The other day I received a notification in my PC about some program called Armoury Crate. I hadn't installed it.
I checked today to see what it is, and it's some bloatware shit that ASUS installed on its own. In theory, it helps control RGB and some other things (that are mainly useful I think for videogames, since it also installed some videogame thing called ROG, I'm not into videogames).
Anyways, I read a review saying that it's best to not even install it because if you uninstall it, it leaves traces all over the PC (it installs many other things along itself). Apparently, it stays in the BIOS as well so it can reinstall on its own at a later moment.
This pissed me off. But then also, the article itself was interestingly written. It starts like a normal review, it mentions something that makes you suspicious of the program and then it does the Advantages/Disadvantages thing, including giving you the option to download and install it to see for yourself. And it's only in the "Bad things about it" part of the article that it really lets go and tells you it's bloatware, it's not good, it's better to not install it, etc.
So why did it offer the possibility of installing it in the first place? Why was it tamish first and then went hard about it? I suspect that the author may be afraid of being too straight-forward but why?
Anyways, keep an eye out for this Armoury Crate thing if you own an ASUS. It seems to be more important for laptops because it does things the computer itself can't do, but on a PC, it doesn't need it at all.