Bots: A definition and some historical threads
Allison Parrish defines bots as being procedural, uncreative, data-driven, and as graffiti. Excerpt from her essay:
Bots are procedural.
A bot’s content is automatically generated without human intervention, using a set of predetermined rules and procedures. In this sense, bots are among the latest development in a literary practice that stretches back at least to John Clark’s “Eureka Machine,” created in 1845. The Eureka Machine was not a general-purpose computer, but instead a cabinet-sized purpose-built machine that produced randomly-generated poetry (in particular, Latin hexameter verse). Examples of the use of procedure in 20th- and 21st-century literary arts include Jackson Mac Low’s asymmetries, Charles Hartman’s “Sentences,” and Nick Montfort’s ppg256, a sequence of short Perl programs that generate poetry.
Spammers, of course, use procedural writing because it makes it possible to create millions and millions of tweets (or blog comments, or e-mails, or text messages, etc.) without expending any human labor, beyond programming the procedure. Poets often use procedural writing methods because they produce unexpected turns of phrase: juxtapositions of words and concepts that would never occur to a writer using only their inspiration and intuition.
A Twitter bot that exemplifies the procedural nature of bots is Liam Cooke’s @poem_exe, a Twitter bot that produces ingenious, collage haiku (and haiku-like poems) by randomly juxtaposing lines from an existing corpus of haiku. These poems are sometimes humorous or nonsensical, but more often than not, they’re simply beautiful: peaceful, serene, evocative.
Read full essay here.






