Reviews of purebasic
#Reviews of purebasic windows
Somehow, this PB forms issue (being so complicated) is causing Before the messages start coming telling me to goīuy VB, I know there are alternatives like EZ GUI but I really wish PB had forms like VB 6ĭoes forms. You know.I am "stuck" when it comes to PB Forms.
#Reviews of purebasic windows
You are aware of the VB limits regarding forms.Īs mentioned, i like Purebasic for it's cheap and good development.īut the form and gadget stuff is way out.Įven if you can work around those, it's always running behind.īetter stick closer to windows itself is my motto.įreeware and commercial tools for PowerBASIC Nothing as bad as a bad implementation of window development. These are my 2 cents since they replied with inacurate (obsolete?) remarks. While using DDT with the windows commands gives you a more obvious way to program. PureBasic does not let you use ordinary windowstyles easily, so you are depending on what the author of purebasic will let you do. I'm equally in the position to say that in fact these controls have nmore limits due their implementation than the windows controls. The controls they mention are mostly derived from ordinary windows controls. The remark over there that PowerBASIC is only able to use plain SDK is a bit obsolete. Just wanted to say the PB/WIN has built-in commands to make windows too. I noticed this same question on the PureBasic site. please don't lock this thread, even if their are other topics on this matter, I really want the opinions of this forum for my specific situation. Also, is the price any indication of performance? Another question is about the syntax, since I am coming from VB I'm hoping to pick up either language quickly since they are both based on BASIC, and I was wondering which syntax is easier to convert to from VB (in terms of learning the new language)? And, in your opinions, what syntax is easier (PureBasic's or PowerBasic's)? I plan on posting this on both forums, so if any of you browse both, yes its me. Price is not a factor in the decision, although I gotta say you can't beat under 100$ and lifetime updates. I heard a couple people (even on PureBasic's forums) say that for now, PowerBasic is better for apps that need that last bit of speed, and are a little more rock solid (which really persuades me as it needs to be a server that can handle all the people in a speedy fashion, while still not locking up every hour). However I know that some of the most important programs are going to be servers, that need to be able to handle many many requests simultaneously (cant give a number, as I dont know how big the program will be). I plan on using which ever compiler I decide to make a variety of programs (which is why PureBasic seems interesting, because if both compilers are the same in performance yet PureBasic is including gaming functions built in.). I'll tell you some background about what I want to do with the compiler so hopefully in addition to facts you can give me an unbiased opinion on the right compiler for me, but first off is PureBasic / PowerBasic (apparently they are very similar, which is why im having difficulty deciding) faster than delphi (I heard it was favorably comparable to C++, and C++ is faster than delphi)? Currently I work with VB and I plan on buying either PureBasic or PowerBasic. Ok, I'm really sorry if this causes a flame war but I really wanted all of your opinions.














