i think what's so revelatory about the as-if part of the practical aesthetics handbook and the ~method(s) is that it combines abstraction with analogy and in so doing makes abstraction legible to me in a way it never is otherwise. you are not comparing a textual situation to another situation based on the literal events taking place or characters' literal relationships to one another, you are addressing the subterranean stratum, which means you have to understand what is happening abstractly. rhea seehorn is talking about the ski lodge scene from the finale & said obviously she's never had her eggs stolen by a global hivemind, but she's felt betrayed, and she's felt profoundly embarrassed for letting herself be happy / believe herself to be loved against her own instincts, only to find her instincts proved right. so it's all on the Seele-plane, it's all abstract & phenomenological, while the literal events don't have to be comparable at all. the phenomenology can still be analogous. and that makes modern naturalistic acting possible