Bordeaux 2011 - A Horse with No Name - Post #2
Billy and I were extremely excited to embark on Day 2 of our 2011 En Primeur tastings. We set out very early the morning of April 6th to visit a few négociant partners and to taste nearly 100 wines from the 2011 Bordeaux vintage. This year I made a conscious effort to not read too much about the vintage prior to the trip to avoid any preconceived notions. The power of suggestion for me is always problematic when tasting wines, so I was excited to embark on the day’s tastings with an open mind and a well-rested palate.
Because I have a business to run and a limited amount of time to devote to writing about weather patterns in Bordeaux, I would like to share with you some of my favorite sources for reliable information regarding the vintages. Bill Blatch’s annual vintage report is probably the most detailed and interesting reports you will ever find regarding the weather of any particular Bordeaux vintage. As far as I can tell, he has not yet released his 2011 report. He’s launched a website, http://bordeauxgold.com/, and I strongly encourage you to sign up for his newsletter. Bill was formerly a négociant and is now particularly focused on the sweet wines of Sauternes and Barsac. His 2011 vintage report should be of extreme interest because, by all accounts, 2011 is a tremendously successful sweet wine vintage. I, of course, also encourage you to read Robert Parker’s vintage report and tasting notes. There is little question that he continues to be the most important market mover in the business, and once his scores and comments come out for 2011, the En Primeur campaign will start in earnest if it hasn’t already. You can access all things Parker at http://www.erobertparker.com/. I also encourage you to frequent Jeff Leve’s site, http://www.thewinecellarinsider.com/. Jeff is a long-time collector and an extremely passionate and knowledgeable guy who is a lot of fun to read and drink with for that matter! His site is full of images, interviews and very detailed overviews of each appellation. He publishes complete tasting notes and is covering Bordeaux as well as anyone at this point. Check out those sites to really dig into the weather, but, in general, here is my take on the growing conditions for 2011:
Bordeaux experienced summer in the spring and spring in the summer during the year. The temperatures were unusually warm in the spring, causing bud break to happen earlier than normal. I remember being there last year for the En Primeur tastings of the 2010 vintage in April, 2011. The weather was beautiful, warm and the buds were breaking on the vines. This sped up the maturation cycle of the plant, encouraged leaf and fruit growth but all under very dry conditions. The vines suffered from hydric stress, and then were hammered with some extremely hot days at the end of June. Then came cooler weather, rain, and, because of the uneven leaf growth in the spring, the grapes grew in an uneven fashion. The severe heat that shocked the vine’s sap (the blood of a vine) in late spring brought the vine’s maturation to a halt in some instances and made it difficult to achieve the appropriate level of phenolic ripeness. Some appellations were hit by hail and many had to perform green harvests to concentrate the vines’ vigor towards the best remaining fruit. Luckily, the harvest occurred under ideal temperatures and again very dry conditions. Those who were able to maneuver through the odd spring and summer ended up making well-balanced wines from tiny, concentrated grapes that feature bright acidity, good sweet fruit, and firm but not harsh tannins. Good examples should show well young and for the near to medium term. The best examples will require a moderate level of patience (3 to 5 years in the cellar) and then should provide decades of enjoyment. It’s actually a very interesting vintage aside from some disappointing wines. I think the key is to focus on the appellations that did well, and then ever further by looking for the Châteaux with the financial ability and wherewithal to do the work necessary to produce a proper wine in this challenging vintage. The below are the impressions that we gathered from our tastings on the afternoon of April 6th:
Based on this relatively comprehensive tasting we did that afternoon, here is my general take on how the appellations performed:
2011 Bordeaux & Côtes, Médoc & Haut Médoc & Others
Most of these vineyards are located in and around Margaux and others are scattered throughout the Right bank. As is always the case, these appellations delivered an awful lot of forgettable wines, but I was happy with a few and am always shocked at how good some of these wines are for their money. My favorite wines in the $15 to $25 dollar category were Sénéjac, Camensac, Potensac, Citran and Poujeaux. Sénéjac is actually insanely good for the money if it stays cheap. Parker gave ‘09 93 points so look out below!!! I also enjoyed Clos les Lunelles again this year, and, at the higher price point, Cantemerle and La Tour Carnet were nice. There were others that suffered from under-ripeness and over-extraction: Croix-Mouton, d’Aiguilhe, Caronne St. Gemme (downright green), Lannessan, Clement-Pichon, Chasse Spleen, and Maucaillou. Overall this was a fairly mixed bag, but there are a few that should be solid bets for the money. I sort of think of these appellations like slot machines. You don’t have to spend a lot to play, and many times you are disappointed and lose your quarter; other times you make out shockingly well. It never hurts to give it a shot. Tasted: Croix-Mouton, Cap de Faugeres, d'Aiguilhe, Les Lunelles, Caronne Ste. Gemme, Sénéjac, Citran, Clement-Pichon, Maucaillou, Camensasc, Poujeaux, Chasse-Spleen, Cantemerle, La Tour Carnet, Potensac, Chapelle de Potensac, Lanessan, Peyrabon.
