NASA
will byers stan first human second
occasionally subtle
taylor price
almost home
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Sade Olutola
ojovivo

PR's Tumblrdome
Xuebing Du

roma★

oozey mess
No title available

Discoholic 🪩
Keni

if i look back, i am lost

Love Begins
Show & Tell

seen from Singapore

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Estonia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
@gildedpirateship
Ive had to be real patient. It all didnt happen right away. Even in the midst of the whole gallery art world I thought this was the greatest thing in the wor...
One of the surest of tests is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different from that from which it was torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.
T.S. Eliot, “The Sacred Wood.” This is one of the quotes that opens Steal Like An Artist, and I go back to it occassionally to remember that Eliot had it all laid out almost 100 years ago. It’s actually quite different than the “good artists copy, great artists steal” quote that is usually (mis)attributed to Picasso. What Eliot is talking about is transformation — not just taking things out of context, but re-contextualizing them. (Godard put it, “It’s not where you take things from — it’s where you take them to.”) Actually, as Eliot points out, it does matter where you take things from — a good poet borrows from poems “remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.” So: steal from the past, steal from another language or culture, or steal from someone who’s writing about another subject. (via austinkleon)
#artbaselmiami #WolfGangTillmans #boss
Photo: David Edwards
Boom-Art's 18th Century Baroque Surf and Skate Boards
Hypebeast
The Top 10 Hidden Restaurants in NYC: 2015 Edition http://ift.tt/1OyIv3F
FUTURA Mural In Progress
FUTURA Mural Underway On Houston/Bowery Wall in New York // Highsnobiety
Converse CONS Ambassador Pack Sage Elsesser CTAS
Via Black Sheep
Making excellent use of Snappa, a simple graphic design tool for creating quick social graphics. Snappa.io.
Supreme Release at Dashwood Books
Looking forward to the launch event for David Sims' Supreme this Wednesday at Dashwood Books.
'Supreme' Photography Book by David Sims: A visual history of Supreme’s NYC skate heritage // Hypebeast
The Story of Emoji
As the world braces for a bunch of new iPhone emojis this November, complete with taco (finally!) and an anatomically incorrect middle finger, let us travel way back in time to the ‘90s when emoji as we know it was born via a bad business decision. Cut to The Verge:
In 1995, sales of pagers were booming among Japan’s teenagers, and NTT Docomo’s decision to add the heart symbol to its Pocket Bell devices let high school kids across the country inject a new level of sentiment (and cuteness) into the millions of messages they were keying into telephones every day. Docomo was thriving, with a bona fide must-have gadget on its hands and market share in the neighborhood of 40 percent. But when new versions of the Pocket Bell abandoned the heart symbol in favor of more business-friendly features like kanji and Latin alphabet support, the teenagers that made up Docomo’s core customer base had no problem leaving for upstart competitor Tokyo Telemessage. By the time Docomo realized it had misjudged the demand for business-focused pagers, it was badly in need of a new killer app. What it came up with was emoji.
Shigetaka Kurita, an employee at NTT Docomo, invented emoji as a way to infuse human emotion into an otherwise stark and sometimes misinterpreted realm of mobile communication. Drawing inspiration from Japanese comics, Kurita and his team drafted 176 emoji characters, attempting to capture the complete range of human emotion.
My favorite part of this story is that Kurita was not a designer by trade but an economics major, dispelling the myth that left-brain thinkers can’t be creative.
And in closing, I leave you with a random link to Emojinalysis where you can get a psychological profile based on your frequently used emojis. Since mine are knives, pills, martinis, and bathtubs, I'll probably skip this part.
How emoji conquered the world // The Verge Image via Cosmo, What Your Favorite Emoji Says About You