Algorithm and Transparency
The Internet has long been considered an oasis of information once it became readily available to the public. A metaphysical construct where thoughts could be planted in the open with the potential for the impossible to spring forth. Or so, thought in optimism that everyone thought would usher in a era of peace. The unbridled freedom that came with a virtual space essentially has become an invisible cage where its participants willingly lock themselves in, according to Taina Bucher. She notes that every member of a community, especially in social media ends up being policed by one another in the name of “keeping up with the joneses.” Particularly today where validation is found not just in physical relationships, but even more so virtual likes and a daily ranking system of awareness between users, is a rationale to exchange personal information with a great potential for deep-seated repercussions in the future (beyond hacking). This debate on internet ethics is a continual dilemma posed by Ellen Mole as the fight between custody of our private thoughts and predictive assistance due to oversharing. Given today’s political climate, it is interesting that transparency is the champion of equity as it forces the authority towards a submissive stance; In the opposite, we see a lot of anonymous figures behind the scenes of history making sure to use whatever means to facilitate results that could not be normally done. Even though the main facets of analysis for today’s blog post are Anonymity and Transparency, it seems that the true problem is validation (or the lack thereof) of certain people or events. This desire to be made visible (on any label) plays into the power dynamics posed by Foucault’s Panopticism, which delves into surveillance to give and take power. While the social exchange required no physical transaction; being able to do certain things as one under authority versus above/equal authority manifests the upkeep in several different ways. Perhaps therefore the concept of image is important; if one person has only one “identity,” then there is much scrutiny to be had, because every decision and mistake is entirely visible. For artists, having an alter-ego or stage persona might alleviate some of that burden of having to be accountable during their career; to be doing the same job for more than 2-4 years, regardless of vocation, is taxing. On the other hand, having too many identities ironically causes a decrease in visibility because of burnout. These algorithmic patterns become too spread out and statistically insignificant to study.