2011 Pomerol
I wish that we had tasted more from Pomerol. I’ve heard that Vieux Château Certan is a candidate for wine of the vintage, and if it is any follow up to ‘09 and ‘10, I don’t doubt it. From what I could tell, the best wines were balanced on fresh acidity and pure fruit. They were fine and not at all harsh. I think they will drink well early and often. On the other side of the coin, there were a few that seemed a bit unsure of themselves: thin, acidic and fairly forgettable. I definitely enjoyed La Conseillante the most out of this group. I love Gilles Pauquet’s finesse driven approach to winemaking, and, in this vintage, the silky soft tannins of Merlot from Pomerol shine through. Honestly, I love Burgundy for its ethereal texture and weightlessness, so La Conseillante is right up my alley. Petit-Village was good, and I also enjoyed Le Gay, whom I think are a Château to watch. They’ve been on a roll in recent vintages. Nénin and Fugue de Nénin were among the thin camp and were out of whack acidity-wise. Overall, I think Pomerol did well and the Merlots were fairly healthy, but I didn’t taste very much of it and didn’t have any Châteaux appointments on the Right bank. All that we tasted from these Appellations were done at the négociant tastings. Tasted: Petit-Village, Le Gay, La Conseillante, Fugue de Nénin, Nénin.
2011 St. Emilion
The wines from St. Emilion were really difficult, and I fear that way too many tried to overdo it with the extraction (trying to get the same color and power of ‘09 and ‘10). This coupled with high acidity resulted in many wines with a hollowed-out mid-palate, unripe tannins and short, bitter finishes. The most notable wines that fall into this disappointing category were Pavie-Macquin, La Gaffelière, Figeac, Pavie-Decesse, Bellevue Mondotte, Monbousquet and Pavie. The best wine I tasted here was Angélus, which I thought laid off of the extraction just enough to produce a balanced and quite powerful effort. I also enjoyed some drinkers: Pressac, Fleur Cardinale, and L’Arrosée, so, if you are on a budget, don’t be shy with these Châteaux. Tasted: Pressac, Quinault L'Enclos, Faugères, Rol Valentin, La Confession, Lucia, Destieux, Monbousquet, La Gomerie, Bellevue Mondotte, Fleur Cardinale, L'Arrosée, Bellefont-Belcier, Larcis-Ducasse, La Gaffelière, Clos Fourtet, Pavie-Macquin, Troplong-Mondot, Pavie-Decesse, Figeac, Beau-Séjour Bécot, Duffau, Angélus, Pavie.
2011 Margaux I found Margaux to be challenging as well, with a very inconsistent effort across the appellation. There were many wines with harsh, dry tannins, and I fear that many Châteaux also pushed the extraction too much without ripe enough fruit/tannins to do so. For that reason, I wasn’t crazy about Prieuré-Lichine nor Giscours. Lascombes is just too overblown and a mess in my opinion in 2011. I admit that I didn’t taste too much Margaux, but, in order of my enjoyment, I liked the following: Cantenac Brown, d’Issan, Malescot St. Exupéry, and even the inexpensive Monbrison. Stay away from Marquis d’Alesme Becker, as it had some finger nail polish thing going on and very harsh tannins. Ferrières was…yikes! Durfort-Vivens was rather rustic and du Tertre wasn’t too bad but was nothing to write home about. Tasted: Desmirail, Monbrison, Marquis d'Alesme, Ferrière, du Tertre, Durfort Vivens, Cantenac-Brown, Prieuré-Lichine, Giscours, d'Issan, Malescot St. Exupéry, Lascombes.
2011 Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Similar to Margaux, I found this appellation’s quality to be up and down in 2011. In general, there were hard, tannic wines with hollow middles, and very few that managed to achieve enough ripeness to balance out the high acidities and dry tannins. Pape Clement and Smith-Haut-Lafitte were too extracted and dry. Latour-Martillac and Malartic-Lagravière featured harsh, dry tannins with not enough fruit content. I didn’t mind Haut-Bailly, and, although it was a bit modern and in your face, I thought de Fieuzal was fairly successful. I enjoyed Domaine de Chevalier the most. It had a weird nose, but good balance and freshness. Bargain shoppers should go for Chantegrive: a little thin in the middle, but pretty easy drinking wine. Graves/Pessac was probably my least favorite in 2011 on the Left Bank.
Tasted: Chantegrive, Martillac, Larrivet Haut-Brion, Carbonnieux, Fieuzal, Malartic-Lagravière, Domaine de Chevalier, Smith Haut Lafitte, Haut-Bailly, Pape Clément. 2011 St. Estèphe
I tasted very few wines from St. Estèphe this day, and, unfortunately, only 2 others thereafter: Cos d’Estournel & Montrose. I’ll discuss those in my next post regarding some Châteaux appointments we had on April 10th. It has been pretty wildly documented that St. Estèphe experienced a rather severe hail storm on the 1st of Sept. This caused some panic and some vignerons picked too early, ending up with unripe, harsh, green tannins and hollow mid-palates. Lafon-Rochet was extremely woody and disjointed. Phélan Ségur had a thin middle and short finish. Meyney was hard and dry and Tronquoy-Lalande was very difficult to enjoy. I think you have to be careful with 2011 St. Estèphe. I believe Montrose made the best wine ahead of Cos d’Estournel, but you still see some of the vintage’s less desirable parts in both of these wines. Don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed them a great deal, but they are nowhere near their ‘09 and ‘10 counterparts. I’ll discuss these two properties in greater detail in the days to come. Tasted: Meyney, Tronquoy-Lalande, Phélan Ségur, Lafon-Rochet.
