Previously on hold, Senate Bill 50 (SB 50) is back and will be the first item of business on the California Senate floor tomorrow (Wednesday, January 29). Please call or email your representative today and tomorrow morning and press for adequate preservation safeguards to be added to the legislation.
Why Is SB 50 Bad for Historic Preservation?
SB 50 is a proposed state-wide bill that is intended to increase density and streamline the production of multi-family housing development in California. If passed, SB 50 would override local land use restrictions, allowing multi-family buildings to go up near “high quality” train and bus stops. This will also undoubtedly result in the demolition of important historic buildings and damage the livability of existing and future historic districts.
SB 50 is currently the most pressing threat to L.A.'s historic places. It poses a significant and immediate threat to older and historic neighborhoods by circumventing local planning laws, and by exempting parts of development projects from discretionary review, including some local historic districts/HPOZs.
While the intent of providing more housing may be good, we believe the bill and its approach is highly problematic as currently written. It poses a one-size-fits-all solution and a blunt, statewide fix that would outstrip local authority and planning.
As part of a statewide coalition of preservation organizations, the Conservancy is requesting amendments to SB 50 to ensure adequate preservation safeguards are added to the legislation. There were amendments to the bill's language earlier this month, but there were no substantive changes that address our outstanding preservation concerns. For this reason, the Conservancy, as part of the statewide coalition of preservation organizations, has come out in opposition of SB 50 unless amended.
Preservation and density are not mutually exclusive, or an either/or choice. We believe there can be a healthy balance with thoughtful planning. We want to ensure that the revised bill language will not impose a one-size-fits-all approach and unnecessarily harm California’s unique historic resources and neighborhoods.
If passed without adequate safeguards, this legislation threatens L.A.'s older and historic neighborhoods, and we need your help.
How You Can Help
SB 50 legislation is moving quickly. SB 50 will be the first item of business on the Senate Floor tomorrow (Wednesday, January 29), at 11 a.m.
Please contact your State Senate representative today (find your representative here) and urge them to include adequate safeguards for preservation in this bill.
Los Angeles-area senators are:
Ben Allen, Pico-Robertson to Redondo, (916) 651-4026
Bob Archuleta, Montebello to Lakewood, (916) 651-4032
Steven Bradford, Inglewood to San Pedro, (916) 651-4035
Maria Elena Durazo, East L.A. to Koreatown, (916) 651-4024
Lena A. Gonzalez, Huntington Park to Long Beach, (916) 651-4033
Robert Hertzberg, East San Fernando Valley, (916) 651-4018
Holly Mitchell, Culver City and South L.A., (916) 651-4030
Anthony J. Portantino, Burbank to Claremont, (916) 651-4025
Susan Rubio, Baldwin Park to Covina, (916) 651-4022
Henry Stern, West San Fernando Valley, (916) 651-4027
Scott Wilk, Santa Clarita to Palmdale, (916) 651-4021
This is an urgent issue, so don’t delay in getting in touch with your representative!
On Thursday, the Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee announced that Senate Bill 50 by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) will become a “two-year bill,” meaning it will not come up for a vote this year and will be eligible for a vote in January.
SB 50 creates new zoning standards for the construction of housing near job centers and public transportation, while protecting against the…
Senate Bill 50 Threatens L.A.’s Historic Neighborhoods
Senate Bill 50 (SB 50) is a proposed state-wide bill that is intended to increase density and streamline the production of multi-family housing development in California. If passed, SB 50 would override local land use restrictions, allowing multi-family buildings to go up near “high quality” train and bus stops.
While the intent of providing more housing may be good, we believe the bill and its approach is highly problematic as currently written. It poses a one-size-fits-all solution and a blunt, statewide fix that would outstrip local authority and planning.
As part of a statewide coalition of preservation organizations, the Conservancy has requested amendments to SB 50 to ensure adequate preservation safeguards are added to the legislation. Specifically, we want to ensure that the legislation would allow for a review process and exemptions. We have asked for safeguards that would protect designated historic structures and historic districts.
Preservation and density are not mutually exclusive, or an either/or choice. We believe there can be a healthy balance with thoughtful planning. We want to ensure that the revised bill language will not impose a one-size-fits-all approach and unnecessarily harm California’s unique historic resources and neighborhoods. If passed without adequate safeguards, this legislation threatens L.A.'s older and historic neighborhoods.
How You Can Help
SB 50 will go to the California Senate’s Appropriations Committee this Thursday, May 16.
Please contact your State Senate representative (find your representative here) and the members of the California State Senate Appropriations Committee and urge them to include adequate safeguards for preservation in this bill.
SB 50 is moving quickly, so don’t delay in getting in touch with your representative and the members of the committee!
Appropriations Committee
Email and/or call each of these legislators; they play a key role in the possible passage of SB 50:
Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza speaks in defense of Beyoncé :
“For me it's clear Beyoncé sees herself as a part of the movement for black lives, and believes that black lives matter — and ultimately, that's what matters. How do I know? Because in a little under five minutes, Bey told us who her people are, how that makes her who she is, and that she could care less about conspiracy theories about her man being part of the illuminati, or what you think about her daughter's natural hair.”