What are we to take from this? Is it that because fellows of the AAP don't get paid to choke children that choking deaths are deaths, but because they ARE paid to mutilate children circumcision deaths are 'case reports?'
Whether penis-cutting enthusiasts call deaths and maimings 'adverse events' or 'case reports' the fact is that non-therapeutic, non-consensual circumcision is a mutilation, and any doctor who would deign to use even a tiny fraction of his or her brain to investigate the ethical issues would have to admit that fact. ~Devon
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100226212559.htm
http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/New-AAP-Policy-on-Choking-Prevention.aspx
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.full.pdf