Quantifying—11:30 AM, Tuesday, April 28th, 2020
Everything adds up to something large eventually, positive or negative, provided the increments are not equivalent to zero. However, things of little magnitude take longer to add up than things of bigger magnitude, if there is a certain desired magnitude.
It is easy to analyze numbers. It is easy to perform in-depth analyses when everything can be quantified and compared relative to one another. Perhaps that is part of the appeal of video games; so many things in video games are quantified, making it easy to figure out the next best course of action.
Life, on the other hand, is not easily quantified. Granted, age, grades, income, years married, and the number of pets and children are all numbers. However, if such numbers were enough to describe one's entire life, then that life would probably have been a little drab, maybe even meaningless, as harsh as that sounds.
When we read books or consume other storytelling media, we are often focused on the qualities. The color of the sky, the softness of cotton candy, the speed trees racing by outside the car...
One does not simply put numbers to these. Of course, it is possible. The color of the sky cold probably be broken down into a string of numbers, hardness is measured by scratch tests—though I suppose that may be difficult for a subject like cotton candy, and one may easily look down at the car's speedometer.
However, in these cases, the descriptive adjectives mean so much more, bringing so much more connotation with them, than the cold numbers. There is beauty in the way our world functions.
However, it is difficult. Being unable to quantify something may mean being unable to compare it to another. It is like when one is asked to choose between two things they love, and the answer is that "they are uncomparable."
Can we define tasks that have a short required time and a quick pay-off as having a small magnitude while other tasks have a large magnitude? Is magnitude linear? It seems to exist on several different planes, but perhaps that is just a testament of how complicated our world is.
I am probably running around in circles at this point. I have the image in my head, and my words are making sense to me, but because of omitted information, it seems like random blabbering on paper.
That is okay too, I suppose.
When it comes down to it, these posts are very, very little in magnitude compared to everything else, but I think I have perhaps been more persistent about them than anything else, recently.
Everything is strange, but wonderful, I suppose. It is better to define what we cannot understand as "beautiful" than to labor away pondering at it, than to struggle to come to terms and ultimately hate the world around us.
Words with double meanings that we will use, faking it until we make it, if we will ever make it.