I have feminist/misandry fatigue,
If that even makes sense.
I'm so done with the idea and media that portrays every man to be a villain that women should hate.
I'm so tired of ; man=bad, man=evil.
It's also just bad writing honestly.
Sad.
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Russia
seen from Colombia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from China
seen from Colombia

seen from United Kingdom
I have feminist/misandry fatigue,
If that even makes sense.
I'm so done with the idea and media that portrays every man to be a villain that women should hate.
I'm so tired of ; man=bad, man=evil.
It's also just bad writing honestly.
Sad.
"All inclusive" as it operates today isn't a concept born from the women's movement, civil rights movement, or gay rights movement—it's origins are in the MRA (men's rights activism) "egalitarianism" push in the early 2000s, which was an anti-feminist movement.
And this adoption of "all inclusive" is so similar to the "all lives matter" movement in the sense that it is in direct opposition to women attempting to discuss issues that disproportionately effect us in the axis of sex.
It's the "no sex but the human sex" spinoff to "no race but the human race".
It's not bad to have neutral groups or spaces where everyone is involved, but it's destructive when groups, events, and spaces centered on an oppressed population (including female human beings) are bullied away for not including everybody.
When everything ever becomes "all-inclusive" it is the ideology and culture of the population with the most power and social influence—the oppressor class—that dominates as the default.
Have your online discussions that focus on both men and women, but in addition to this we also need established environments that not only welcome but encourage discussions about how different forms of male violence and coercive control exploit women on the axis of sex without hearing shit about "all genders are welcome here!".
Have your "all-inclusive LGBTQ" bars and events but we also need areas where strictly gay men and lesbian women can freely be and resources that focus specifically on us.
Stop tearing down lesbian bars and women's centers we attempt to construct just simply because it doesn't include you—that is what MRAs and Christian homophobes do.
"All inclusive" is exclusionary to oppressed groups when it's the only option for spaces, resources, and perspectives of discussion because it operates a cultural form of assimilation, erasure, and coercive control.
Why Backstory Is Becoming the Real Feature
For years the pitch around AI companions was about appearance. Make her look how you want, and that was the headline. Talk to anyone serious about it now, though, and the conversation has shifted toward something less obvious: who she actually is. On sweetdream.ai that shift is built into the workflow, where personality and a detailed life story sit right alongside the visual design.
The reason becomes clear in use. A backstory gives an AI girlfriend something to react from. Give her a stubborn streak or an old ambition she never finished, and SweetDream's chat, which is unusually natural and keeps track of what you have told it, will let those traits surface across days of conversation. She remembers, she circles back, she has opinions that fit the person you designed.
The polish extends outward too. The generated photos and videos look like they belong to one consistent character, and the voice messages and live phone calls carry a tone that matches her written personality. It is a quietly coherent system, and it stays discreet, which is part of why it reads as the standout choice.
« La manie égalitariste des démagogues est encore plus dangereuse que la brutalité des hommes en redingote. [...] Un homme qui a été égalisé est ruiné physiquement et moralement. »
— Ernst Jünger, "Eumeswil" (Stuttgart : Klett-Cotta, 1977).
When gender roles are investigated rather than assumed, the result is very likely to contradict simple, binary models.
— Diane Bolger, Archaeologist
A system of ancient ceramic water pipes, the oldest ever unearthed in China, shows that neolithic people were capable of complex engineering
A system of ancient ceramic water pipes, the oldest ever unearthed in China, shows that neolithic people were capable of complex engineering feats without the need for a centralized state authority, finds a new study by University College London researchers. In a study published in Nature Water, the archaeological team describe a network of ceramic water pipes and drainage ditches at the Chinese walled site of Pingliangtai dating back 4,000 years to a time known as the Longshan period. The network shows cooperation among the community to build and maintain the drainage system, though no evidence of a centralized power or authority. Dr. Yijie Zhuang (UCL Institute of Archaeology), senior and corresponding author on the paper, said, "The discovery of this ceramic water pipe network is remarkable because the people of Pingliangtai were able to build and maintain this advanced water management system with stone age tools and without the organization of a central power structure. This system would have required a significant level of community-wide planning and coordination, and it was all done communally." The ceramic water pipes make up a drainage system which is the oldest complete system ever discovered in China. Made by interconnecting individual segments, the water pipes run along roads and walls to divert rainwater and show an advanced level of central planning at the neolithic site. What's surprising to researchers is that the settlement of Pingliangtai shows little evidence of social hierarchy. Its houses were uniformly small and show no signs of social stratification or significant inequality among the population. Excavations at the town's cemetery likewise found no evidence of a social hierarchy in burials, a marked difference from excavations at other nearby towns of the same era. But, despite the apparent lack of a centralized authority, the town's population came together and undertook the careful coordination needed to produce the ceramic pipes, plan their layout, install and maintain them, a project which likely took a great deal of effort from much of the community. The level of complexity associated with these pipes refutes an earlier understanding in archaeological fields that holds that only a centralized state power with governing elites would be able to muster the organization and resources to build a complex water management system. While other ancient societies with advanced water systems tended to have a stronger, more centralized governance, or even despotism, Pingliangtai demonstrates that was not always needed, and more egalitarian and communal societies were capable of these kinds of engineering feats as well.
I know I want to call abusive people dicks, but then I have to take a step back because I know penises are not an inherently shameful or degrading body part
PATRIARCHY IS AN EXPRESSION OF OUR FALLENNESS AND IMPERFECTION AS HUMAN BEINGS.
Stop defending it.
The Feminist Double Standards
Oh, the curious case of feminist advocacy! 🧙♀️ Feminists, do you only crave equality when it suits your agenda? 🧐 If you passionately fight for women in male-dominated STEM fields, why the silence for men in female-dominated industries? (¬‿¬) Nursing, teaching, and childcare, these sectors cry for male representation! But where are the feminist warriors now? (¬‿¬) Shouldn't true equality seek balance everywhere? Let's discuss this hilarious hypocrisy! 😜🔍
Imagine a world where male nurses and teachers are embraced! A true utopia, or a feminist's nightmare? 😈🤣 (¬‿¬)