I blocked the person a while ago but one person said that you can't be an anti and a Jojo fan because of Arakis non story related art, one I believe of Lucy topless, when like fashion is all about pushing boundaries and women being topless is often seen as sexual so it'd be pushing boundaries to have a young girl be non sexually topless. And with the romantic pose art of Trish and Mista, how do we know she's still 15. And Mista is only 18 (kinda iffy) so they maybe got together when they're both a bit older
I wouldn't have half the problem I have with proshippers if they didn't think all things that push boundaries are like them literally making CSAM (which reminder written CSAM also goes against guidelines here)
first of lol good that you blocked them cause they’re basically saying Araki is a pro-shipper??? Weird asf
But yeah for me when it comes to the “problematic” art that he’s drawn, my whole thing is- it’s art. With the pose with Mista and Trish I agree with you on that one because maybe it had been after the fact of part 5?? It definitely still would’ve been WEIRD but who knows.
And when it comes to Lucy, the only time we actually see her actually not covered was when she was getting harassed by Funny Valentine, I find that one picture of Lucy where she’s covering herself just to be another one of his vogue poses, or artistic nudity? (maybe not? I’m not educated because it IS a 14-15 year old.)
I don’t find his work too sexualizing, it’s simply just nudity? (Not even fully nude, since she was covering herself) MINUS the part with Funny Valentine, which was SA.
And with your last statement I agree, like genuinely keep that shit to yourself?? Especially whenever the topic of proshippers come up, I’m always reminded of that one person that sexualized the shit out of Narancia, making weird ass art.
