Company advised by Trump sons initially claimed hope for federal funds, then retracted statement #BBBDeficit #trumpfamily
A public document filed by a company that just hired President Donald Trump’s two oldest sons as advisers included a sentence early Monday t
Early Monday, a public document filed by a company that recently engaged President Donald Trump’s two eldest sons as advisers contained a sentence indicating its aspiration to profit from grants and other incentives offered by the federal government—a government led by their father. However, when The Associated Press inquired with the Trump family business about this apparent conflict of interest, the document was promptly revised, and the controversial line was removed. According to the filing, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are set to receive “founder shares” valued at millions of dollars in New America Acquisition 1 Corp. This company, currently without any operational business, aims to fill that void by acquiring an American company capable of playing “a significant role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing,” a goal that aligns with the president’s trade policy aimed at bolstering U.S. manufacturing. The original securities filing stated that the target company should be “well positioned” to leverage federal or state government incentives. This reference was notably absent from the revised version. The Trump Organization did not respond to questions regarding whether New America still intended to benefit from government programs or the rationale behind removing the line. However, Paul Hastings, the external law firm that assisted in preparing the document, sent an email to AP stating that the inclusion was a “mistake” made by “scriveners,” an archaic term for legal paper transcribers. Kathleen Clark, an expert in government ethics, remarked that any excuses offered were too late, as the Trumps had already revealed their intentions. “They simply deleted the language. They haven’t pledged not to pursue what they earlier stated they were planning to do,” said the Washington University law professor and Trump critic. “It’s an attempt to exploit public office for private gain.” New America is a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC—a publicly traded entity established solely to utilize its funds to acquire another company and take the target public. New America plans to raise capital by selling new stock on the New York Stock Exchange at 10 per share.This move could potentially best ow the two Trump sons with acombined paper wealth of 50 million on the first day of trading. The company aims to sell enough shares to raise $300 million, which it then intends to use to purchase a yet-to-be-identified manufacturer. A press release issued by New America emphasized its focus on “American values and priorities,” making no mention of its aim to secure government incentives. The filing to New America’s potential new investors, submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission, was explicit about its criteria for a target company. It stated, among other things, its desire for a company that can capitalize on “public policy tailwinds” by benefiting from federal or state “grants, tax credits, government contracts, or preferential procurement programs.”














