edric Stark ? He might have been of an age with her (Viserra was born in 71 AC, and while it’s not clear when Edric was born, he had to have been born sometime between 58 AC, when Alysanne visited Lord Alaric, at which time both of his sons were unwed, and 72 AC, when Lord Alaric died), and surely that would have been an even more direct way of “drawing the North closer to the Iron Throne”.
Alysanne only wanted to punish and humiliate her daughter. She didn’t care about Viserra’s future or happiness. Alysanne sacrificed her teenage daughter in order to “protect” her adult son. Love is not a requirement in political marriages and it’s not Viserra’s fault that a bunch of simps fought over her.
Anon is responding to either this post or this one. I offered in one of them that Alysanne married Viserra off to this old guy bc it was within Jaehaerys' interests to make sure Alaric Stark wasn't too hostile towards him for what happened to his older brother.
It's stated twice, BOTH by he himself, that it's better to draw the North closer to the throne through this marriage ("Policy, Progeny, & Pain"):
In one of those posts, too, I mentioned that it's very possible that Alysanne wanted to "contain" Viserra's ambitions following both Jaehaerys' desires to use them all as political pawns plus her own wariness towards her daughters' own ambitions conflicting with the crown's/Jaehaerys'. There was definitely the element of "protecting her son" in it (as I say in this tweet).
Aegon I to Jaehaerys I and the Dance: Culture Contact, the Dissolution of Family, and Succession
Disclaimer: Long & EDITED
I can see where some people would have a lot of sympathy for Jaehaerys, who faced an uncle’s murderous intent and a future stepfather’s treacherous intent AND had to shore up defenses for his own political security and validation as a king.
Before Jaehaerys
The Targaryens have had a major problem that needed solving or settling since Aegon I conquered Westeros: how to rule when your means to power conflicts or troubles with the larger body of people’s customs.
Acculturation:
Acculturation is broadly defined as a process of cultural and psychological change that occurs when two cultural groups interact. Cultural changes include alterations in a group’s customs, and in their economic and political life. Psychological changes include alterations in individuals’ attitudes toward the acculturation process and their cultural identities. Acculturation has a strong conceptual and empirical appeal in psychological research because of its hypothesized, as well as demonstrated, relationships to a wide array of psychosocial factors among ethnic groups that are in culture contact settings. These include: mental health, sociocultural adaptation, acculturative stress, self-identity, and personality, to name a few. Berry, proposed a bi-dimensional acculturation model based on two issues important to those who are in intercultural contact. These issues refer to the extent to which individuals and groups (1) seek to maintain their heritage culture and identity; and (2) seek to have interactions with people of other cultures in the larger plural society. When these two dimensions are crossed, four acculturation strategies are defined: assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Assimilation exists when individuals do not wish to maintain their heritage culture, and seek to become fully involved with the larger society; Separation exists when ethnic people place a value on holding on to their original culture, and at the same time, wish to avoid interaction with the dominant culture. Integration exists when individuals wish to maintain their heritage culture and also aspire to be fully engaged in the life of the larger society. Marginalization, an exact opposite of integration, reflects minimal interest in either heritage cultural maintenance or connection with dominant culture.
The Girl-lessness of the Second Generation
It’s popular in the fandom to say or think that Aegon I was lucky to not have had a daughter or a girl who came before either Aenys or Maegor because he would have had to contend with the other lords’ pressures and possible threats towards the possible decision to name a girl as his heir and set up equal primogeniture. these lords whose fathers, uncles, etc all died during the conquest and who are all now coming into their own positions of power, some relying on the social preference for male leaders. Aegon I never had to deal with that circumstance, so he faced no problems.
Well, the problem with that is that eventually there statistically will be an eldest female child (Rhaena, Aerea, Daenerys, & Rhaenyra) at some point in the dynasty and the window of opportunity will get smaller and smaller for a female Targ Queen with each passing generation of male rulers.
And without a girl to raise alongside his sons (eldest or not) as their peer, Aegon I was not able to address the issues that his sons and those around would have with a possible female heir. In real-time. To have the chance of declaring and setting up female Targs to have their own right to authority and leadership even over their eldest male sibling. There was no girl asserting herself and confronting her brothers/Westerosi patriarchy, or her brother(s) publicly declaring and supporting his eldest sister. Forcing the existing Targs to structure and plant a pole in the sand concerning how their dynasty/house would arrange their members’ roles and potentially make it more equal even with the Westerosi lords' contempt and rebellion.
Without a sister to be trained/raised alongside Maegor and Aenys like Visenya and Rhaenys were with Aegon I, the ability to rule and became constrained to Aenys and Maegor. (hamliet has this great meta as to how and why Visenya allowed Maegor to act as he did and her relationships with her siblings HERE) precisely because Maegor was emotionally more reserved for her and she felt less lonely after his birth. Without a sister/potential partner to have built a relationship with, there were fewer experiences where they had to contemplate and shape themselves around and for that female peer. They didn’t have to emotionally or psychologically accommodate themselves around a female Targ peer nor were encouraged to. So it was easier to not see them as peers or equals and see other, non-Targ women as more baby-makers or subject-wife than ruling-partner. This obviously goes for Maegor, with how he treated his wives and killed them; but we see it too with Aenys and how he didn’t make Rhaena his heir, who was his and Alyssa Velaryon’s eldest surviving child.
Andal preference and patriarchy would have had much more of an influence on how these two thought about their own and their female partners’ roles for power consolidation...which is subsidiary to the point of baby-maker instead of a more shared role like Visenya/Rhaenys. Even with Visenya’s personality and living to advise Aenys and seat Maegor. Instead, things fell by the wayside towards the more seemingly expedient option for the male rulers -- because of that lack of confrontation and possible subsequent acculturation (when the minority maintains some of their cultural identity).
Valyrian Custom vs Westerosi
Aenys and his brother Maegor I were merely the second generation of ruling Targs and the first born into monarchy. And it goes without saying that the Targs were not ethnically nor fully “Westerosi” but Valyrian, along with having with conflicting customs such as polygamy and sibling/avunculate incest marriage (even with the first cousin and two Stark examples of avunculate marriages in non Targ Westerosi marriages).
Even though the Targs do not seem to have taken as much Valyrian objects and practices with them when they fled the Freehold and Valyrains were not as gender-egalitarian as the Rhoynar (as egalitarian as principalities can be), we also see many examples and suggestions of Valyrian customs and culture being much less restrictive and oppressive towards women than Westerosi/Andal/First Men culture through:
Aegon I having to marry his sister Visenya according to Targ House rules
Jaenaera Belarys riding her dragon completely alone and facing no sociopolitical consequences for it
Visenya and Rhaenys’ multiple interactions with Aegon (how the Kingsguard came to be) that Westerosi people would probably call “liberties”
their ability to autonomously make laws (not suggest, make)
both women being entrusted to conquer pieces of Westeros’ proto-realm kingdoms -- Rhaenys with Dorne and Visenya with the Vale
both of the wives’ children being considered heirs/claimants in their house. Not the throne, house!
In the face of the Westerosi subjects being ruled and its customs towards (preferred) male primogeniture, the rules of succession and the distribution of power amongst the royal members of this house inevitably fell into a questionable state after the cultural contact. What does it mean for a potential female ruler and lawmaker to exist to lead Westerosi men? For Visenya, it meant something to fear and revile, as she’s traditionally referred to as either a witch or the one totally responsible for Maegor’s cruelty; for Rhaenys, it means that such a woman is given too much power and license to use it and endangers her husband’s hold on power through her son’s doubted parentage (after suspicions of infidelity) all for being “allowed” and choosing to surround herself with male companions.
Aenys I:
coming to be doubted or just suspected as unfit and probably not given much reality checks for the love Aegon bore his dead mother (protectiveness)
looking at his mother’s history
seeing how placating the Westerosi sensibility for a male heir
seeking to please as many people as possible
hearing from his father, or just partially observing that it’s important to consider the subjects’ expectations of the ruler when making decisions for those subjects when the Targs -- isolated from their old home and being the only Valyrian dragonriders left in the world -- have just started to create and set up a new political body from their conquest
chooses the easier, assimilative way and makes Aegon his heir. And he will continue to try to make what he thinks are the easier, safer decisions, the ones that he thinks will inspire admiration through his agreeableness and constant appeasing "strategy".
But he still needs to both preserve Targaryen domination/rule over Westeros AND maintain their hold on the house’s biggest practical asset and cultural identity marker: dragonriding (as the whole point of Valyrian dragonlords marrying their siblings, aunts, and uncles was to preserve their magical ability to ride and command dragons). So he marries his son Aegon to his daughter Rhaena thinking that he sufficiently satisfied those two requirements or pressures--a man rules (Andal) but marries his sister (Targ/Valyrian dragonlord) and that in other policies, actions, words, etc. Thinking in this way, he could"convince" Westerosi peoples that this was just a thing he had the “right” to do because he was king and had already satisfied a principal cultural practice.
The problem is that he seemed to ignore just how much influence the Andal religion would have even in the aftermath of a conquest and did not closer inspect how beneficial his mother’s and Visenya’s shared contributions had towards Aegon’s rule. That he never developed a good balance between the need for dynastic security vs love from the public/validation for his rule. And that it’s actually unfortunate that he didn’t have a sister to marry so that this problem could be directly addressed during Aegon I’s time.
So he did nothing to secure the lives and claims of his children, and failed at both the security and love bits. And sacrificed his daughter’s claim to create this false political balance. An opportunity to create more candidates and widen the chance of having more competent or safer options for a ruler. Aside from more evenly dispensing power and improving the lives of Westerosi women decade by decade.
