
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Romania
seen from China
seen from New Zealand
seen from Brazil
seen from New Zealand
seen from China
seen from Japan
seen from Romania

seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Thailand
seen from Thailand
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Yemen
Saw this abhorrent take on Instagram today. Basically this assistant principal thinks that parents should check their children's phones often because kids don't know how to act.
I'm primarily a kidfluencing account, but the idea of being anti-kidfluencing is inherently intertwined with the idea of youth liberation.
The idea of kids having online safety can and should co-exist with the idea of kids having privacy. Full stop.
Can we talk about dhmis as a metaphor for kidfluencing and family youtube channels? (BTW I'm not saying this is the correct point of view or not because its probably not) just pointing out that a lot of the themes in dhmis line up with the practices of family channels.
Roy makes a kid a part of his content, and when other people point out how that's wrong, they get kicked from the show.
Yellow guy says that his dad is a computer, a possible reference to the disconnect he feels towards his own father, as his father is more of his online boss instead of a nurturing figure.
A lot of the harmful messages found in children's TV is even more prevalent on children's youtube, and we need to talk about that.
Here's an awakening some of yall need!
Gentle parenting accounts are still exploiting their children
Scripted content accounts are still exploiting their children
Accounts with low follower counts are still exploiting their children
Accounts you think are "doing it right" are still. Exploiting. Their. Children.
I can advocate for child safety on the internet without kicking kids off the internet completely.
I can admit that children need support from adults other than their parents while also remaining wary of adults online.
I can acknowledge the privilege of certain children while still recognizing children as an opressed group.
In the same way, I can recognize the privileges of family vlogger children while still condemning the family's actions, no matter how much money they've made.
I am capable of the logical procressing to make both true. I am able to protect myself.
Family vlogging is child labor trafficking and we need to be talking about this.
Forcing your children to be in videos with you so that you can make money? Force.
Promising your children a cut of that money and then spending it all? Fraud.
Convincing your children to be in videos by threatening them with their salary, embarrassing photographs online, physical harm? Coercion.
Not to mention the sheer amount of financial abuse and manipulation that goes on in these families to keep their kids silent.
Haha laugh hiding real pain
Happy data privacy week! Here's some pointers and reminders on posting your children online!
-most content on CP websites was posted by the parents first. Just because you think the photo you posted was innocuous, doesn't mean it doesn't exist somewhere on a malicious website.
- teaching your kids about internet privacy and forbidding them from posting on social media, getting a phone etc. Does NOTHING for them if you're not following those rules yourself. ESPECIALLY if you're going around posting images of your children.
-set boundaries with your family members about not reposting or sharing content of your children outside of a group chat.
-a pictures worth a thousand words yadda yadda BUT- physical pictures are worth a gazillion. And they minimize the risk of people stealing images of your children.