#kris jenner

[mysharona1987]

This feels more depressing than anything.

Instead of looking like a weird alien 25 year old, you could look like Kim Cattrall or Jamie Lee Curtis.

Hey, man. Even Betty White was famously catching the romantic attention of Ryan Reynolds when she was 99.

And she did not need several face lifts.

[omgthatdress]

Can Kris Jenner move her face anymore? I'm being so serious rn. She got that doctor-stepped-on-my-back-and-pulled facelift, and it's giving Bolaire Lothalia.

[kaliforniaaajenner]

kardashianshulu: on set with kylie 🤍 #TheKardashians

[childlost1313]

Be yourself ~

[msterpicasso]

Kylie Jenner wearing her inspired Balmain dress by Olivier Rousteing (2024)

[cosmicmemoirr]

ASTRO HOT TAKE: THE DEVIL WORKS HARD BUT KRIS JENNER’S ARUDHA LAGNA WORKS HARDER 🦂

You know how people always say Kris Jenner gives “Scorpio energy”?

They’re right but...

They’re just reading the wrong part of the chart. 🔍

In Vedic astrology, her Arudha Lagna is in Scorpio… with Rahu. 🦂

Scorpio alone already triggers suspicion.

intensity

secrecy

“something’s going on…”

But Scorpio with Rahu?

that’s suspicion on steroids.

Not just:

“hmm…”

It’s:

“yeah no… she’s definitely orchestrating something behind the scenes.”

And here’s where it gets funny.

Her Arudha Lagna sits in the 3rd house

media

narrative

what gets repeated

So people don’t just think she’s controlling…

they repeat it

they build theories around it

they reinforce it publicly

You’ll literally hear the same line over and over:

“she’s a mastermind controlling the narratives behind the scenes.”

“She’s controlling her daughters”

At that point, it’s not even about what she’s doing.

It’s about what people have collectively decided she must be doing.

Arudha Lagna shows the story people agree on.🪞

If you’ve ever wondered how you’re actually perceived by others…🪞

Not who you are privately, but the version of you people interact with, project onto, and build narratives around, that’s your Arudha Lagna.

It’s the difference between:

who you are vs. the story people tell about you.

I offer a deeper insight via readings focused on:

• public perception

• personal branding

• how people interpret your energy

• and how to work with it, not against it

If you’re interested, check the pinned post for details. 🔍

[trexalicious]

An excellent and brutal read from Ratu Rara on FB with some rather juicy rumors...

If there’s ever been a duo more committed to the art of public contradiction, it’s Harry and Meghan Markle. The self-proclaimed privacy warriors have managed yet again to turn a simple party invite into an epic saga of deleted photos, celebrity desperation, and social climbing so obvious it practically comes with a grappling hook.

Let’s set the scene. Kris Jenner turned 70, and obviously that called for a bash so extravagant even Jeff Bezos lent his Beverly Hills mansion to host it — stars everywhere, designer gowns, the usual cloud of money-scented glitter.

Enter Harry and Meghan, crashing the spotlight faster than you can say, “We just want to live a quiet life.” Except not everyone noticed them for long. Fans realized something odd: the Sussexes were there one moment and gone the next. Poof — erased from Kim Kardashian’s Instagram carousel like an ex from your camera roll after a bad breakup. And Kris Jenner’s post? Same story.

How could the world’s most camera-happy couple suddenly develop a case of Insta shyness? According to People, the pair checked “no” on a photo consent form — a cute excuse if anyone believed it. Because really, Meghan Markle refusing a camera? That’s like the Kardashians refusing contouring. Impossible.

Social media detectives had their theories. Some said Meghan didn’t like how she looked in the photos — too candid, too real, not enough Photoshop sparkle. Others believed Kris’s PR team quietly yanked the images after realizing the internet wasn’t here for Meghan’s rebrand as Hollywood royalty. Because when you’re Kris Jenner, you’re the one doing the curating, not Meghan Markle.

Then there’s the juiciest rumor of all: Meghan and Harry weren’t even on the guest list. Allegedly, the golden ticket came via Serena Williams, who asked Kris mid-gala if her best friend forever could tag along. Imagine that — Harry and Meghan begging for a plus-one at Kris Jenner’s birthday party. The modern equivalent of texting, “Hey, can I come to a group chat you weren’t invited to?”

And yet, when they arrived, they played it like they owned the place — Meghan beaming under the paparazzi lights she supposedly hates, Harry grinning like a kid at Disneyland. No secret entrances for this couple — oh no. They strutted right through the front door, letting Backgrid photographers capture every perfectly posed smile. But once inside, suddenly they’re too private to be photographed? The math ain’t mathing.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This wasn’t a privacy move. This was PR damage control. Meghan’s PR team probably realized the photos didn’t pass her strategic glam checklist — wrong angle, wrong lighting, maybe a Kardashian looked better than her. Delete. Delete. Delete. Better to spin a story about protecting their boundaries than admit she lost the Instagram beauty contest.