Jaehaerys’ Relationship with his Family Pre-Scandal
To make this clear, this is the person who is most at fault for the Dance if the Dragons. His misogyny ruined it all.
A)
Unlike Aenys I and Aegon I, Jaehaerys did have a sister (2) and did have daughters (5 into adulthood). However, he comes from a completely very different set of circumstances. One of being exposed to the threat of death almost from his early late “preteens” and early teens.
Jaehaerys’ mother Alyssa had to leave his brother Viserys behind to save him and his sister while his uncle definitely would have held them all hostage and used their lives to threaten his opponents. Jaehaerys, from an early age (before 15) was vulnerable to the instability of a violent rule (Maegor) which itself came to be from a poorly managed and unfirm rule (Aenys). So we see through his thoroughness and use of both "soft power" (sending people out to teach crowds about how to look at Targ sibling marriages using Faith principles, eloquent speakers who happen to be Faith-aligned-or-vocated; got a more tolerant High Septon) and "hard power" (military intimidation with the Faith and dragons) to stabilize his rule and publicly validate his fitness for the other Westerosi lords, that Jaehaerys valued expediency in the form of male rule (LINK):
The difference between soft and hard power in international politics is the use of force. Soft power resources are the attractive attributes of a country—such as a civil society, human rights, and opportunities for individual success—that inspire other countries to want the same goals.
On the other hand, hard power coerces compliance through inducements such as military force, economic sanctions, or the control of exports to compel policymakers in other countries to acquiesce. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, during which Russia successfully annexed Crimea, is an example of hard power that led to the largest territorial gain by force since the end of World War II. The United States invading Iraq is another example of hard power.
[...]
5 Examples of Soft Power
Business and trade: This type of soft power centers on the allure of a country’s business acumen, the success of its economy, and its ability to innovate. Japan, for example, wields great powers in business because of its high levels of investment and many globally recognizable electronics and auto industry companies.
Culture: This is a country’s power to influence others through its cultural riches, such as art, literature, music, or even pop culture. American soft power includes popular media like movies, music, and television. The European Union attracts admirers with its art, music, and architecture. Korea’s K-pop music attracts fans from around the globe with its catchy tunes and charismatic performers.
Education: Educational soft power is when a country becomes a desirable destination for international studies due to high-quality institutions and scholars. Some countries, including the United States, attract many international students.
Governance: Soft power in governance means respect for freedom and democracy for citizens, resulting in a civil society. For example, US foreign policy supports human rights and international law.
International relations and diplomacy: Public diplomacy in foreign affairs and contributions to global development are potent sources of soft power. Being able to handle public affairs, like international conflicts between superpowers, with diplomacy is a soft power.
AND (LINK):
[Soft power] is the ability of a nation to exert control by economic, political, moral or cultural means.
And that inevitably included adopting the Westerosi practice of restricting and controlling their female relatives’ bodies more than their sons, since female heirs are not seen as strong or competent leaders and thought of as weakening the house’ hold on power...because the dominant order already ruled that daughters could not autonomously inherit or even have a role without being sexually tied and bound to a man in some way, whether that being from his loins, having his children/being married to him, or being his mother.
B)
While Alysanne was involved with Jaehaerys’ policies, she never had the sort of law-making power that Rhaenys and Visenya exercised.
I assume this is because after Maegor's putting the realm on its toes, Jaehaerys wished to make sure that the Targs could live as much as themselves and remain in power with the threat while coexisting with the Faith, hence the Doctrine of Exceptionalism allowing the Targs from then on to marry their siblings without real protest of interference like before Jaehaerys's generation. And considering how he came into the throne not totally of his own volition at 14 years of age (his mother put him there partially to ensure his and Alysanne's safety as well as revenge; the various lords would likely not have wanted a 6-7 yr old over an older candidate--though of course, they sighed gratefully for a boy over a girl). If he had said that they should instead crown Aerea (who was still with Maegor at this point, along with Rhaena, her mother/his eldest sibling) to the group of men and his mother, it's not likely that they'd take him seriously or allow him to step away. And after losing his older brothers' to violent ends (Viserys and Aegon) Jaehaerys would have had another layer of incentive to ensure the security and longevity of the Targ dynasty/whatever family he would build. How? Make compromises with the Faith, Andal patriarchal mores, made sure his relatives did nothing to debilitate or make him appear weak--while using force when necessary/simultaneously. The "balance" favored patriarchy, obviously, but there was an edge he was walking and continued to feel even after he grew more into adulthood and more faith was put into his leadership abilities. The ghost of what could have happened and what has happened obviously followed the guy into his death, manifesting in his mishandling of his own children and the existence of the Great Council.
Going back to his wife, Alicent never actually wrote or made any of her suggestions into any laws by herself but put forth ideas to the council and Jaehaerys. Most times this was not hard to do because she didn't often confront those things that would make them have to change or abolish long-running Andal/Faith customs and injustices or those that give them more power. Jaehaerys never gave her an official, independent position in the council and largely ignored her when he didn't like her ideas or when they didn't support his conciliatory (placating the Andal-descent lords) purposes and goals (Daenerys, Rhaenys passed over and his reluctance with the abolishment of the right of the first night). The guy absolutely made an unconventional council that included a woman, a common-born septon, and a foreign Essosi businessman who were all instrumental, showing his intelligence and ability to discern what he needed in advisors and find competent persons around him. He didn't limit himself in this regard. He made sure Westerosi would have its first intraregional road system--or the beginning of one--which would have improved the transport of goods and persons and thus boosted the economies of various places, allowing people to have more choices in where they settle, and making sure KL/the court especially got their suppplies. Thus I'd assume that court life became much more robust, people communicated more easily, and Jaehaerys was easily able to perform royal progress. All of this made the king-subject relationship that much closer, as people would see their king more often and feel his presence, be heard, and feel as if they mattered.
It's his domestic life where he really fumbles the bag, but how he treated his daughters (and the bookish, non-conforming son Vaegon in Vaegon's childhood) also contributed to the trend of Targaryen women/nearly half of the Targs being oppressed and unable to really participate in the family's political sustenance as Visenya and Rhaenys did.
And we hear of no preparation made for their daughters. This follows the declining trend of Targaryen men intentionally leaving out Targaryen women more and more from active politics.
D)
Therefore, in his bid to solidify the Targ dynasty by investing more responsibility and power in his sons than his daughters, Jaehaerys intellectually neglected his daughters and left them to be more passive members of the family for marriage alliances. To him, his daughters were to be quiet actors or extraneous pieces to be told what to do and who to marry only. Girls were more to be seen and not heard.
Because they were not allowed to:
actively make political decisions or learn to rule in some way (even as a female head of house like any other lord, general, etc.) like Rhaenyra at Dragonstone
or even sit as Alysanne did at councils whether to suggest or be as Rhaenyra was and be cupbearers to hear them deliberate and learn
Jaehaerys did not feel the need to actually understand how they thought about their rights, their autonomy, what their parents owed them, etc. Until he was blindsided.
Jaehaerys was pushed toward but also nurtured his own blindspot. He created daughters he was unfamiliar with that he could not understand. And them not being able to really understand him (except maybe Maegelle).
Moreover, his seeking to maintain control and power justified his treating her as an anomaly or a threat to his power and authority, instead of as his daughter.
For that matter, there is no indication that Jaehaerys ever really spent enough special, family-bonding time with his kids, again, his daughters especially. His sons were active political participants whom he interacted with more because of said politics: Aemond and Baelon both served as his Hands and Jaehaerys went to Vaegon for advice over the succession after Baelon's death even after he had been sent to the Citadel and Jaehaerys had already tried to get that guy interested in swordplay more over books. Maegelle helped her parents to tolerate each other again, but she, like the rest of her sisters, did not participate in political decision-making and wars. Despite the fact those daughters very well could/would have been dragonriders.
Their children would have grown up with septas, maids, and wetnurses more than with their parents for education and everyday care both because of the social expectations of their class and the real duties of a King AND how Alysanne, as Queen Consort/a noblewoman was not expected/somewhat discouraged to be as involved as a commonborn mother in her kids' daily lives (assuming from real life medieval history) and she at least was more in the council or on a mission by herself than any other Queen Consort after her (Alaric and the Gift). Both as a noble/royal man and a King, Jaehaerys wouldn't have been around his children in general, Alysanne, as a noble/royal lady, also would not. (Compared to a common-born woman.)
But compared to Jaehaerys, Alysanne could and did spend more time with their kids than him due to her duties as the Consort/"lady of the castle" and not a law-maker herself. Even with the great number of kids, she appeared to get to know them as individuals better than Jaehaerys: how Alyssa and Baelon married, Viserra's conflicts with her, Daella's caretaking and time spent with her, her observing Saera and (again) often comparing her to Aerea to Jaehaerys as if he weren't there to see it for himself, and this:
[...] long before she was half-grown, Saera had learned the art of getting anything she wanted from her father: a kitten, a hound, a pony, a hawk, a horse (Jaehaerys did draw a firm line at the elephant). Queen Alysanne was far less gullible, however, and Septon Barth tells us that Saera’s sisters all misliked her to various degrees.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
So it's not all due to Jaehaerys' position and myriad duties, progresses, and projects as a King that drew him away from his kids. So much as his belief in how much he should/could invest himself in his children's everyday lives, even coming from their young-young childhoods. And Alysanne was mostly left with the task of arranging her kids’ marriages and doing so based on what she observed of their personalities and needs, while Jaehaerys didn’t really contribute insights any deeper than Daella being scared of a lot of things, for example.
