Human Genome Editing Scandals by Nurin Afiqah binti Abu Bakar from Times of India
WHO: A heated debate broke out between the delegates of Western Countries and Muslim-majority countries, as genome editing goes against their Muslim beliefs. Genome editing, also known as gene editing, refers to a group of technologies that give scientists the capabilities to alter an organism’s DNA. However, according to the Islamic law, these actions
are considered wrong.
“—In most developed countries, clinical genetics service was established by the end of the twentieth century. However underdeveloped countries such as Pakistan face multiple infectious diseases, malnutrition and so on and so forth. We are agreeing to use genome editing in the healthcare sector in order to save our country’s citizens. We are not against the islamic policies.” said the delegates of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, agreeing on the usage of genome editing
solely for the healthcare sector.
“—Human genome editing is a method that involves modification of the DNA cells. It is edited by adding, removing or altering the DNA in the human genome.The purpose of human genome editing by modifying is that we are able to increase our understanding of gene functions and develop ways to treat diseases. Besides, the pros’ of human genome editing, it can lead to certain type of cancer, allergy reaction or damage of the tissues of an organ, if an injection is involved. Thus, it should be handled as ethically as possible.” state the delegate of the Republic of Zimbabwe, speaking up on the pros’ and cons’ of human genome editing as a whole. “—Human genome editing should not be trusted by the public, for the catastrophe it could cause is unpredictable. How can the public assure that human genome editing would not be misused in the future for selfish desires? Another concern surrounding this issue is the increase of the existing gap between the rich and poor. Genome editing is expensive and is only accessible to the richer citizens.” Added the delegate of the People’s Republic of China. Questioning the equality of the accessibility of genome editing if it made its debut in the medical sector. The session carried on with a ten minutes unmoderated caucus, where delegates from western and muslims countries separated to create their own draft resolution regarding the issue at hand. Each delegate works in a collaborative manner to support their own stands with the issue at hand.
“—We deemed that genome editing are forbidden in our country as it is according to the Quran, it’s a sin to change God’s creation. Although an individual might be using this technology as a medical treatment, we still strictly forbid it as our country takes religion seriously.” stated the delegate of the Islamic Republic of Iran, that is strongly opposed to the usage of human genome
editing commercially.
The debate went back and forth between the countries who are in favour of human genome editing and oppose it. The debate was both on the rights, one to stand for the betterment of the
health of the general society while the other to stand firm in their beliefs.
Is the human genome practice truly beneficial in our road to advancing medical technologies or is it a wolf in sheep’s clothing waiting to shake the world with impending doom?















