Question about therapeutic writing
As an editor, I sometimes have to discern whether a piece of writing based on someone's personal pain is ready for publication. IMO, there is a wide gulf between therapeutic writing and true literature. That said, they are definitely related!
I think there are three stages in this progression.
Stage 1. The feeling is raw. You're writing to deal with it, but you're also writing to create authentic source-material for later.
Stage 2. The feeling is exorcised. You no longer need to write therapeutically, but you are not ready to write artistically either. You don't have enough distance yet. You let the material lie fallow.
Stage 3. The idea returns in a transformed shape. You are now able to create an artistic "imitation" or representation of the feeling/experience you once went through. You review the therapeutic writing to draw inspiration and authenticity from it. The purpose of this second writing is truly creative and aesthetic. It is not self-indulgent, it is well structured and grounded, and the reader is able to relate to it.