Here is another example of Jaehaerys being unaware of his own kids:
The frustrations started with Vaegon and Daella. Only a year apart in age, the prince and princess seemed well matched as babes, and the king and queen assumed that the two of them would eventually marry. Their older siblings Baelon and Alyssa had become inseparable, and plans were already being made for them to wed. Why not Vaegon and Daella as well? “Be sweet to your little sister,” King Jaehaerys told the prince when he was five. “One day she will be your Alysanne.”
As the children grew, however, it became apparent that the two of them were not ideally suited. There was no warmth between them, as the queen saw plainly. Vaegon tolerated his sister’s presence, but never sought it out. Daella seemed frightened of her sour, bookish brother, who would sooner read than play. The prince thought the princess stupid; she thought him mean. “They are only children,” Jaehaerys said when Alysanne brought the problem to his attention. “They will warm to one another in time.” They never did. If anything, their mutual dislike only deepened.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
He was taken completely by surprise, in utter shock that Saera was capable of the lies, the self-preserving performance, and just the act of "giving away her virginity" to any guy she fancied without parental (a father's actually) permission. One could say that it was at that moment Jaehaerys realized how little he actually knew his daughter. Alysanne was never as surprised as him:
"'True?' said Saera. It was in that moment, with that word, that the contempt came out. “No. I gave it to all three. They all think they were the first. Boys are such silly fools.” Jaehaerys was so horrified he could not speak, but the queen kept her composure. 'You are very proud of yourself, I see. A woman grown, and nearly seven-and-ten. I am sure you think you have been very clever, but it is one thing to be clever and another to be wise. What do you imagine will happen now, Saera?'"
"Queen Alysanne was less convinced. 'Saera is clever, but not wise,' she told the king. Lady Perianne and Lady Alys were pretty, vapid, empty-headed little fools from what she had seen of them, whilst Connington and Mooton were callow boys. 'And I do not like this Stinger. I’ve heard he sired a bastard in the Reach, and another here in King’s Landing.'"
"When the queen told him what she had learned, King Jaehaerys could scarce credit a word of it.
It could be said that a feudal man's (or man living in a patriarchal world) grief would not be recorded or paid attention to as faithfully as a woman's since it is more expected from mother's and women, but seeing as to how Gyldayn and Septon Barth both do not stop themselves from detailing Jaehaerys' behavior throughout his reign (his dealings with Rogar, the progress after the First Quarrel, his interactions with his council members), I don't think that's not a strong or plausible enough argument.
There is also the previous embarrassment and scandal of Lucamore Strong, a man who had taken the Kingsguard's celibacy vows yet married three different women and fathered more than 10 kids collectively. Lucamore's actions arguably reflected badly on Jaehaerys, as Lucamore did all of this without Jaehaerys never coming to know of it, some people around and in the court might think. Lucamore also "soiled" his Seven-anointed position and vows, so that "stain" is also joined with Jaehaerys' reputation. Notice how Alysanne says she doesn't want Lucamore "near" Jaehaerys ever again?
Saera’s Scandal
A)
This is one opinion of Alysanne and Saera:
I agree that Jaehaerys ignored & neglected Saera--while not perfect in the emotional department, Alysanne was actually the more emotionally and physically engaged parent and the one who constantly observed several things about their children while Jaehaerys did jack. even just consulting and checking in with the nanny-servants, etc. (I have a myriad of examples peppered throughout the analysis below, so I won’t mention them here. Enough that a pattern and truth emerge.)
Secondly, Jaehaerys was never willing to marry Saera off to any of the three men she slept with because of two possible things: either he felt this was conceding to what he believed was Saera's threatening insubordination after her refusal to regret or be ashamed for her sexual defiance and for the marrying all 3 comments "like Maegor" (the guy Jaehaerys no doubt feared and hated in his earlier memories) OR he thought it would get out that Saera was "ruined" and further taint the Targ family by having not even been possibly tied to the guy who "took" her virginity. She refused to name who exactly did if she even knows...as it's very possible that she was drunk and incognizant during that encounter. We must remember the group was visiting taverns and brothels, where alcohol often is. He actually outright refused to do so after she said that she was willing to marry any or all three (QUOTE), which is fair because such a thing would cause a greater scandal than Maegor (because she is female, such a thing couldn't happen especially since all those boys marrying her would introduce problems of subservience and more possible claimants than one would need or handle possibly disrupting the main line Jaehaerys intended) and because of Maegor's legacy. [More on Saera, Maegor, & Jaehaerys under " " below]
He only gave two options to Connington: the Night’s Watch or a ten-year exile, and the latter chose exile only to die before it ended. He "dueled" with Beesbury and killed him. And he married Mooton to Perianne Moore. Alysanne never ever said no to a marriage between her daughter and any of the three boys. She's not even consulted, it seems, perhaps because she knew that Jaehaerys would not budge or perhaps she even agreed a little with him. I lean towards the latter because her language when describing Saera is disparaging (later in this post--section B).
It's interesting, bc while Saera's "innocence" and childhood are being stripped from his purview, he might have felt the loss of his own all over again from that Maegor comment.
Saera mentioning Maegor and likening herself to the man who terrorized his closest family--even killing two of their brothers/Saera's uncles--is her definitely trying to hurt and get a reaction from her parents while also trying to foist off the pressure of accountability (bc while I'm still all for female sexual autonomy, it's clear Saera was practicing something much more self-harmful and abusive towards others). Like a lot of teen girls, especially those who do not feel OR are not actually given enough regard or allowed to do some things fulfilling or expressive of trust and care, she sought Jaehaerys and Alysanne's attention by hurting & upsetting them. And I'm sure Jaehaerys' emotional absence and giving her things rather than attention comes from the lack of time he spared, how many kids he foisted onto Alysanne to birth and risked her life to give PLUS him not really feeling he needed to invest in Saera beyond her being marriageable for the sake of alliances for the dynasty/family's seat…this would be the stuff that he or some readers could also use to excuse not really thinking about any other perspective other than his own. We see that a lot in people (esp men).
So her "traumatizing" Jaehaerys--a 30+ man who has real authority over others, the time to form better connections to those around him with some other than giving them roles, and thus the responsibility to not lose his cool against a teen girl--is both real in the sense that she could have realized mentioning Maegor to one of those who he would have killed given the chance was not fait & could be upsetting... but why is she so desperate? Why does she want to or okay with maybe hurting her father? What is Jaehaerys doing to elicit such a response from his teenage daughter?
(One who is also citing actual Valyrian customs, even if we must consider if said customs have women having multiple husbands AS WELL AS men having multiple wives. In canon, it just says "sorcerers" without gender for those who did so in Valyria. And those who had multiple "wives" in the houses of the dragonlords, which seems like it was men having multiple spouses. Again, this was an opportunity to create something new in Westeros, in the Targ dynasty. I assume that Jaehaerys thought it both outside of a woman's privilege AND a risk too great for the power he himself had in this "ultra" patriarchal world.)
AND Jaehaerys never sought to figure out why and how Saera turned out the way she did. Perhaps it is asking too much out of a feudal man/King to actually get to know and keep track of his daughter's emotional well-being/motivations…but then we have Viserys, who still not the best father, remained arguably closer to and comparatively left more room for autonomy for his daughter Rhaenyra than Jaehaerys ever did for Saera, and we know it's possible.
Again, yes the trauma from Maegor and having to be the "best" man and "best", ideal sort of man for others to consider him a true king as well as people like Rogar and his mother not giving him much choice because there was no real choice--all of which happening while he was under 17---and thus that war trauma that Viserys nor Saera simply never experienced. I don't think this overpowers or matters more than the bad handling after he supposedly "calms down" that some people feel happens after he sends Saera to be punished. It's like he defaulted to battle mode with her for the sake of appearances. Should Jaehaerys have introduced more violence to Saera, psychologically and physically in response?! His own daughter? Obviously, it didn't work, and it was his (& a bit of his wife-sister's) responsibility.
Thirdly, while Alysanne did say that Saera should be punished for sleeping around, can we really exclude the pressure of Jaehaerys having punished Saera even worse if Alysanne had not been a mediating party? And as I already stated, Jaehaerys had all the ability to engage with all his kids and actually understand them -- that’s not on Alysanne. But Jaehaerys already unconsciously assigned his daughter specific roles (overriding their personalities and even personhood) before ever actually knowing the ones that came with them. Again, he had made sure that the family and their roles were shaped around his political needs more than finding that balance between love and security. He is the king and he already had a history of sidelining his female relatives for his own hold of power--Rhaena and Dragonstone/Franklyn Farman. He has more power than any person in his family, both Andal custom and he made himself the patriarch of said family. He determines/ed the shape of the domestic realm in his own castle through those familial connections that he is responsible -- at the end of the day -- for arranging and controlling. Just to repeat myself.
Fourthly, Jaehaerys has always shown a force of will that even butted against Alysanne: Daenerys being named heir, Rhaenys (before GC of 101), Saera. Against his sister Rhaena and her relationships with all three Farmans and the deal with the lost dragon eggs. He was ready to fly to Essos or wherever those eggs ended up and threaten whoever had them with war and dragonfire if they refused to give them back, considering them stolen goods of the Targs.
