They say teachers are the most important school-based determinant of student achievement. Not only do teachers pass on knowledge to their students, but teachers also serve as role models who inspire and encourage students to strive for greatness, live to the fullest potential, and do good in society. I enrolled in a Ph.D. program at Penn State because I wanted to be an educator that does all those positive things listed above. Throughout graduate school, I have worried about passing the qualifying exams. I have worried about getting my works published. I have worried about finding a tenure-track position once I graduate. What never really concerned me was my paychecks. Being a graduate student, I obviously wasn't paid as well as some of my other friends who have gone on to become medical doctors, lawyers, financial analysts, etc. However, I was very aware of the financial limitations of being a graduate student and I carefully calculated every penny I spent so I would not be overwhelmed with those limitations. While I was able to get by for the most part, even my careful budgeting wasn’t enough when I became an instructor for a summer course that was cross-listed in two departments.
I was excited about the opportunity to teach, again, for the reasons listed above, but I certainly was not excited about the $2,500 (before taxes) I received for the summer that I taught. I taught for five days a week, an hour and 15 minutes each day, for six consecutive weeks. Being a responsible teacher, I devoted myself fully to the six weeks that I taught, which meant I spent far beyond an hour and 15 minutes every day on teaching. Preparing PowerPoint slides, lectures, group activities, discussion questions, practice quizzes, and exams easily took eight hours a day. Since I was on a $2,500 stipend, I only received $1,667 (again, before taxes) for one month. Given that the average rent is close to $1,000 a month, I didn't have much money left for other basic needs. It was the first time in my five years in the graduate program that I felt abandoned and exploited by my department. I had roughly 18 students in my class. Each student had to pay $2,821 for my three credit course, which adds up to the $50,778 that the University would receive in tuition from 18 students. Yet, my stipend was only 5% of the total tuition the University received from the students for this course. Where did the rest of the money go? Yes, the University had to pay for infrastructure, classroom equipment, staff, etc., which is all understandable, but were my efforts as an instructor really only worth 5% of the tuition paid by the 18 students?
I raise this issue because perhaps like some students, I thought budgeting carefully and not ordering a beer when I went out would help me through graduate school without going into debt. But it shouldn't be this way, particularly when the University receives so much money from students' tuition. Graduate employees, particularly graduate instructors, at Penn State are not alone. There are thousands of other graduate instructors, adjunct professors, and non-tenure track professors who struggle as underpaid educators. How could the University expect me to devote myself to educating undergrads when I have to worry about putting food on my table? Or perhaps Penn State is sending a message to its undergraduate students and parents that its main focus is not on providing the most excellent education? Because if the administrators really care about undergraduate education, why would they pay their graduate instructors less than 5% of the total tuition received for a course with 18 students?