#China #guangzhou #circle by #DanielRich #amwriting #screenwriting #tvwriting #painting #songwriting #nycgratitude #freecaleo (at New York, New York)

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Japan

seen from Poland

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from Brazil

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
#China #guangzhou #circle by #DanielRich #amwriting #screenwriting #tvwriting #painting #songwriting #nycgratitude #freecaleo (at New York, New York)
MARKING: describe your tattoos,or tattoos you would like in the future?
-- Eu sempre quis fazer um apanhador de sonhos na costela. Acho o significado e tudo mais, muito bacana! É um amuleto da cultura indígena e eu acho fascinante! Mas... como tenho medo de agulhas, tudo bem pode rir... uma enfermeira com medo de agulhas, pois é. Mas, como eu tinha muita vontade fui fazer uma temporária. Só que o cara só tinha de um tipo. Resultou no meu pescoço cheio de estrelas coloridas, por sorte saíram em duas semanas. E sim, eu esfreguei muito.
Interview with Daniel Rich
Carbon 12 is delighted to present the exhibition “On a Boat, Looking to Land”, a curated exhibition showing the new works of Gil Heitor Cortesão and Daniel Rich. On the occasion of the upcoming show Liese Van Kerckhoven interviewed artist Daniel Rich.
Daniel Rich, “Pyongyang ice skating rink” (2015)
Your painting process is really precise and intense: layer after layer you deconstruct and reconstruct an image and even the colors are made/mixed by yourself. I could say ‘humanity' isn’t there as figures in your paintings but in the hand of the painter. Is this physical intense process in the first place a visual choice or is there another reason too?
My process developed from my background as a printmaker, which I studied in school, specifically screen printing and etching. Looking back, skateboarding and painting graffiti, along with Robert Rauschenberg’s use of appropriated imagery such as newspaper clippings, screen printed photographs and found objects in his work had a big influence on me as a young artist.
I think conceptually, the visual language of schematic architectural and technical renderings is relevant to the way I work, which is more of a literal connection, but I am also referencing the graphic qualities of the print, television and online news media. There is a certain ambivalence or documentary quality in the way that these places are represented - I am interested in calling that into question.
Additionally to the works on acrylic you are working on works on paper. Why did you choose for this addition of other material and technique?
Working on paper with spray paint allows me to work through ideas much more fluidly than the very labor intensive acrylic paintings. This lent itself especially well to “On a Boat, Looking to Land”, because after making a few works on paper, I began to notice that the architectural element of the staircase was popping up repeatedly, and after seeing Gil’s painting “Hall of Mirrors” drawing a connection to his work.
The painting technique of the works on paper is essentially the same as for the acrylic paintings. Spraying paint allows for more experimentation, and I enjoy blending and fading the colors into each other which results in a more atmospheric affect, a softer visual quality and a different psychological space within the images.
Daniel Rich, “Terraces” (2015)
You translate photos of architecture into paintings in order to invest the power of the picture to evoke larger social meanings and political intentions. How do you think your mediation as painter can form our perception on these physical structures by ‘reproducing’ these images?
Appropriating imagery is a tool that allows me to re-present an image by taking it out of context and deconstructing it and therefore calling its meaning into question. The potential divergence and duality of images - the shifting of the significance and meaning in both images of places and the places themselves are what is interesting to me.
How important is it for the viewer to know the original image or context to understand the social and political layers behind the represented buildings and structures?
I think the simple documentary titles of my works are intended to give my paintings some initial context that might get the viewer thinking about why I am presenting a painting of an image for their consideration. Often I do rely on an installation of multiple paintings to inform one another and to reflect meaning and questions back onto each other.
Sometimes, the building or place depicted in the painting is recognized by the viewer because of a personal connection, an interest in architecture, contemporary news events or a memory of seeing the building in person. But it is important to me that the work engages people visually first and hopefully this leads to a dialogue and further investigation into a subject.
How do you choose the images? For example for the paintings in the show ‘On a Boat, Looking to Land’: do they have something particular in common?
For ‘On a Boat, Looking to Land’, I assembled a group of works that present the viewer with a more “psychological” space to contemplate as much as spaces that are politically charged. Some of the works speak more to ideas about individuality such as “Villa Lobos, Sao Paulo”, “Stairwell, Chicago” and “Diving Tower”, and others speak more to a mass collectivity- “Chand Baori, India”, “Satellite Dishes” and “Terraces” for example. Gil’s paintings of interior and exterior modernist structures and scenes were an inspiration for me to consider parallels in the images I was choosing.
I’m very curious about the context behind ‘Diving Tower’, one of your works in the show. What is the story behind this work?
What drew me to “Diving Tower” initially was the potential to emphasize the psychological space within the image. The viewer projects him/ herself into the scene and is very much alone with the structure in the moment. The act of jumping off a diving tower calls for trust in oneself, commitment and self- reflection. In a way, this is what an artist goes through when they embark on a new work, a new project or exhibition. This diving tower is located on a lake and built for pleasure- I enjoyed changing the time of day from the source image and transforming it into an eerie and uncanny scene that seems to be a part of a narrative and hopefully encourages the viewers imagination.
Daniel Rich, Diving Tower (2015)
For more information about the show visit our website: http://carbon12dubai.com/exhibitions/?status=upcoming
An exhibition of new work at Carbon 12 Gallery in Dubai.
"Drone", Acrylic Enamel on Poly Panel, 54 x 53", 2011.
A painting of an unmanned Drone cockpit. The Drone has become the ultimate symbol of power yet it is an anonymous, secretive object that his operated from afar and out of view. We hear so much about them but we rarely see what they look like. I was struck by the care and intention put into the design of it as weapon and the implications of that.
Top: ”Server”, Acrylic and Enamel on Poly Panel, 37x31x1.5”, 2011. This piece was initially made in response to the revolutions in the Middle East. I found the modernist, minimal design of the server, which seemingly references a bookshelf in a library or archive as well as Donald Judd’s Stacks drawing interesting connections with the server’s function as a storage or conduit for information.
Bottom: ”MIRA”, Acrylic and Enamel on Poly Panel, 20x16x1.5”, 2011.This small piece pictures IBM’s new super computer “MIRA”. I chose this image for its references to the architectural monolith and shrine and, as with the server, the implications of the rapid advancement of computer technology.
"Ice Rink, Pyongyang" (72 x 59") and "Pyongyang Ice Rink" (32 x 26"), both Acrylic on Dibond, 2015. As I sometimes do, I’ve made a large and a small painting of this image. I am interested in the scale of each painting speaking to the idea of the monument and whether it is possible to revoke that monumentality, the fluid role of the viewer as subject or as voyeur and the ability of the painting to point to the significance of a pictorial architecture as it is represented in media and the potential divergence in meaning of the places themselves.
"Tokyo", 2013, Acrylic on Dibond, 84 x 86".