I'm sure that the reason that Jaehaerys was not so willing to back ALysanne in the clear desire of putting girls into the Citadel to become maesters themselves was because of that tenuous, nearly new "truce" and understanding between him and the Faith through the Doctrine. Introducing girls into the Citadel versus snatching the privilege to practice sibling marriage in one's own house are different in that Jaehaerys would be making stark, critical changes in a whole other ancient (1000s-year-old) institution. the Doctrine was more him making changes for him and his own "neck of the woods", his own family and dynasty, the place where he had the most authority Ironically enough, his descendant Baelor I would go on to burn several Citadel books he claimed were heretical and his ability to do so speaks to the affordance Jaehaerys set up for Targs + royal privilege + his clear, even if zealous, devotion to the Faith + people trying to stay away from even more martial conflict [the Dance and the Dornish battles from Daeron I]; books versus allowing a girl to be a maester are conveyed as two very different things--girls simply were not thought of as intellectual beings and Alysanne was felt as the "exception". We see that Alysanne struggled with feeling in control and having power or being recognized enough through her interactions with the maesters at Oldtown:
[...] Queen Alysanne remained in Oldtown. The silent sisters hosted her in their motherhouse for a day of prayer and contemplation. Another day she spent with the septas who cared for the city’s sick and destitute. Amongst the novices she met was her niece Rhaella, whom Her Grace pronounced a learned and devout young woman “though much given to stammers and blushes.” For three days she lost herself in the Citadel’s great library, emerging only to attend lectures on the Valyrian dragon wars, leechcraft, and the gods of the Summer Isles.
Afterward she feasted the assembled archmaesters in their own dining hall, and even presumed to lecture them. “If I had not become queen, I might have liked to be a maester,” she told the Conclave. “I read, I write, I think, I am not afraid of ravens...or a bit of blood. There are other highborn girls who feel the same. Why not admit them to your Citadel? If they cannot keep up, send them home, the way you send home boys who are not clever enough. If you would give the girls a chance, you might be surprised by how many forge a chain.” The archmaesters, loath to gainsay the queen, smiled at her words and bobbed their heads and assured Her Grace that they would consider her proposal.
(Birth, Death, and Betrayal Under King Jaehaerys I)
“Presumed”. “Loath to gainsay”. “Consider”. “Why not admit them...?” the question never addressed. All to say this was a moment where Alysanne tried to assert herself and had no effect without Jaehaerys attached.
So I ask...how does Alysanne truly have enough recognition/authority to override Jaehaerys’s stubbornness and will as (Visenya did to Aegon I)? To gainsay him against his intentions towards Beesbury? Did she feel always comfortable pushing him outside of the council room and inside the "domestic", child-rearing, family stuff? Her being told they could get more kids despite her saying she couldn't anymore and there is no recorded response (could've been tired from labor, but no comeback?).
Especially with how angry and humiliated Jaehaerys felt, how determined he was to eliminate the perceived threat to his authority and power?
Fifthly, it is after Saera escapes from her imprisonment the first time and tries to go to the Dragonpit AND Jaehaerys kills Beesbury that he, not Alysanne, sends his daughter into the Faith:
A fortnight later, Jaehaerys and Alysanne gave another of their daughters over to the Faith. Princess Saera, who was not quite seventeen, departed King’s Landing for Oldtown, where her sister Septa Maegelle was to take charge of her instruction. She would be a novice, it was announced, with the silent sisters.
Septon Barth, who knew the king’s mind better than most, would later maintain the sentence was meant to be a lesson. No one could mistake Saera for her sister Maegelle, least of all her father. She would never be a septa, much less a silent sister, but she required punishment, and it was thought that a few years of silent prayer, harsh discipline, and contemplation would be good for her, that it would set her on the path to redemption.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
This emphasis on “king’s mind” lets us know that Jaehaerys was the one who made the decision or was the one pushing for and made the final choice to make Saera go to the septas. And Barth makes it clear: to “re-educate” her to make her more amenable towards Jaehaerys’ desires. Even if Alysanne was the one to suggest slow “redemption”, at that point she was doing all she could make keep Saera there, which involved placating Jaehaerys.
B)
Alysanne did seem to have fraught and complicated relationships with her daughters while expressing dread with their willfulness (the post I’m responding to): Viserra and her not wanting the marriage with Manderly and Saera, her whole life being compared to the dead and “unmanageable” Aerea.
Alysanne constantly compares her to Aerea, as if it were a bad thing. Implying that Saera was too "willful" and hard to manage...which admittedly shows that Alysanne still has this bit of prejudice (and internalized misogyny) towards women and girls who display noncompliance and nonquietness despite her castigating Rhaena for disparaging the absent Aerea and her taking out Balerion and running away...Alysanne saying that Aerea was "just a child" to Rhaena's "what kind of monster" she brought to life who would take the dragon who killed her father (Aegon the Uncrowned) of all the dragons she could have claimed. A frustrated rage of a person who didn’t get to really raise her own daughters for the sake of their survival but never bonded with them properly afterward.
It looks like Alysanne also inherited troubles with daughters that she rebuked and blamed Rhaena for. More than Rhaena does Aerea, though Alysanne abjects Saera into a monstrous feminine figure all throughout her childhood (while Rhaena's treatment of Aerea is arguably more sympathetic since Rhaena's *trauma* at Mageor's hands and her separation from her daughter, her daughter growing apart from her in that separation. A separation where they both lived conscious lives apart and long enough for them to be near strangers to each other).
How did Alysanne go from defending Aerea to her mother for claiming a dragon and running away to calling her Aerea-like with anxiety...and then had her own broken relationship with said daughter end with her also trying to run away on dragonback?!
When she actually sat with her children and had to manage them mostly on her own while Jaehaerys did whatsoever. Growing up and raising children more and more within the confines of the castle and royal court, where the customs would be observed and practiced more, Alysanne also grew to mentally and habitually adopt ideas and behaviors more than before Jaehaerys took the throne back.
C)
Though Jaehaerys had forbidden it, Alysanne had defied his edict and secretly engaged agents to keep watch over her wayward child across the narrow sea. Saera was still in Lys, she knew from their reports, still at the pleasure garden. Now twenty years of age, she oft entertained her admirers still garbed as a novice of the Faith; there were evidently a good many Lyseni who took pleasure in ravishing innocent young women who had taken vows of chastity, even when the innocence was feigned.
It was her grief over the loss of Princess Viserra that finally drove the queen to approach Jaehaerys about Saera once again. She brought Septon Barth along with her, to speak on the virtues of forgiveness and the healing properties of time. Only when Barth had finished did Her Grace mention Saera’s name. “Please,” she begged the king, “it is time to bring her home. She has been punished enough, surely. She is our daughter.”
Jaehaerys would not be moved. “She is a Lyseni whore,” His Grace replied. “She opened her legs for half my court, threw an old woman down the steps, and tried to steal a dragon. What more do you require? Have you given any thought as to how she got to Lys? She had no coin. How do think she paid for her passage?”
The queen cringed at the harshness of his words, but still she would not yield. “If you will not bring Saera home for love of her, bring her home for love of me. I need her.”
“You need her as a Dornishman needs a pit viper,” Jaehaerys said. “I am sorry. King’s Landing has sufficient whores. I do not wish to hear her name again.” With those words, he rose to leave, but at the door he halted and turned back. “We have been together since we were children. I know you as well as you know me. Right now you are thinking that you do not need my leave to bring her home, that you can take Silverwing and fly to Lys yourself. What would you do then, visit her in her pleasure garden? Do you imagine she will fly into your arms and beg forgiveness? She is more like to slap your face. And what will the Lyseni do, if you try and make off with one of their whores? She has value to them. How much do you think it costs to lay with a Targaryen princess? At best they will demand a ransom for her. At worst they may decide to keep you too. What will you do then, shout for Silverwing to burn their city down? Would you have me send Aemon and Baelon with an army, to see if they can prise her free? You want her, yes, I hear you, you need her…but she does not need you, or me, or Westeros. She is dead. Bury her.”
Queen Alysanne did not fly to Lys, but neither did she ever quite forgive the king for the words he spoke that day. Plans had been under way for some time for the two of them to make another progress the following year, returning to the westerlands for the first time in twenty years. Shortly after their falling out, the queen informed Jaehaerys that he should go alone. She was going back to Dragonstone, alone, to grieve for their dead daughters.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
I agree with Jaehaerys that Saera wouldn’t (at first) willingly go back to the Keep but not totally or what people may probably at first think.
While Jaehaerys ignored Saera except when he gave her gifts and overly spoiled her, Alysanne didn’t seem to encourage Jaehaerys to spend more time with his daughters bc she ane we know that he wouldn't be that willing. Alyssa is an interesting situation -- too young to be married...but Alysanne married at 13 -- to Alyssa’s 15 -- to 15-year-old Jaehaerys by her own full will and managed to birth children well enough, so why should she deprive her daughter what she fought for herself (thinking in Alysanne’s POV)? And again, by the large Westerosi standards, 15 is actually a safer place to begin birthing and being married. So to Alysanne and in context of the circumstances/society/world, we shouldn't castigate Alysanne for trying to do what most lords wouldn't try to do for their daughters--give them happiness and safety AND not make it subject to the dynastic/house needs. While Alysanne seemed to have done little to nothing to protect her daughters from being married too soon or married to too-old men (she actually tried with Daella and wanted Gael with her always, even if that last one was sort-kinda for Alicent's to be comforted with her losses and assure herself that she still had living kids by keeping one close to her), Alysanne herself was also married at 13! Not only did she, like most Westerosi, think that she was creating both advantages for her daughters and the Targ house, but she has also always been Jaehaerys’ “helpmeet” more than his equal.
Alysanne frequently wanted and expressed Jaehaerys to consider his eldest Daenerys his heir and pleaded with him several times to allow Saera back. Jaehaerys is and was always the one to refuse when he felt his authority was on the line. And as I said before, Alysanne was always the one who needed to persuade him nor had the power that Visenya or Rhaenys had. Of course, until she thought she couldn't go past a certain line where Jaehaerys would not be persuaded by her anymore...unless it was Barth or another. Ugh.
