Shame arrives, then, in the rush of self-consciousness in which the spontaneity of curiosity or joy is interrupted and rendered problematic, marked by a sense of danger or risk, but thereby also made sharply visible to the self and thus, it would seem, effectively augmented in the process. In shame, desire, whatever its object (and in Tomkinsʼ theory at least, there is no privileging of the sexual, much less the heterosexual, object) is not so much decisively blocked as tantalizingly arrested, caught like a deer in the headlights of (self-) scrutiny. The moment is open: what happens next perhaps makes all the difference.
VIRGINIA BURRUS, saving shame: martyrs, saints, and other abject subjects