I wanted Dubai chocolate matcha latte! It gave me lemon-lime!
seen from Oman
seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Syria
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from China
I wanted Dubai chocolate matcha latte! It gave me lemon-lime!
Felt like sharing this classic of video games journalism:
Credit for discovery: @misscloudiedays
So a lot of people are confused as to how Epic Mickey Rebrushed meaning Disney probably isn't getting profits works, so let me explain real quick:
What's the Sitch?
If you go to the Steam Page, Disney is not publishing EM Rebrushed themselves like they did with the original EM games, another company ,THQ Nordic, whom Disney does not own is.
This likely means they sold the licensing rights to that company rather than accepting profit cuts.
How this works
Copyright holders often do this if they think the product would make less profits than what they sold the licensing rights for. For example, this happened with the author of the Witcher books, who thought the games would flop and sold the licensing rights instead of accepting a percentage of the profits. He later acted like the victim when the games actually ended up being wildly successful. This also happened to the writer of the American Pokemon Theme Song, who didn't know the Pokemon franchise was going to go on for decades and remain popular, though he was more chill about it and worked something out.
Basically, Disney likely had so little faith in the game, they chose to sell instead of accept profits, which would mean whether you buy or pirate the game wouldn't affect them, since they would have already gotten the agreed upon amount, and they'd probably piss themselves if the profits Purple Lamp gets is more than what they sold it for.
Would they actually do that?
For anyone who questions if Disney would really be dumb enough to do this, REMEMBER THIS IS THE COMPANY WHO:
SHUT DOWN AND ENTIRE VIDEO GAME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY JUST BECAUSE EPIC MICKEY 2 DIDN'T MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS EPIC MICKEY 1
THOUGHT PEOPLE WOULD ABANDON CONSOLE GAMING IN FAVOR OF MOBILE GAMING
THOUGHT KINGDOM HEARTS COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE SEQUELS
HAD A CEO WHO THOUGHT ADULTS DON'T ENJOY CARTOONS
AND THE MOST RECENT BLUNDER OF ALL, THOUGHT DISNEY FANS WOULD PREFER A LUMA KNOCKOFF OVER STARBOY IN WISH, BECAUSE THEY WANTED A MARKETABLE PLUSHIE
Yeah, I think they're that dumb.
Bottom Line
For those participating in the Disney boycott, it is probably safe to get the game, and will not be a breach of your boycott. Buying the game would instead show support to those who actually care about the game while not benefitting the company that abandoned it.
That being said, this is not guaranteed to be completely correct. Keep an eye on things as it develops, and make your own decisions on the matter.
The Distraction - Deus Ex: Human Revolution [Steam]
" Life well lived! "
PC Gamer Magazine n298 - November, 2017.
Anyone getting into Epic Mickey should check this video out.
This was made by Game Informer as a companion piece to the iconic November 2009 issue announcing the original Epic Mickey.
Epic Mickey by Warren Spector
This was done in conjunction with the game and the first set were promotional and only on the iPad. All of these were writing by Peter David. They are lots of fun. You can preorder on Amazon
Report on ION Storm talking about Daikatana II in development by Human Head. Also Warren Spector talking about Shooter (aka Deus Ex). (PC Gamer #48, May 1998)