Alysanne was often reacting and deferring to him since both were in their teens. We must remember that they married when she was 13 and he 15! And ever since then (a little while after), she has been popping out child after child, even when she told Jaehaerys she couldn't anymore and he dismissed it saying that their mother (who died of childbirth) was able so she could still do it in her 40s. some of these births were stillborns or kids who didn't live past 1.5 years!
Alysanne did not have the ability to order her isolated imprisonment w/o Jaenaerys' say-so/approval. Nor the deicison to force Saera a septa/nun. Nor was she the person who forced her to watch as one of her favorites/lovers was killed. Alysanne may have brought her in front of Jaehaerys, but all that came afterward was his doing and his determination or action.
Alysanne was unwillingly separated from her TWICE and tried many times to get Jaehaerys to be gentler even before Saera fled.
Her Grace’s words were soft and gentle, and Jaehaerys was moved by them, Septon Barth tells us. Alysanne was stubborn and persistent and she had a way of bringing the king around to her own point of view, no matter how far apart they had been at the start. Given time, she might have softened his stance on Saera as well.
She would not have that time. That very night, Princess Saera sealed her fate. Instead of remaining in her rooms as she had been instructed, she slipped away whilst visiting the privy, donned a washerwoman’s robes, stole a horse from the stables, and escaped the castle. She got halfway across the city, to the Hill of Rhaenys, but as she tried to enter the Dragonpit, she was found and taken by the Dragonkeepers and returned to the Red Keep.
Alysanne wept when she heard, for she knew her cause was hopeless. Jaehaerys was hard as stone. “Saera with a dragon,” was all he had to say. “Would she have taken Balerion as well, I wonder?” This time the princess was not allowed to return to her own chambers. She was confined to a tower cell instead, with Jonquil Darke guarding her day and night, even in the privy.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
So while Alysanne definitely had room to dissuade Jaehaerys (and she did try), all major, life-changing conflicts happened between father and daughter, at the father's insistence. He was the stopper, so to speak. And all was done after his own will.
To make it seem as if this situation is more about Alysanne and Saera is very much a subtler form of victim-blaming.
So it’s actually mostly because Jaehaerys’s lack of regard for Saera that I think she wouldn’t want to go back. And when Jaehaerys implies to Alysanne that it mostly her fault that Saera wouldn’t come back, it is a manipulation of half truths. He is removing himself from that equation while being the key to Saera’ dissapearance.
He is the king who expressly took actions to consolidate power and authority for himself both broadly and intimately. Everything leads to him and is allowed by him. And he was the one who decided to put male-rule and ruling over getting to know his own kids.
And let’s say that Alysanne did go to Lys and retrieve Saera. How likely is it that the Lyseni would ever try to hold Alysanne hostage or try to make her into a sex slave when they know she is Jaehaerys’ wife and Queen? They are royal and prosperous as well; they could definitely pay off anything they needed to to get Saera back. there was not even an attempt -- we’re not going to even see if these people will be intimidated with the prospect of Targ dragons alone enough to give this one girl up? The Lysene/Lyseni would react to an action, and if Saera actually mattered more than reputation (because even if she never married, she’d at least be set up without having to resort to dangerous sex work).
To me, the last sentence especially was Alysanne throwing Jaehaerys' words back at him. If Saera is "dead", someone must acknowledge her importance as a daughter, implying Jaehaerys' lacking and underperformance as a father. Particularly with his characterizing Saera as an "exotic weapon"/femme fatale/monstrous feminine (HERE and HERE) instead of his own flesh and blood. And it's compacted with her refusal/inability to travel with him as she did before in their other royal progresses.
D)
Saera's personality and motivations, HERE, HERE, and HERE. Barth and Grand Maester Elysar’s perspectives of her HERE.
Saera was never an altruistic person and was a bully towards her sister and her favorites, even sexually coercive & violent to Alys Turnberry and Perianne Moore, almost like Cersei & Taena and Cersei looking for power through sexual sadism (at least Taena was a person trying to get something out of her interaction w/Cersei and was playing her)..., but even that goes back to how there was a competition for attention and favor between them all (even if Daella may not have actively sought it) from the court or their parents. We often talk about Aemon and Baelon’s friendly & competitive relationship; what about these girls?
Headcanon: And as I mentioned before, it's very possible that in her escapades with her group, even she, the princess, might have lost some control one or two nights after she bottles of alcohol and was sexually assaulted while passed out. (Don't tell GRRM, he'd probably add this to a retcon, and we don't need another gendered SA story) We'll never really know, and she herself might have had misgivings and fragments of cloudy memories she'd want to push down, thus another possible layer to her wanting control or authority. This was, after all, a teenage girl hanging out with a group of boys who already performed sexual coercion in proximity to royalty.
An attention-seeker born in the middle of a family with many, more notable siblings, Saera also didn't relate to her more laidback(?) mother. However, it seems like that quality of rebellion posed as negative was the most repeated, prominent trait that was used to describe Saera, which may be partially Gyldayn’s and time’s decay’s fault; but with how her septas and Elysar and even Alysanne cite her stubbornness and willfulness, it feels like Saera was made into a figure of repulsive rebelliousness before she ever really became one with her scandal.
And from Jaehaerys' anger and unwillingness to consider sending back for Saera on the basis that she:
To me, seems like she needed to be given some sort of continuous task or other responsibility that took up her time, focus, and energy with the promise of other favors (both material and nonmaterial) and recognition for performing those responsibilities so she's given a sense of accomplishment and worth AND learn accountability. And it had to be a thing that would attract her to begin doing. Unfortunately no one seemed to have the creativity to actually think of this nor the time to think of it, and she was left with more septas to suppress her more than to engage and negotiate with her, to really nip her horrible behavior in the bud.
was extremely disobedient and unwilling to wait for his declared release
allowed herself to have sex without permission AND sell herself for self support
would not care to ever see or count on either of them ever again
it was apparent that he did not want her actions to reflect badly on him, as every justification and his trial against Beesbury had their roots in Saera's unwillingness to conform to his and Westerosi/Andal expectations of a woman.
This is the account of Jaehaerys’ trail by combat with Braxton Beesbury:
The harshest punishment was reserved for Braxton Beesbury, the proud young knight called Stinger. “I could geld you and send you to the Wall,” Jaehaerys told him. “That was how I served Ser Lucamore, and he was a better man than you. I could take your father’s lands and castle, but there would be no justice in that. He had no part in what you did, no more than your brothers did. We cannot have you spreading tales about my daughter, though, so we mean to take your tongue. And your nose as well, I think, so you may not find the maids quite so easy to beguile. You are far too proud of your skill with sword and lance, so we will take that away from you as well. We shall break your arms and legs, and my maesters will make certain that they heal crookedly. You will live the rest of your sorry life as a cripple. Unless…”
"Unless?” Beesbury was as white as chalk. “Is there a choice?”
"Any knight accused of wrongdoing has a choice,” the king reminded him. “You can prove your innocence at hazard of your body.”
“Then I choose trial by combat,” Stinger said. He was by all accounts an arrogant young man, and sure of his skill at arms. He looked about at the seven Kingsguard standing beneath the Iron Throne in their long white cloaks and shining scale, and said, “Which of these old men do you mean for me to fight?”
“This old man,” announced Jaehaerys Targaryen. “The one whose daughter you seduced and despoiled.”
They met the next morning at dawn. The heir to Honeyholt was nineteen years of age, the king forty-nine, but still far from an old man. Beesbury armed himself with a morningstar, thinking mayhaps that Jaehaerys would be less accustomed to defending himself against that weapon. The king bore Blackfyre. Both men were well armored and carried shields. When the combat began, Stinger rushed hard at His Grace, seeking to overwhelm him with the speed and strength of youth, making the spiked ball whirl and dance and sing. Jaehaerys took every blow on his shield, however, contenting himself with defense whilst the younger man wore himself out. Soon enough the time arrived when Braxton Beesbury could scarce lift his arm, and then the king moved to the attack. Even the best of mail is hardpressed to turn Valyrian steel, and Jaehaerys knew where every weak point could be found. Stinger was bleeding from half a dozen wounds when he finally fell. Jaehaerys kicked his shattered shield away, opened the visor of his helm, laid Blackfyre’s point against his eye, and drove it deep.
Queen Alysanne did not attend the duel. She told the king she could not bear the thought that he might die. Princess Saera watched from the window of her cell. Jonquil Darke, her gaoler, made certain that she did not turn away.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
Again, we have Alysanne not stepping in to allay this anger in some way as a last act of using her role in some way as she already tried before Saera escaped. At the same time, Jaehaerys' anger was coolly and determinedly passionate and indicated both "protectiveness" that some will argue for (the same kind that people say instills men to try to block other men from "talking" to their romantic partners today) and its sinister implications. It makes me wonder--what would have happened between them if Alysanne did step in?
By how he drives Blackfyre into Braxton's eye and describes, in detail, how he will take everything precious and male- self-identifying from Braxton, it’s obvious he hate this 19-year old with a self-proving heat. The punishment was much more personal than with Lucamore Strong. It became about fixing an emasculation by emasculating/killing Braxton, the perp. (Literally "unman", which works for both castration or just killing him, which would "remove" a man from this world).
