#fatwas

[bisexual-bucks]

Sam Wilson in The Falcon and The Winter Soldier 1x04

[palecomputerduck]

“I dOn’T wAnT ShARon tO bE REDUCED to LOVE interest.”

And I don’t want to see misogynistic hateful talk about her for just existing near Bucky Barnes.

But here we are. Here we fucking are. 

[palecomputerduck]

Sam Wilson and that shield catch 👌👀

[susanbslamthony]

MCU Headcanon

Between CACW and Infinity War, Steve and Sam spent significant time in Wakanda. Here’s why--- Old Man Steve is totally counter to everything we’ve seen about Bucky’s and Steve’s relationship. He throws away a lot of friendships and what little life he’s built for himself (not to mention messing up the lives of Sam and Sharon) to save and support Bucky. He talks about needing to “be there” for Bucky. How Bucky is his best friend and blah blah intense feelings. But from what we’ve seen on screen, Steve and Bucky have hardly spent any time together before Steve abandons him to go back to the 1940s. They have those great on screen moments in CACW, then Steve shows up in Wakanda at the beginning of Infinity War and it’s time for the big battle with Thanos,  Bucky turns to dust, and then Bucky and Steve are only back together for a few days(?), weeks(?) between the final Endgame battle and when Steve goes back in time. That is not enough time to support your formerly brainwashed assassin best friend dealing with PTSD, and Steve absolutely wouldn’t abandon Bucky just for his own happiness... unless... While Steve and Sam were on the run between Civil War and Infinity War, they actually spent a fair amount of time in Wakanda hanging out with Bucky. They were international fugitives and all, but once Bucky was brought back out of cryo, they must have visited, and had time to get to a place where Bucky could tell Steve it was okay for him to leave Bucky on his own. There’s a little bit of evidence -- 1. Sam knows enough about the Dora Milaje to warn Walker about them, which is only possible if he’s been hanging around Wakanda  2. There’s no other time in what we’ve seen that Bucky and Steve would have been able to have a conversation about who gets the shield after Steve, and yet in FATWS, Bucky says Steve told him he was going to give the shield to Sam If Steve and Bucky have been hanging out in Wakanda for a year or two talking and supporting each other, Bucky might have gotten to the point that he is doing better. They might have had a conversation where Bucky tells Steve not worry about him anymore, put his own happiness first. With that kind of support from Bucky, Steve’s decision makes sense. 

[journalistcafe]

जानिये लखनऊ में कोरोना पीड़ितों के अंतिम संस्कार को लेकर क्या आया फतवा?

लखनऊ : दारुल उलूम फिरंगी महली द्वारा जारी एक फतवे Fatwa में कहा गया है कि कोरोनोवायरस से मरने वालों को पूरे धार्मिक रीति-रिवाजों के साथ सम्मान से सुपुर्द-ए-खाक करना चाहिए और उनके शरीर को अछूत नहीं माना जाना चाहिए।

Phatava गुरुवार रात को जारी किया गया

Fatwa गुरुवार रात को जारी किया गया था। इसके एक दिन पहले ही मुस्लिमों के एक वर्ग ने लखनऊ के ऐशबाग कब्रिस्तान में कोरोना से मरे पहले मरीज को दफनाने से…

View On WordPress

[itsthesiliconreview]

Dubai launched an Artificial Intelligence(AI) based app called ‘Virtual Ifta’ on Tuesday, it is said to be the world’s first serviced which is completely based on AI to issue fatwas,

[westminsterinstitute]

Transcript: https://westminster-institute.org/events/wael-farouq/

In his new book, Egyptian scholar Wael Farouq addresses such issues as tribal culture in Arab identity, the invention of the Caliphate, and the history and the role of the fatwā, including an analysis of what European Muslims are looking for as shown in their requests for fatwās today. Throughout, he examines the deeper roots of the perilous predicament of Arab reason revealed in the contemporary clash between religious and modernist discourse.

Professor Farouq is currently professor of Arabic language, literature and culture at the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of the Catholic University of Milan (Italy) and at the Faculty of Linguistic Sciences and Foreign Literatures of the same university. Previously, he has been professor of Arabic language at the American University in Cairo (Egypt), Straus Fellow at the Straus Institute for the Advanced Study of Law and Justice at the University of New York, and vice president of the Cairo Meeting.

He is author of several books and essays in Arabic, Italian and English in the field of Islamic studies and on contemporary Islamic thinking. Among other publications, he is a contributing author of the book Dio salvi la ragione (“God Save Reason”, Cantagalli, 2007) with Pope Benedict XVI, and coauthor of the book Pope Benedict XVI’s Legal Thought: A Dialogue on the Foundation of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015). He has recently published two books: Conflicting Arab Identities – Language, Tradition and Modernity (Muta, 2018) and Discourse Analysis of the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity (Bibliotheca Alexandrina, 2018).

An excerpt from his monograph Hats and Turbans:  Adaptation to Modernity and Conventional Mind, (New York, 2012), can be read at: http://www.almuslih.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=295:modernity-between-exclusion-and-identification&catid=44:islam-in-history&Itemid=214.

For a companion lecture, see Robert Reilly’s Westminster talk, Not What Went Wrong in the Arab World, but Why It Went Wrong: A Theological Answer.

[westminsterinstitute]

Read the transcript: https://westminster-institute.org/events/daniel-brubaker/

Daniel Brubaker, PhD, is a scholar of Qurʾan manuscripts of the 7th-10th centuries AD, the earliest period of the book’s existence. He defended his doctoral dissertation titled “Intentional Changes in Qurʾan Manuscripts” and was awarded his PhD at Rice University in Houston in 2014. Since then he has continued his work researching corrections in early Qurʾans. To date, Brubaker has analyzed approximately 10,000 early Qurʾan manuscript folios, most in person, in institutions and libraries in Paris, St. Petersburg, Oxford, Cambridge, London, Dublin, Doha, Manama, Kuwait, Tashkent, and elsewhere.

The work with history and antiquities is not a sterile pursuit; although the manuscript research is full of theological and historical implications, the Qurʾan is more than a mere artifact of history. Along with Islam’s other sources of authority such as the hadith, commentaries, biography of Muhammad, etc., the Qurʾan is the cornerstone of a belief system that continues to impact real events in the world today. This is because what people believe affects what they do.

Brubaker believes it is important to understand that not all ideas are equal, and that as Americans we need to think carefully about the heritage we have in our system of limited government that includes checks and balances, the affirmation of certain rights as given by God and therefore un-alienable, the affirmation that all people are created equal, and the embrace of the Bill of Rights including freedom of speech and press and the exercise of religion. How we navigate our encounters as a nation with a system of belief that sees some of these things as illegitimate is a very important question.

Dr. Brubaker’s Qurʾan manuscript research is forthcoming in print in the form of an academic monograph as well as two books designed for a more general audience. Much of it is also becoming available through Qurʾan Gateway, an online digital research tool for academics.

Brubaker is a member of the Islamic Manuscript Association, the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa, and the International Qurʾanic Studies Association. He is also on the editorial board of the Review of Qurʾanic Research.

For more on the history of Islam, see Robert Spencer’s Westminster talk, The History of Jihad.