Dumb shit that probably happened #3
Nesen: hey, spell me
Zen: m-e
Nesen: you forgot the 'd'
Zen: there's no 'd' in me
Nesen: not yet anyway
Zen:
Nesen: ;D
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
Dumb shit that probably happened #3
Nesen: hey, spell me
Zen: m-e
Nesen: you forgot the 'd'
Zen: there's no 'd' in me
Nesen: not yet anyway
Zen:
Nesen: ;D
I am not fooled. You don't care enough about me to send me an email from your Blackberry.
BREAKING NEWS: Sasse Campaign Manager Doesn't Know Meaning of the Word âPositiveâ
Time for somebody to go back to elementary school
OMAHA, Ne -Â In an interview with Nebraska Watchdog, Tyler Grassmeyer, told the news site that "Ben [Sasse] has crisscrossed Nebraska, running his campaign the Nebraska way, with a positive conservative message."
So what is a positive conservative message you ask?
Grassmeyer continued: "Everywhere Ben goes, his anti-Obamacare, anti-establishment message is resonating with Nebraska voters."
Got that? A positive conservative message these days is an anti message.
Let's check with the dictionary real quick on the definition of 'anti' just to make sure it hasn't changed:
preposition
opposed to; against.
adjective
opposed.
noun
a person opposed to a particular policy, activity, or idea.
Hmmm. Well maybe the definition of 'positive' has changed. Â Let's check:
adjective
constructive in intention or attitude.
showing optimism and confidence.
noun
a good, affirmative, or constructive quality or attribute.
Well, looks like 'anti' is still the opposite of 'positive' no matter how it gets used in a sentence.Â
Of course it could just be that what defines the Republican Party is what they stand in opposition to and not what they stand in support of. Â Oh right, they're no longer the party of ideas (of course we wouldn't give the Democrats that much credit either).
Considering members of Congress âon an individual basis,â Kerrey says, âyou should presume patriotism.â But he thinks congressional rules favor partisan gridlock: âI am campaigning to amend the Constitution to abolish both the Republican and Democratic caucuses. .â.â. We should not allow Congress to organize by party. How can you work with someone who is raising money to defeat you? The rules of Congress have to change, and they canât be trusted to rewrite their own rules.â
Good luck with that, Bob. (Seriously, this is an admirable idea)
The Most Important Election is Always Today
Matt Lewis (follow him), one of my favorite journalists, has published a thinly veiled endorsement of Nebraska State Treasurer Don Stenberg. You might be confused, of course, given that he only mentions Don twice in the entire article. At bottom, he suggests, we should trust organizations over individuals when it comes to listening to endorsements.
That's all well and good (although I think such an idea is overly simplistic).Â
Lewis seems to think Stenberg's relatively weak position in the polls is a consequence of his poor campaigning style. That's true, but it fails to account for the reasons why Stenberg is so bad at campaigning. Here's one:
Stenberg is the epitome of what so many Nebraskans have tired of in their representatives. Don is a career politician. This is his fourth Senate campaign and he's running for Senate just two years after winning a race for State Treasurer. Much like his opponent Jon Bruning, Don's been running for office since finishing school.Â
If Nebraskans wanted to send Don to the Senate, they might have done it in 1996. Instead, he was crushed in the primary by Chuck Hagel. He lost a close general election race to Ben Nelson in 2000 (although given the resounding win George W. Bush enjoyed in Nebraska, no GOP candidate should have lost). Finally, he lost to Pete Ricketts in 2006's GOP primary.
In no way do I wish to suggest that losing elections means you have bad ideas or are a bad person. Unfortunately, however, it does mean you're not a very good politician, and that counts for quite a bit more than the first two things in the real world. Tuesday's winner will face Bob Kerrey, who is a formidable candidate in Nebraska despite a huge GOP voter registration advantage. No matter how solid Don's ideas, he isn't a proven winner, and that counts. Nebraska conservatives should realize that there are competing demands between electability and political philosophy.
Now I don't subscribe to the apocalyptic view of elections that holds each round as the most important in America's history. With that said, this is a big one. If the GOP allows a Nebraska Senate seat to slip away from its grasp, it can protest all it likes about not picking the conservative enough candidate, but that doesn't matter. We only pick these folks every six years, so when we have the opporunity to win back a major seat, let's make the proper choice.
As I said a month ago, Deb Fischer is our best option for beating Bob Kerrey in the fall:
The best choice for Nebraskans happens to have just finished up a hard-working session in your state legislature. Like the Nebraskansshe represents, she believes itâs important to finish her work. Sheâs a career mom who has experience in small business, the challenges of education and the cultural values shared by all Nebraskans. Sheâll represent âNebraska valuesâ like no other candidate in this race.
Sheâs found success because of hard work and a willingness to challenge the status quo. Sheâs the American Dream and she wants to make that dream accessible to all willing to work hard enough.
We need more candidates just like her in Washington.
Vote Deb Fischer on May 15. You wonât be disappointed.
A hardworking woman with a background not in politics but private industry and who cares about her constituents instead of acquiring fame or fortune in public office.
That's something Nebraskans value very much, and it's my final sell for Nebraska Republicans. Deb is our candidate. Give her your vote today.
The former two-term senator raked in an impressive $900,000 in the month after announcing late February his bid to replace retiring Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.). But all except $210,000 of it came from supporters outside Nebraska, including friends from New York and Washington â the latest reminder of his decade outside the Cornhusker State.
Politico calling Bob Kerrey's fundraising practices into question.
I'm guessing my preferred candidate, Deb Fischer, keeps a bit more of her fundraising near home. Having met Sen. Kerrey, I find him a nice guy. But perhaps he's been away from home a bit too long for his own good?
The best choice for Nebraskans happens to have just finished up a hard-working session in your state legislature. Like the Nebraskans she represents, she believes itâs important to finish her work. Sheâs a career mom who has experience in small business, the challenges of education and the cultural values shared by all Nebraskans. Sheâll represent âNebraska valuesâ like no other candidate in this race. Sheâs found success because of hard work and a willingness to challenge the status quo. Sheâs the American Dream and she wants to make that dream accessible to all willing to work hard enough. We need more candidates just like her in Washington. Vote Deb Fischer on May 15. You wonât be disappointed.
Doing my best rhetorical impression of the mama Grizzly.