In the duel, the task was to "prove" vs "unprove". Proving through combat is to publicly show and earn the right to be acknowledged as a man, a worthy person, a knight, a warrior, etc. -- again, in the context of feudalism. Braxton tried to prove that he was worth the warrior he claimed or was reputed to be and to prove how he should be allowed to live, as the idea was that the Seven would judge him and his actions. So this was as much a test for Jaehaerys, as well, for him to "prove" his own Kingly authority -- not exactly given by the gods, but compatible with them, if one were to go back to the principles of the Doctrine. and coming from a past where his ability to confront and deal with threats suffciently was questioned by many persons:
His was no easy task, for his immediate predecessors had undone much of what the Conqueror had built, Aenys through weakness and indecision, Maegor with his bloodlust and cruelty. The realm that Jaehaerys inherited was impoverished, war-torn, lawless, and riven with division and mistrust, whilst the new king himself was a green boy with no experience of rule.
AND
Meanwhile, word of the prince’s clemency spread throughout the realm. One by one, the remainder of King Maegor’s adherents dismissed their hosts, left their castles, and made the journey to King’s Landing to swear fealty. Some did so reluctantly, fearing that Jaehaerys might prove to be as weak and feckless a king as his father...but as Maegor had left no heirs of the body, there was no plausible rival around whom opposition might gather.
(Fire and Blood; Prince into King -- The Ascension of Jaehaerys I)
Maegor dealt with challenges to his authority with the sword (for men) and torture (for women; Viserys, Aenys' son with Alyssa Velaryon, was tortured and so were others, but Maegor especially had Tyanna of the Tower and Alys Harroway tortured before killing them -- intimate partner violence and uxoricide -- for the sake of his pride [Alys was not a love match nor arranged by custom. She was a step below even that, a mere broodmare, going by how willing Maegor was to get rid of her after hearing she slept with others...a Henry VIII style]). Maegor also forced his niece/Jaehaerys' oldest sister Rhaena to become his wife to consolidate his rule through a child through her body and to make sure that she wouldn't have as many supporters for either her or her daughters. It also kept her as a hostage for said daughters' lives, thus it was easily recognizable sexual violence.
Braxton, in this Westerosi feudal context, was a threat to Jaehaerys' own masculinity and a "competitor" for Saera, the physical device of male alliance-making and authority. Her purity/virginity was supposed to be an offering and assurance of untouchedness/obedience towards her chosen husband. But since Braxton/Connington/Mooton all slept with her and prevented Jaehaerys from making that assurance and being able to use/marry off Saera by custom, they also became both competitors and unruly subjects that Jaehaerys needed to punish.
Simultaneously laying his own, oppressive claim over her and her body.
Since Saera obviously invited Braxton into sex, Jaehaerys dueling Braxton and saying he seduced Saera is really about Braxton "ruining" Saera and her marriage/female value. This brings together two things that should stay separate but where one becomes the victim of the other: the sexual activities of a young girl and her father’s political action.
The reason why Jaehaerys forces Saera to watch Beesbury's death is to instill in her responsibility for his death, but also to psychologically punish her for her suggestion to marry polygamously and using Maegor as her precedent (Jaehaerys' past aggressor) as well as her general disobedience to his rule over her body. (Targ cannibalism strikes again.) In this moment, Jaehaerys acted as Maegor would have, but psychologically.
We also saw Jaehaerys condemn the same sister's threat towards Franklyn Farman, the then Lord of Fair Isle and brother to her fled lover Elissa and dead husband Androw after Franklyn uncourteously denied her stay (he had a history of hating her and her female companions specifically for not acting "womanly" enough end "encouraging" Elissa to act the same. Rhaena, instead of him, was also the main reason why most visitors to Fair Isle came to visit).
Meanwhile, Jaehaerys unsubtly/subtly threatened Rogar with Vermithor for betraying him and seeking to make Aerea the next Queen. What's also ironic is that Rhaena was the one to threaten Rogar into never marrying again after their mother, Alyssa, died from childbirth AND was the one who gave Jaehaerys and Alysanne their dragons when they were born...Rhaena was the one who unintentionally became the precedent for cradle-bonding, so Jaehaerys, right from the start, always had a dragon and knew what it felt like to ride and use said dragon, the prime element/means of Targ and Jaehaerys' power and dominance over the other Westerosi.
Saera's taking multiple male lovers/sexual coercion of her female favorites, her seeming unwillingness to apologize through obedience or words, her mention, and use of Maegor, and her attempt to claim a dragon and really escape were also taken as challenges to or undermine Jaehaerys' fatherly/Kingly authority. Because her "looseness" defies marital assignment used for creating alliances and lineages, which support the King's/male-lead house's future created by said King. So him killing Beesbury in front of her eyes was also Jaehaerys reestablishing his dominance/rule over her body and sexual future/activity. In a way, Jaehaerys is reclaiming the body of his own daughter for himself. It was also publicly hammered in Jaehaerys' rule to others and to himself.
Braxton, as messed up as it was, was also one of Saera's means of self empowerment in lieu of her increasing suppression and others’ frustration with her since she was a small child. Again, the sexual activities they all had solidified her control and beat back whatever feelings of inadequacy she felt. By killing Braxton in front of her, Jaehaerys also gave her a clear view of the destruction of one of her means of said empowerment.
I refer back to blankwhiteshield’s post HERE about Cersei, Daenerys, Jaime, and Aerys II. Excerpt:
You can have an irredeemable and evil character that the patriarchy still suppresses and affects the psychology of immensely, rendering her a bigger monster. The commentary on the destructive capacity of static social constructs is not lost as a result. A character can turn into the devil of the story due to a world that ceaselessly strips her of her humanity, as well as as a result of the choices she actively makes. Cersei has shown to be capable of cruelty even before her trauma (how she treated Tyrion, her extreme narcissism, throwing her best friend down a well), but this does not change anything. Being a perpetrator does not negate her victimhood, and vice versa. It is also her stubbornness and power hunger that leave her to her ruin in a world that does not allow her the ‘freedom’ or ‘power’ that she desperately desires. It becomes the worst combination of nature and nurturer.
Unlike Maegor, Jaehaerys is an example of a King who used both physical and emotional tactics -- hard vs soft power (Doctrine of Exceptionalism/propaganda/the Seven elocutors he sent out to advertise such doctrine) to get his way and solidify his rule. Which was almost very effective for him since it uses both persuasion and adoption along with well-placed, justified violence to become the new normal. But that is what makes Jaehaerys’ actions more sinister, as his children cannot be managed the exact same ways as politics. He’s too close to them, those who could support or break down his hold on power and his public image more than anyone else.
And with Saera, who was his own child and is female, such an end is unfit for her as punishment and power-consolidation. So he must reject her and abject her into something “monstrous” -- the “slut”.
She also decides to blast through and give up her family, her royal claim, etc. And I can't exactly blame her (despite my dislike of her) since her total separation from everyone except an intimidating warrior, Jaehaerys ignoring her pleas, and her absolutely hearing of his displeasure, couples with her seeing his trial by combat with one of her lovers. PLUS their obvious lack of real connection before her being caught would have impressed more real fear onto her than anything she would have been able to emotionally deal with. thus the need to escape and get away from her new imprisonment.
She reminds me a lot of modern teenage runaways who leave home because of abuse of any and all kinds and get into serious trouble...except she was arguably luckier to establish her own business, growing from her past royal/septa image appeal. Unlike numerous other women in the ASoIaF world’s sex trade, Saera was either/both extremely lucky or very clever to avoid death and sex slavery.
(She didn’t actually become sexually “liberated” until she managed to develop her own business and had her lovers on her own time and will. She didn’t find sexual "liberation" as soon as she ran away -- just wanted to emphasize that. Again, similar to how teenage runaways do not have sexual liberation when they run away and use sex work to support themselves. Plus, how did she get those sex workers under her employ in Volantis, a slave city?)
Therefore, it is very understandable how Alicent was desperate to get her back aside from her other kids dying -- she didn't expect Saera to turn up or maybe anticipate Saera being in danger down the line? Or those things just would have made her more fearful that such would happen to Saera.
Targ Succession in Jaehaerys/Alysanne’s Hands
And so it looks like Jaehaerys is trying to convince both himself and Alysanne that they are both better off without Saera. Or he feels that Saera could never be brought fully back into Westerosi culture and keep her dignity.
On top of the emotional violence he performed against his daughter through her isolation and her being forced to watch a man violently die by her father’s hand (when previously she would never have seen Jaehaerys so often or so angry), he aggressively denies Alysanne the ability to be close to the children they have left. Through his words to Alysanne about making as if Saera is dead, Jaehaerys tries to nullify those bonds for the sake of duty and custom...which ironically breaks down the base for the family to live and perform any sort of duty.
Part of that is because Alysanne already was the one to be the byway of Saera's fate by framing the interrogation against her sexually autonomous actions, like Jaehaerys, expecting Saera to act in line with Westerosi patriarchal restrictions on her body for the sake of a masculine claim on it that she and Jaehaerys would arrange. Similar to Alicent, actually, with how she consigns Helaena to marry her neglectful rapist brother Aegon II, Alysanne is responsible in part for Saera losing herself/getting into danger in an environment of possible extreme sexual exploitation (apart from the customary marriage-selling of children for resources and power in Westeros/ASoIaF world, of course).
Notice how their kids' fates are all to do with death in childbirth or child death AND had to do with succession and Targaryen "nature" ("inborn", bodily qualities) or prosperity: Alyssa would birth a king and a Prince Consort who would have their own conflicts that had a lot to do with succession; Daella would birth the mother of the Rhaenyra; those infant sons were Jaehaerys: preferred candidates for the throne over Daenerys, and Daenerys was the unofficial heir that Jaehaerys dearly wanted to pass over for a future son...yet her death by the shivers disease inspires a fear on Jaehaerys and conflicts with his previous belief that the Targs are immune to common human diseases...While they were a "fertile" couple, accidental tragedies and Jaehaerys' mismanagement and disconnection from his wife and children seem to reveal a hint of a dynastic and emotional breakdown for the Targs.
