Now that the honeymoon phase for my hyperfixation with Gladiator II ended I can talk about what I disliked about the movie, specially compared to the first one. These are loose thoughts btw.
To me, it felt too... hopeful? And I feel like that rags to riches, good guy wins in the end thing doesn't go well with a movie about the Roman Empire, considering the way it crashed and burned.
I feel like Macrinus should've "won", since that's what happened irl, and it would be an interesting shift of expectations. If he had won we'd also get a neat segue into any possible sequels of spin offs with Elagabalus (I imagine a flamboyant empress/emperor with genderqueer elements could make for good television)
I also wished we has seen more of the twins mother, even a passing comment of her being away or something would be enough.
And finally, I've seen people complaining about how disjointed the first movie feels to the second one, and I agree. I think there's untapped potential in exploring what happened between movies, like a miniseries exploring the year of the five emperors and the Severan dynasty.