But there’s another theory floating around — the Kardashians themselves pulled the plug. Apparently, after posting the pics, the comment section turned into a roast fest. People weren’t talking about Kris’s legendary party or Kim’s outfit; they were too busy dissecting Meghan’s facial expressions and Harry’s awkward energy. The Kardashians don’t share the spotlight for free. If the public attention shifts, the photos vanish. That’s the rule.

Still, let’s talk about what really burns people’s toast — the irony. Meghan Markle, the woman who’s done everything short of renting a billboard to stay in the headlines, now claiming she’s camera-shy. Please. She literally launched her career on red carpets and built her brand on interviews about her brand. This is someone who once ran a lifestyle blog where she described her boobs as “magical.”

Privacy isn’t the problem. Control is.

Meanwhile, Harry looked positively thrilled to be there. Of course he was — surrounded by Hollywood’s elite, cameras flashing, drinks flowing. It’s like the royal version of spring break. The man’s been touchy-feely in the most awkward ways for years — nipple-twisting teammates, chest-grabbing buddies, you name it. Thank heavens he managed to keep his hands to himself this time around.

While Meghan scanned the room for Bezos, Harry was reportedly fixated on Kris Jenner’s... uh, boobs. Classic hazard behavior. He’s got that same mischievous glint that once made British tabloids lose their minds. You can take the prince out of the palace, but you can’t take the party boy out of the prince.

And yet, while they partied it up in Beverly Hills, Princess Anne — an actual working royal — was across the world doing, you know, royal work. Paying respects at memorials, honoring veterans, representing the Crown with dignity. Compare that with Harry and Meghan’s version of service: chasing clout at a billionaire’s birthday bash. It’s not exactly the nobility flex they think it is.

The funniest part? The internet saw through it instantly. Privacy concerns became the running joke of the week. Memes everywhere. People imagined Meghan screaming “No photos!” while simultaneously calling her own paparazzi agency — because Backgrid doesn’t just show up by accident. Someone makes that call. Usually someone who wants to be seen.

So here’s what probably happened. Meghan heard about Kris’s massive party, begged a mutual to score her an invite, dragged Harry along, and showed up armed with a game plan to network her way into the Kardashian circle. Except the plan backfired. They got the photos, they got the attention — but not the kind they wanted. Kris’s team scrubbed them from the feed faster than you can say optics. The Kardashians don’t need Meghan’s controversy dragging down their algorithm.

It’s not that people hate ambition. Hollywood runs on ambition. It’s that Meghan refuses to own hers. She wants to be adored for her virtue while chasing celebrity harder than a TikTok influencer at Coachella. If she just admitted she loves fame, the world might actually respect her hustle. But instead, she hides behind PR statements and victim narratives, pretending she’s too deep for the very spotlight she craves.

And Harry? Once the cheeky prince — now downgraded to Meghan’s plus-one, clutching his drink in a sea of Botox and billionaires. But don’t worry, he looked happy. His entire existence has become one long awkward shrug.

Meanwhile, Meghan’s out here auditioning for relevance, hoping proximity to the Kardashians can reignite her fading celebrity. But Hollywood’s full of players — and Meghan’s not the one holding the cards. You can’t outmaneuver Kris Jenner. That woman built a billion-dollar empire out of selfies and scandal. If Meghan thought she could stage-manage her way into that inner circle, she learned the hard way: there’s only room for one queen of calculated chaos.

So, here’s the takeaway: the couple who fled Britain to escape the cameras now spend their days chasing them across Los Angeles. They talk about service but serve themselves. They speak of privacy but perform for attention. Every move is a contradiction, every excuse thinner than the plot of Meghan’s old Suits episodes.

The disappearing Instagram photos weren’t about boundaries — they were about branding. And in the ruthless world of celebrity optics, one misstep can erase you from the frame faster than Kim Kardashian’s Facetune brush.

At the end of the day, Harry and Meghan’s Hollywood chapter is less royal fairy tale and more reality TV crossover gone wrong. They wanted to be seen as powerful, independent icons. Instead, they’ve become punchlines at the world’s glitziest parties — always invited last, always leaving first, and always somehow vanishing right after the photos drop.

In other words: The Duke and Duchess of Irrelevance, starring in their favorite role yet — extras in someone else’s spotlight.

[pro-royalty]

Inside the 2026 Met Gala

photographed by Francesc Planes