but telling people characterization is important is meeeaaaaaannnnnn :( :( :(
[re: this post yesterday because i sent this ask to drafts like a FOOL]
dude you wanna talk mean, i keep seeing that one post that's like "i think a good writer can make mischaracterization good actually!" and all the replies being like "YEAH you just have to figure out what WOULD make him say that!" and i just sit here like uh
the problem there is.
that "a good writer" is not. most of the people on this website. and a lot of that is because people are SHIT at media analysis and don't understand that yeah, actually, you need a firm grasp on characterization to even BEGIN to determine what would make him say that, and then even more analysis and consideration to construct the circumstances themselves! You Need The Characterization To Make "Mischaracterization" Work.
but no we have to be sooo niceys and never call out the way parts of every. single. fandom. i've ever been in. feeds characters into archetypes which are PREDOMINANTLY informed by unexamined biases instead of considering them as A Specific Character In A Specific Story. it does actually fucking matter if you characterize every taller character as masculine, stupid, aggressive tops and every shorter character as effeminate, submissive, intellectual bottoms. that does in fact impact how you perceive people in real life. it is actually a fucking problem.
















