Proto-cinema Blog Post #2 Written language: Squares and Rectangles
Proto-Cinematic Production: Explorations from Still to Moving Images.
This week we’ve been talking about hieroglyphs, logo-graphic, pictographic, alphabetic, cuneiform, and the likes; written language. What I found interesting about the readings is all the guess work involved in researching these ancient written languages. Could cuneiform be written into wax as well as clay, sure, was there a rule? We’ve defined it now as a wedge shaped marks on a clay tablet but who is to say that it wasn’t done into wax as well? Writing is writing is cuneiform, writing is hieroglyph or drawing but drawing is never cuneiform. Squares and rectangles.
I’ve begun pleasure reading Mother Tongue, by Bill Bryson, which is more so about spoken language but it has this interesting fact: Icelandic written language has not changed much, people literate in Icelandic can quite easily read sagas written a thousand years ago. That is incredible when comparing Icelandic to English where modern spelling is really very new.
The assignment this week is to create a written language (hieroglyph, pictogram, etc.) and use that language to write a passage. I’ve been thinking a lot about what my invented written language might look like; what reasons would I have for making the characters a certain way. In my own work I’ve been doing some writing and distorting the script. I have also been looking at artists who have made work using symbols and symbol like drawings such as Paul Klee and Charles E Burchfield. Klee used hieroglyphs and symbols and his works often looked like a system of writing but were rarely specific where as Burchfield invented musical symbols to make his paintings more genuine to the environment. Burchfield spent most of his career in Bufflao, NY where I grew up and his work has always resonated with me, he gives such a strong sense of place, a place I know so well. In 1961 Burchfield wrote: “An artist must paint, not what is there. To do so he must invent symbols which, if properly used, make his work seem even more real than what is in front of him. He does not try to by-pass Nature; his work is superior to Nature; surface appearances, but not to it’s basic laws.” For instance, in “Cicada’s Song” Burchfield included in the painting a tree which morphed into a zig-zag –an explosion of the cicada’s sound.
I’m interested in these constructions and organically formed symbols and also I have been thinking of Chinese Calligraphy and our visiting artist last semester Lampo Leong who demonstrated for us. I did an ink drawing over break, whilst drawing it I thought of traditional brush calligraphy even though I was not drawing a character but a bird, I approached drawing it as a Calligrapher might, thinking of the form of the bird I wanted to draw and executing it free hand in a bold manner. I could create a pictographic language based on the forms of birds in flight.
https://www.burchfieldpenney.org/exhibitions/exhibition:03-13-2015-06-28-2015-charles-e-burchfield-audio-graphics/
Keimer, Ludwig. “A Note on the Hieroglyphs [unknown] and [unknown]”. The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures 43.3 (1927): 226–231. Web…
Waal, Willemijn. “They Wrote on Wood. The Case for a Hieroglyphic Scribal Tradition on Wooden Writing Boards in Hittite Anatolia”. Anatolian Studies 61 (2011): 21–34. Web…
Also, on the sound tangent, this site is really cool:
http://savethesounds.info