Same-sex attraction is different from opposite-sex attraction, but how are we to understand this difference? Paul Egerston (1935-2011) was a retired bishop in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and also the father of a gay son. In an article he wrote for parents, he presents four common ways in which homosexuality is viewed within different parts of the Christian community. He says some Christians view homosexuality as REBELLION, some see it as an ILLNESS OR ADDICTION, some see it as BROKENNESS, and some see it simply as a DIFFERENCE, a natural variant.
Wendy VanderWal-Gritter, Generous Spaciousness, chapter 4 (emphasis mine)
I'm not even sure where VanderWal-Gritter stands (maybe she reveals it at the end of the book), but Generous Spaciousness introduces a lot of fresh and insightful vocabulary that I believe will help make future conversations go smoother.
I explained just the other day to my best friend how the church has changed its reaction to homosexuality with very little reference to Scripture. It's all been about how we see the principles we believe in actually playing out in the real world. We've gone from exiling and abandoning people as rebels, to treating them with therapy to overcome their disorder, and now to just trying to help them with their particular brokenness or "cross to bear."
And this is all because each method proved to end with a non-Christlike result. And now many Christians are starting to move into the Difference category. There's no particular Bible verse we looked at that said, "Don't treat gay people with ex-gay therapy, and don't force them to remain celibate." We just looked at the results of our beliefs and saw them causing damage and said, "This is not of God."