in regards to the CA civil war post you reblogged-- i havent seen the movie since it's come out and felt like shit for agreeing with Tony afterwards because everyone was all like CAP IS RIGHT!! -- but anyway, did anyone actually say "necessary imperialism" in the movie wtf even happened in that movie i dont even remember??
To be honest I haven’t rewatched the movie either, but I felt ‘necessary imperialism’ was about how the guy is called ‘Captain America’ and sort of represents the US and US politics? So what he does - and specifically what he does in that movie - how he stomps around the world, complains about UN regulations, only cares about saving or helping his friends, disregards the rubble and misery left in his wake - yeah, at the time that seemed quite a clear, if perhaps unintentional, metaphor of how Washington behaves. And I don’t want to start shit here - I don’t know the first thing about the Avengers, never read the comics, have no idea how much of this is the screenwriters or whatever - I’m simply speaking as a person who sort of enjoyed the movies, and literally my only point is that Steve Rogers has evolved in a direction I don’t like at all. Because, I don’t know, in the beginning this was a guy who sacrificed everything, including his best friend and a potential wife, to take the Nazis down; and yet, as the movies progress, his actions turn more and more selfish in a ‘friends first’ instead of ‘values first’ sense. This culminates in his idiotic decision to put all of Wakanda at risk and basically sacrifice not his own life, but the lives of hundreds of African men and women to try and save one of his buddies - Vision - who’d begged Steve and the others to just kill him before it was too late. Like, maybe I’m old-fashioned, but I believe there are some things it’s worth sacrificing what you want for - your ambitions, your life, and, yeah - the safety and happiness of your loved ones - and the exact definition of a hero is ‘someone who’s strong enough to make that incredibly hard choice no ordinary person would make’.
And the thing is - I’m not even annoyed by that - I’m annoyed by how it was framed as a noble, necessary and thoroughly unproblematic decision? Jesus, I was 100% there for ‘super-soldier tired of war compromises decades-old moral compass to save his friends because that’s what we’d all do’ - I would have loved to see that -
(As a nerdy addition, that’s a time-honoured and heartbreaking trope - the choice, for instance, that Aeneas faces in Troy. Like, there’s this scene in the Aeneid when Troy is finished, okay, it’s done and dying and there’s chaos and blood and howling soldiers everywhere, and Aeneas randomly runs into a courtyard and sees the Greeks about the butcher Priam, his king, the person he was sworn to serve and protect - and Aeneas knows he should step in, risk his life to save Priam’s, but instead - instead, seeing this old man about to be killed is a sharp reminder of his own father, alone and defenceless, and that’s why Aeneas turns back, saves him instead.)
- but nope, the whole thing was told as ‘hey it’s super cool to doom everyone as long as your bae is okay’ which seems to have become the standard narrative of many so-called ‘heroes’ of screens big and small?
And if you start to look at the political implications of that kind of behaviour, then I’m sorry, but it’s exactly what Trump’s been saying for two years: that nothing matters, not human rights, not international peace, not hundreds of thousand of people dying, as long as American jobs and (rich, white) American lives are safe. Hell, he put it very clearly (and openly) after journalist Jamal Khashoggi was slaughtered in Istanbul:“I’d rather keep the million jobs.”
[Fact check: on top of everything else, it’s not ‘million’. Also, he’s not fooling anyone: like countless other politicians, what matters to him is not what Saudi Arabia can do for US jobs, but how much money he can get out of them to line his own pockets.]