Albert's Magical Library #3:
The Rebirth of Witchcraft by Doreen Valiente
Essential reading. Absolutely fabulous. Valiente tells the story of the Pagan revival in the 50s onwards.
Valiente was part of Gardener's original coven, then worked with Cochrane - I think in her lifetime she initiated into four different traditions, so she is the girl with the dirt on what went down. Additionally, she's a great writer - she knows how to tell a good yarn, and successfully balances autobiographical details with telling an impartial history. She exposes lies confidently - and as one might imagine, the sorts of men who make up their own religion tell them in spades. She has a section on Alex Sanders, “King of the Witches”, and various other high-profile figures; the penultimate chapter is on Feminist Witchcraft, and the movements of the 70s and 80s. She puts a lot of stuff one is vaguely aware of into context - for example, she ruthlessly identifies all of Gardener's original sources for Wicca, talking about Aradia, Murray, Crowley, Freemasonry and so on. You probably know bits of this, but it's a pleasure for Grand Ma'am Doreen to take you through it in detail. She also has allll the T on the schisms, the infighting, the big personalities: very juicy. Valiente was surrounded for her entire magical career by a succession of famous men who revered the Sacred Feminine, but didn't seem to like real women all that much, but she talks about it with a clarity and grace and, as far as I can tell, gives an honest appraisal of these figures' good and bad qualities. Of course, Valiente is also teaching us about herself. Valiente is really underrated as a figure in early witchcraft - but she was Gardener's High Priestess, she helped write a lot of the most beautiful chants and spells from that time, she was a leader and creator as much as a participant and biographer. She was involved until the end of her life in Pagan activism. I think Wicca gets a bad rap on this site; a lot of people are unecessarily and pre-emptively hostile towards it, presumably because they were all Wiccan teenagers and are very embarassed about it. I think the rather muted way Wicca has been written about in the 90s and onwards does a real disservice to Wicca-as-practiced, and this book gives you a window into how complex and vivid the craft was as imagined by its early practicioners. It's vibrant and earthy, and so alive. I learnt my Wicca from geocities websites and Scott Cunningham, and no one ever conveyed that it could feel like this. Valiente's craft has a lot in common with things “friendly not all witches are Wiccan” witches are doing today: looking at primary sources, folklore, traditional practices and so on. She gives tantalising details of practices, tools and original sources - all of which will empower whatever craft you're doing, and give you ideas. She has whole chapters on traditional witchcraft, snatches of poetry, details from her own clairvoyant practices, descriptions of rituals she participated in. This is not a “how to be a witch” book, but you WILL want to use some of it all the same. (I re-read it for the review, and noticed three or four things I thought I'd invented for Fencraft which are, in fact, Valiente's ideas. It made me feel really empowered, like I too could be an Important Witch With Big Ideas instead of humbly doing what I was told) She also has a lot of wisdom scattered throughout the book on the challenges of working in community: themes such as secrecy vs openness, authoritarian coven leaders, witches who crave fame and attention, sexism, sex, abuses of power,come up over and over again. Her voice is well worth heeding. Great book. Really re-readable too; I just took it down to refresh my memory, and accidently re-read the whole thing. Both to spend time with the author, and to make more notes. Get a copy if you can. (note: in the chapter on Feminist Witchcraft, she dedicates a page to the life and ideas of Z Budapest who, I believe, has been involved in spats about transmisogyny more recently. Valiente makes no comment on this, although she does write a strong defence of LGB people's place in Paganism, and about how her views have changed over time. I feel like this is probably a needed warning so no one is surprised by it; but please don't make this a reason to skip this book. This is absolutely essential reading for 201 level Pagans who want to know more about the context and history of what they are doing, I can't recommend it highly enough.)