By ever-limiting the succession to males, the Targ males who assimilated/copied/adopted more and more into to Andal culture/style of patriarchy (Maegor, Aenys, and Jaehaerys) and two women (Alicent and Alysanne; one being the more extreme and much less aware [arguably] than the other) with selfish, internalized misogyny, there were less protection for the basis of more candidates for rulership (equal primogeniture automatically opens up more candidates for succession and inheritance while still keeping it within the family). The abusive pattern of male-relative-on-female-relative abuse continues into Aegon IV and Aerys II.
Rhaenys should have been Queen and would have been a good one. But the Great Council occurred and by narrowing the unprotected candidates for rulership, Jaehaerys also made it so that the succession and unity of the Targs would be less stable, fractious.
Comparisons to Alicent & The Legacy of Saera
To Jaehaerys, Saera became an eternal sign of an ineptness he had no idea he had before her departure. And he essentially drove away/”killed” his own family and familail connections in the effort to maintain a balance that was never based on a real balance of power within his own family.
Thereby destroying those familial bonds and depriving himself of final comforts/love for the sake of power and immediate self-satisfaction.
Jaehaerys’ Last Days
As the Old King’s strength and wits began to fail, he was oft confined to his bed. Ser Otto’s precocious fifteen-year-old daughter, Alicent, became his constant companion, fetching His Grace his meals, reading to him, helping him to bathe and dress himself. The Old King sometimes mistook her for one of his daughters, calling her by their names; near the end, he grew certain she was his daughter Saera, returned to him from beyond the narrow sea.
In the year 103 AC King Jaehaerys I Targaryen died in his bed as Lady Alicent was reading to him from Septon Barth’s Unnatural History.
(Fire and Blood; A Question of Succession)
Alicent’s Last Days
She had outlived all of her children and spent the last year of her life confined to her apartments, with no company but her septa, the serving girls who brought her food, and the guards outside her door. Books were given her, and needles and thread, but her guards said Alicent spent more time weeping than reading or sewing. One day she ripped all her clothing into pieces. By the end of the year she had taken to talking to herself, and had come to have a deep aversion to the color green.
In her last days the Queen Dowager seemed to become more lucid. “I want to see my sons again,” she told her septa, “and Helaena, my sweet girl, oh…and King Jaehaerys. I will read to him, as I did when I was little. He used to say I had a lovely voice.”
(Fire and Blood; The Hooded Hand)
Alysanne's Last Days
The last years of Alysanne Targaryen were sad and lonely ones. In her youth, Good Queen Alysanne had loved her subjects, lords and commons alike. She had loved her women’s courts, listening, learning, and doing what she could to make the realm a kinder place. She had seen more of the Seven Kingdoms than any queen before or since, slept in a hundred castles, charmed a hundred lords, made a hundred marriages. She had loved music, had loved to dance, had loved to read. And oh, how she had loved to fly. Silverwing had carried her to Oldtown, to the Wall, and to a thousand places in between, and Alysanne saw them all as few others ever would, looking down from above the clouds.
All these loves were lost to her in the last decade of her life. “My uncle Maegor was cruel,” Alysanne was heard to say, “but age is crueler.” Worn out from childbirth, travel, and grief, she grew thin and frail after Aemon’s death. Climbing hills became a trial to her, and in 95 AC she slipped and fell on the serpentine steps, breaking her hip. Thereafter she walked with a cane. Her hearing began to fail as well. Music was lost to her, and when she tried to sit in council meetings with the king she could no longer understand half of what was said. She was far too unsteady to fly. Silverwing last carried her into the sky in 93 AC. When she came to earth again and climbed painfully from her dragon’s back, the queen wept.
More than all of these, she had loved her children. No mother ever loved a child more, Grand Maester Benifer once told her, before the Shivers carried him away. In the last days of her life, Queen Alysanne reflected on his words. “He was wrong, I think,” she wrote, “for surely the Mother Above loved my children more. She took so many of them away from me.”
"No mother should ever have to burn her child,” the queen had said at the funeral pyre of her son Valerion, but of the thirteen children she bore to King Jaehaerys, only three of them would survive her, Aegon, Gaemon, and Valerion died as babes. The Shivers took Daenerys at the age of six. A crossbow slew Prince Aemon. Alyssa and Daella died in childbed, Viserra drunk in the street. Septa Maegelle, that gentle soul, died in 96 AC, her arms and legs turned to stone by greyscale, for she had spent her last years nursing those afflicted with that horrible condition.
Saddest of all was the loss of Princess Gael, the Winter Child, born in 80 AC when Queen Alysanne was forty-four and thought to be well past her childbearing years. A sweet-natured girl, but frail and somewhat simpleminded, she remained with the queen long after her other children had grown and gone, but in 99 AC she vanished from court, and soon afterward it was announced that she had died of a summer fever. Only after both her parents were gone did the true tale come out. Seduced and abandoned by a traveling singer, the princess had given birth to a stillborn son, then, overwhelmed by grief, walked into the waters of Blackwater Bay and drowned.
Some say that Alysanne never recovered from that loss, for her Winter Child alone had been a true companion during her declining years. Saera still lived, somewhere in Volantis (she had departed Lys some years before, an infamous woman but a wealthy one), but she was dead to Jaehaerys, and the letters Alysanne sent her secretly from time to time all went unanswered. Vaegon was an archmaester at the Citadel. A cold and distant son, he had grown to be a cold and distant man. He wrote, as a son ought. His words were dutiful, but there was no warmth to them, and it had been years since Alysanne had last seen his face.
Only Baelon the Brave remained near her till the end. Her Spring Prince visited her as often as he could and always won a smile from her, but Baelon was the Prince of Dragonstone, Hand of the King, forever coming and going, sitting at his father’s side at council, treating with the lords. “You will be a great king, even greater than your father,” Alysanne told him the last time they were together.
She did not know. How could she know?
After the death of Princess Gael, King’s Landing and the Red Keep became unbearable to Alysanne. She could no longer serve as she once had, as a partner to the king in his labors, and the court was full of strangers whose names Alysanne could not quite recall. Seeking peace, she returned once more to Dragonstone, where she had spent the happiest days of her life with Jaehaerys, between their first and second marriages. The Old King would join her there when he could. “How is it that I am the Old King now, but you are still the Good Queen?” he asked her once. Alysanne laughed. “I am old as well, but I am still younger than you.”
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
Alicent also abjected Rhaenyra and tried to style her as a treacherous slut for her own political benefit as Jaehaerys does, though it seems less a tragic thing since Alicent is the narrative villain and she has no biological relation with Rhaenyra. The loss there was what could have been as opposed to a reveal of what never was and an insistence on moving forward despite the self-cutting Jaehaerys performs. For all I said about Jaehaerys’ emotional distance, it was much easier for Alicen to dissociate because of that lack of a biological connection that she needs to recognize “family”.
Like Alysanne, Alicent and Jaehaerys live past their own children and some were lost violently. And she died in a misery and regret for how her relationships with her children turned out to be, or the fates of her kids.
Unlike Alicent and Jaehaerys, Alysanne never seemed to lose her "wits" or her mind even if she seemed to have regrets. She kept a certain edge of self-awareness of actions and refused to convince herself that things that happened were for the "better", as indicated by her never going back to live with Jaehaerys again in her last days. even with her allowing him to visit, it's Jaehaerys in doses, not the full thing. She obviously cared for him still and was still concerned with his happiness or well-being...but didn't seem to want to die near him either. Too many bad memories and sidelining, perhaps feeling guilt and helpless in equal spades.
Thematically, I think we can tie it back to her consistent directness and willingness to confront her needs, others, her actions, and those of her ancestors (the right of the first night and how it was abolished), and express them with less shame or guilt. She had a great hand in how her kids turned out by being more of an enabler and bystander unless it was way too late (her seeking to punish Saera for her sexual actions instead of her sadistic ones against Tom Turnip and sexual coercion of her ladies).
However, Jaehaerys definitely still lost Saera through his free will, decisions, and actions in all that I mentioned and so did Alicent, who fostered enmity between her kids and Rhaenyra enough that Aegon the Elder felt it his right to antagonize or dismiss Rhaenyra first 3 sons. Unlike in the show, he also antagonizes the V boys. In the book, Aegon II proves to never acknowledge Aegon the Younger or his mother as his kin, as he readily agrees with Alicent's suggestion to mutilate Aegon III to protect himself (and Aegon the Younger was legitimate, so we can't even argue that Aegon the Elder 's deal was only about legitimacy) and was very willing to kill her after she refused to acknowledge his ascension. Ironically, he also makes a child watch as someone does violently (arguably "worse, since that was their mother), just as Jaehaerys did to Saera. And none of his kids survived to produce anymore from his line.
Saera was one of Jaehaerys’ biggest public AND personal "shames". For him, not only did she bring dishonor (in the feudal coding) to her house by sleeping with three different boys before marriage and openly saying it without shame when questioned, she then became a sex worker ("whore") and then a brothel keeper, birthing many bastards in Essos. Saera is one type of prime “disobedient woman” (but unlike Rhaenyra, not very pragmatic). Jaehaerys reduced Saera through the labels of "slut" and "whore", seemingly no better than those women who were called Maegor's "trulls" who he had imprisoned or ousted from the Keep after taking it back following Maegor's death.
