Tigers, Chimps, and Orcas, Oh My! Examining Animal Welfare within the Private Ownership Industry in the United States
Author: Dahlia Edwards. 2025.
This thesis examines the private ownership industry of charismatic megafauna in the United States and analyzes relevant United States legislation to determine the industry’s impact on animal welfare. Through the analysis of three case studies – tigers, chimpanzees, and orcas – chosen based on the species’ relevancy and environmental differences, the thesis provides real-world insights into how interactions between privately owned entities and legal frameworks can influence the quality of life these animals experience. Using a systematic literature review, three detailed case studies, and content analysis of various forms of selected media, the thesis unflinchingly exposes the damaging captivity practices, inexcusable living conditions, and associated welfare conditions experienced by many privately owned animals. The author adroitly traces these injustices back to a litany of legislative gaps, inconsistent regulatory oversights, and the double-edged sword of media and public perception. The discussion concludes with five recommendations for how policymakers and planners might more effectively address cases of animal cruelty and prioritize animal welfare. I won’t lie – this thesis is a tough read for anyone with a heart, and the findings will stay with you long after you have put the document down. I believe this is a very special thesis that deserves to be recognized for the valuable contribution that it makes towards advancing animal rights and welfare in the US.
This thesis examines the private ownership industry of charismatic megafauna in the United States and analyzes relevant United States legislation to determine the industry’s impact
on animal welfare. Through the analysis of three case studies – tigers, chimpanzees, and orcas – chosen based on the specie’s relevancy and environmental differences, it provides real-world insights on how interactions between privately owned entities and legal frameworks can influence the quality of life these animals experience. Research methods included utilizing a systematic literature review, three detailed case studies, and content analysis of various forms of
selected media. Key findings highlighted consistent concerns regarding inadequate captivity practices or conditions and the associated welfare implications, legislative gaps and inconsistent regulatory oversight, and the role of media on the public perception of charismatic megafauna.
The discussion concludes with five recommendations for how policymakers and planners might more effectively address cases of animal cruelty and prioritize animal welfare.
