When you act like the worst experiences are universal or even merely typical, you hurt people. You trivialize what happened to the people whose experiences were among the worst. As if there was nothing unusual and they don’t need any special care to deal with it, from self or others. You cut the confidence of others, making them think that they will, or will likely, go through the same thing and they won’t be able to cope. This increases the chance that they actually won’t be able to cope if something bad happens, even if it’s at a level they otherwise could have, because they no longer believe they can. You make people believe that reducing their chances of bad outcomes is futile, and they don’t try. You create an environment of hostility and backlash against the ones who look for damage-reduction strategies nonetheless and claim that there are, in fact, ways to protect yourself and they’re useful even if they’re not guaranteed to work.
This is bad. Don’t do this. Do your best to be accurate and honest, even if you score fewer cheap points in whatever short-term game you’re playing. Accuracy to your best ability doesn’t mean a coverup - it means telling the truth. It also means a good-faith effort to learn the truth and spot where people are mistakenly or dishonestly giving wrong information, in either direction. People need to know the real chances of whatever you’re talking about, their personal risk factors that could make their own chances higher or lower, and how to add protective factors. This helps efforts at a solution focus their resources on the right things to find solutions that actually work. It helps people who are very concerned about the bad thing take partial control and feel the amount of fear proportionate to their situation, not greater than proportionate. Too much fear is counterproductive, proportionate fear guides actions to minimize risk without excessively limiting other life activities.