But because of that quick and cruel reduction, Saera was also one of Jaehaerys’ biggest regrets, in the way that he reacted towards her and isolated himself. Alysanne, Vaegon, Viserra, Baelon, Aemond, Alysa, etc. were all dead and gone and though these deaths were not his fault, their loss he felt and didn't express until then, with his mind going. It didn't seem like he fostered strong bonds with any of his grandchildren either. Saera was the only one who could have spent that time given to Alicent, but why would she go back when she and everyone knew Jaehaerys had declared her "dead" to him and having a life of her own in Essos? And while he and Alysanne seemed to make up twice, by the end she was more willing to live apart from him than with him. And going by Alysanne's love for her family and love for intimacy, I'd say she found no peace beside Jaehaerys.
On Alicent
Hearing all of these things a out how Saera “troubled” Jaehaerys -- but non of the honest ones -- I can see Alicent then developing the idea that Rhaenyra doesn’t deserve the throne because she may see her as Saera-reborn, a person destined to bring House Targaryen down and dishonor it more with her “loose” and “disrespectful” ways. That Alicent -- having heard the respected and constructivist King's suffering words, seeing how delirious he was in his final moments and hearing how he thought about Saera, how he often mistook her for her -- felt as if she really did become the Prodigal Daughter by taking her place. In both bringing comfort to Jaehaerys (as she thought) she became the desired dutiful daughter while also wishing to ideologically and practically distance herself from such a person as much as possible.
Especially (and this is if she even got to know this information in her then past 15 years of living as a comfortable noble-girl) considering that Braxton Beesbury was the one who Jaehaerys confronted. The Beesburys are sworn to the Hightowers.
I think the deal with Jaehaerys and Alicent came to believe that Jaehaerys’ will (misogynist as it was) was the only “true” will that mattered as it coincided with the traditional Andal one and prioritizes conformity. The Targs have always and continue to have that niggling conflict at the center of their dynasty, and Alicent inherited that denial of real female autonomy (not just her own power borrowed from patriarchal allowances) for cultural, Westerosi domination and over a more integrated model.
She, like Jaehaerys, tried the “easy” way out for herself by obeying or following the traditional social order’s precepts.
By continuing Jaehaerys’ destructive behavior and trying to limit the siccession to males, but now for her own more selfish benefit, Alicent engendered the destruction of her own personal line by not encouraging solidarity with Rhaenyra and antagonized her, just as Jaehaerys victimized Saera, denied Alysanne, emotionally distanced himself from his daughters and disempowered his granddaughter Rhaenys.
That his male-primogeniture-prioritization was the only peace-bringing mode of social structuring that actually brings peace AND justifies/assures her own making her son take the throne and warring against “trollop” Rhaenyra. Alicent's past intimacy with Jaehaerys -- hearing his thoughts and regrets towards Saera (as he showed himself thinking that she is her and thus wanting Saera near him, back in the Keep). While Alicent oversaw his acre and read to him, etc., I imagine him talking at length about he wished Saera were there, what he wished he said to her before she ran off, as well as diatribes against her, how she ruined herself and broke Alysanne's heart, how he broke Alysanne's heart because of Saera, etc.
Alicent ends up alone and also deeply regretting her actions, but she doesn’t totally blame herself either. Still thinking back to her “prime” self, being in front of Jaehaerys and having the King’s ear and last breath (quote of her last days above). It wasn't long before she died that she demanded her 8-year-old granddaughter, Jaehaera, to kill Aegon III, Jaehaera's then-husband. And she had been cursing Aegon's existence for a longer time while herself put into isolation.
Firstly, I agree that Jaehaerys ignored Saera, but Alysanne was actually the more engaged parent and the one who constantly observed several things about their children while Jaehaerys did jack. She was left with the childcare and nurturing domestics (when the children's maids and nannies weren't, she is still a noble/royal woman who is it expected to raise her kids as a common-born woman would).
I have a myriad of examples peppered throughout the analysis about Jaehaerys I, the Targs' dynastic history, and Alicent HERE, so I won’t mention them here. Enough that a pattern and truth emerges.
Secondly, Jaehaerys was never willing to marry Saera off to any of the three men she slept with. He only gave two options to Connington: the Night’s Watch or a ten-year exile, and the later chose exile only to die before it ended. He dueled with Beesbury and killed him. And he married Mooton to Perianne Moore. In no way was he ever willing to marry any of them to Saera, and actually outright refused to do so after she said that she was willing to marry any or all three (QUOTE). Alysanne never, ever said no to a marriage between her daughter and any of the three boys.
Thirdly, while Alysanne did say that Saera should be punished for the sleeping around, can we really exclude the pressure of Jaehaerys having punished Saera even worse if Alysanne had not been a mediating party? and as I already stated, Jaehaerys had all the ability to engage with all his kids and actually understand them -- that’s not on Alysanne. But Jaehaerys already assigned his daughters specific personalities before ever actually knowing the ones that came with them. Again, he had made sure that the family and their roles were shaped around his political needs more than finding that balance between love and security. He is the king. He determines the shape of the domestic realm in his own castle through those familial connections that he is responsible -- at the end of the day -- of arranging and controlling. Just to repeat myself.
Fourthly, Jaehaerys has always shown a force of will that even butted against Alysanne: Daenerys being named heir, Rhaenys (before GC of 101), Saera. Against his sister Rhaena and her relationships with all three Farmans and the deal with the lost dragon eggs. He was ready to fly to Essos or wherever those eggs ended up and threaten whoever had them with war and dragonfire if they refused to give them back, considering them stolen goods of the Targs.
We see that Alysanne struggled still with feeling in control and having power or being recognized enough through her interactions with the maesters at Oldtown:
[...] Queen Alysanne remained in Oldtown. The silent sisters hosted her in their motherhouse for a day of prayer and contemplation. Another day she spent with the septas who cared for the city’s sick and destitute. Amongst the novices she met was her niece Rhaella, whom Her Grace pronounced a learned and devout young woman “though much given to stammers and blushes.” For three days she lost herself in the Citadel’s great library, emerging only to attend lectures on the Valyrian dragon wars, leechcraft, and the gods of the Summer Isles.
Afterward she feasted the assembled archmaesters in their own dining hall, and even presumed to lecture them. “If I had not become queen, I might have liked to be a maester,” she told the Conclave. “I read, I write, I think, I am not afraid of ravens...or a bit of blood. There are other highborn girls who feel the same. Why not admit them to your Citadel? If they cannot keep up, send them home, the way you send home boys who are not clever enough. If you would give the girls a chance, you might be surprised by how many forge a chain.” The archmaesters, loath to gainsay the queen, smiled at her words and bobbed their heads and assured Her Grace that they would consider her proposal.
(Birth, Death, and Betrayal Under King Jaehaerys I)
“Presumed”. “Loath to gainsay”. “Consider”. “Why not admit them...?” the question never addressed. All to say this was a moment where Alysanne tried to assert herself and had no effect without Jaehaerys attached.
AND this:
And Alysanne was unwillingly separated from her TWICE and tried many times to get Jaehaerys to be gentler even before Saera fled.
Her Grace’s words were soft and gentle, and Jaehaerys was moved by them, Septon Barth tells us. Alysanne was stubborn and persistent and she had a way of bringing the king around to her own point of view, no matter how far apart they had been at the start. Given time, she might have softened his stance on Saera as well.
She would not have that time. That very night, Princess Saera sealed her fate. Instead of remaining in her rooms as she had been instructed, she slipped away whilst visiting the privy, donned a washerwoman’s robes, stole a horse from the stables, and escaped the castle. She got halfway across the city, to the Hill of Rhaenys, but as she tried to enter the Dragonpit, she was found and taken by the Dragonkeepers and returned to the Red Keep.
Alysanne wept when she heard, for she knew her cause was hopeless. Jaehaerys was hard as stone. “Saera with a dragon,” was all he had to say. “Would she have taken Balerion as well, I wonder?” This time the princess was not allowed to return to her own chambers. She was confined to a tower cell instead, with Jonquil Darke guarding her day and night, even in the privy.
(Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
So I ask...how does Alysanne truly have enough recognition to override Jaehaerys’s stubbornness and will as Visenya did to Aegon I enough to gainsay him against his intentions against Beesbury? Especially with how angry and humiliated Jaehaerys felt, how determined he was to eliminate the perceived threat to his authority and power?
Fifthly, it is after Saera escapes from her imprisonment the first time and tries to go to tthe Dragonpit AND Jaehaerys kills Beesbury that he, not Alysanne, sends his daughter into the Faith:
A fortnight later, Jaehaerys and Alysanne gave another of their daughters over to the Faith. Princess Saera, who was not quite seventeen, departed King’s Landing for Oldtown, where her sister Septa Maegelle was to take charge of her instruction. She would be a novice, it was announced, with the silent sisters.
Septon Barth, who knew the king’s mind better than most, would later maintain the sentence was meant to be a lesson. No one could mistake Saera for her sister Maegelle, least of all her father. She would never be a septa, much less a silent sister, but she required punishment, and it was thought that a few years of silent prayer, harsh discipline, and contemplation would be good for her, that it would set her on the path to redemption.
(Fire and Blood; Jaehaerys and Alysanne; Policy, Progeny, and Pain)
This emphasis on “king’s mind” lets us know that Jaehaerys was the one who made the decision or was the one pushing for and made the final choice to make Saera go to the septas.
And Barth makes it clear: to “re-educate” her to make her more amenable towards Jaehaerys’ desires.
Even if Alysanne was the one to suggest slow “redemption”, at that point she was doing all she could make keep Saera there, which involved placating Jaehaerys....you know, the actual KING.