just getting this out of my system

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Estonia

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
just getting this out of my system
maybe flowers can still grow from me
Pro tip: if you've always related to csa victims and kinda had this nagging feeling at the back of your mind that maybe you're not remembering something bad—there might be a reason for that! And boy, it can hit you like a truck at the least expected time
anon was blocked for…. obvious reasons. but let me explain how severely fucked-up of an ask this is to those who might not fully get it.
i got a reply recently about age play
"it doesn't matter if it's an adult acting like a child..."
As a victim of CSA, I completely disagree. It absolutely DOES matter! The difference between an adult acting as a child and you raping a child is consent, & anyone who wants to downplay the importance of consent to make their puritain talking points is genuinely not somebody I feel safe around as a victim. They care more about things being icky than actually caring about the harm (or lackthereof) being done.
People need to get normaler about CSA victims existing in fandom spaces, especially in situations where they’re projecting their CSA onto characters
Here are some sick tips
“Rapefic” and “a non-sexualized horror fic about CSA” or even “a non-explicit fic that just details how a character deals/copes with CSA” are not the same thing.
Yes, a character being coded as a (C)SA victim is a thing. This can either mean it’s written allegorically, or they have experiences very similar to victims. Hallmarks of this include themes of loss of autonomy, difficult relationships to touch/sex, losing a part of one’s body, not being able to remember one’s childhood, etc.
Not only is it okay to headcanon child characters as CSA victims, but you’re never gonna BELIEVE what the C in CSA stands for.
It’s also okay to headcanon characters from fiction mostly targeted at minors as CSA victims. “But what if a child sees it?” If it’s horror, or something else inappropriate for children, it should be filtered out with all other non-appropriate content. Otherwise, it’s fine. There is nothing inherent about themes of CSA that makes it automatically inappropriate. Again, you’re never gonna BELIEVE what the C in CSA stands for — why is representation for parental abuse victims understood as important for abused children, but not representation of child SA victims? Because our trauma is too gross? Very progressive of you.
If you’re about to say something about CSA portrayed in fandom spaces in the future, ask yourself, “If this was portraying psychological or physical abuse instead, would I have my panties in a twist right now?”
By making CSA victims out to be creeps for exploring or talking about our trauma (including through fandom), you are inherently contributing to the culture of shame and silence that silences SA victims.
Representation for CSA victims matters (including and especially those who are still children, because they are made to feel uniquely “ruined” — unlike their peers, who are still “innocent”)
All of this also applies to non-child SA victims and SA headcanons, too, by the way.
(This post is about how (C)SA victims have their real-life experiences treated like porn, and advocates for de-sexualizing the topic of (C)SA. This post is not about porn, erotica, or kink; please do not derail. Thank you.)