2011 Pauillac
I think Pauillac made some pretty decent wines and in certain instances (Pontet-Canet, Pichon Baron, and Grand Puy Lacoste, I believe some excellent wines were made. Unfortunately, we did not get to taste too much from Pauillac on this day, but we did get to taste Pontet-Canet, Lynch-Bages, and Pichon-Baron at their respective Châteaux on April 10th. I’ll detail those tastings in 2011 Bordeaux Futures Post #3. On this tasting day, I enjoyed Grand-Puy-Lacoste a great deal. It had good deep fruit, balance and freshness. Pichon-Baron on this day was firmer than I’ll report in next post. Les Forts de Latour was very good, but it should be for $200 plus per bottle. Petit Mouton was actually enjoyable and it usually isn’t En Primeur. Clerc-Milon had more concentration than d’Armailhac, but was still nothing to get too excited about. I’ve also heard that Haut-Batailley was really good, but I unfortunately did not get to taste it. I think there was some up and down, but the ones who got it right made some pretty strong wines. Tasted: Haut-Bages-Libéral, Grand-Puy-Ducasse, d'Armailhac, Clerc-Milon, Grand-Puy-Lacoste, Petit Mouton, Pichon-Baron, Forts de Latour.
2011 St. Julien
To me, St. Julien was the most consistent appellation in 2011. The Cabernet was noble, sweet, pure and ripe enough, albeit lacking a bit of concentration for some wines. Gloria was excellent and you should check it out for the money (around $50 bucks last year). It had good freshness, clean fruit, good length and balance: very pleasing wine that should drink well early and for the medium term. Lagrange wasn’t bad, but a bit light. Branaire-Ducru was quite good with above-average concentration and a creamy mid-palate lifted by acidity and fine tannins to finish long. This should drink well young and for a good while. 2011 St. Pierre was another strong effort from this fast emerging gem of a property. On a side note, I tasted a bottle of ‘09 while I was there. What a delicious wine that is already drinking beautifully. I actually think ‘10 might be better, and ‘11 is no slouch. It’s very open and aromatic already and should also prove an early drinker with fine, soft tannins and plenty of freshness. Beychevelle was too extracted. I never like this wine and can’t believe Asian markets pay what they do for it. All three Léovilles were strong efforts with Las Cases leading the way. LLC was very closed in the nose, but with some coaxing revealed some pretty floral and lead pencil aromatics. This was an attractive and always classy wine that also seemed to invite early drinking and good length to last in the cellar. Not sure this will last as long as ‘09 and definitely not as long as ‘10, but this is a nice wine if the price is right. 2011 Léoville-Poyferré was as it should be: a pretty, medium to full bodied wine that all can enjoy. It had the most concentration behind LLC, and good high acid to keep you salivating for more. There is a certain harmony in Poyferré that is much like a Burgundy, but certainly one on performance enhancing drugs. Clos du Marquis was thin and forgettable. I liked Léoville-Barton, as I usually do. You must be patient with this wine, but this was good. Tasted: Gloria, Talbot, Lagrange, Langoa-Barton, Branaire-Ducru, St. Pierre, Beychevelle, Léoville-Barton, Léoville-Poyferré, Petit Lion du Marquis de las Cases, Clos du Marquis, Léoville Las Cases.
It was a long day of tasting and actually a very exhausting experience. Tasting wine is a very physical enterprise, and although you may think at first glance that this is all fun and games, you actually have to really concentrate and get your mind in the right place to taste this many wines in one sitting. The tannins seem to build on your teeth and palate like snow on a snow ball rolling down a hill. You have to break it up with plain bread and water and give yourself breaks in between. Your palate gets fatigued and each wine becomes more and more difficult to analyze. After 4 vintages of tasting En Primeur, I find it to be more efficient and informative to taste this way vs. attending the UGC walk-around, cow to the trough tastings held in each appellation. I also strongly encourage you to drink beer after you taste this many wines. Your palate will thank you the next day. Naturally, since this day was so grueling with nearly 100 wines, Billy and I needed to refresh the palate with some beer. We went to Café Brun in Bordeaux center. I love this place and always meet some interesting folks in the trade as well as some very friendly locals. The beer is cold and in big mugs, so we sat and drank to the 2011 vintage and tried to recount the long day of tasting. In Post #3, we head into the Médoc to visit Pichon Baron, Lynch-Bages, Pontet-Canet, Montrose, and Cos d’Estournel in a series of Château appointments. In Post #4, we’ll show you around St. Emilion by way of photos and culinary exploits on Easter Sunday. There will be a Post #5 to wrap things up in due time, but please don’t yell at me if this takes me a while. Manhattan Wine Company is a busy place these days! ;) MT










