Aug 21, 2014
Honestly it's pretty easy (relatively (haha puns)) to set up some reference frame malarkey so that three and a half seconds takes more than a year.
And that's in regular physics, special relativity section.
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from Serbia
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from Spain
seen from China
Honestly it's pretty easy (relatively (haha puns)) to set up some reference frame malarkey so that three and a half seconds takes more than a year.
And that's in regular physics, special relativity section.
lephenixnoir replied to your post:lephenixnoir replied to your post:lephenixnoir...
If you want to work on concave polygons you can split them into several convex ones. How many is up to you. But concave surfaces are the reasons behind complicated collision engines.
And therein lies the problem. These particular polygons are editable at runtime. So there's no real sure way of splitting them up into convex polygons. Or, at least, it doesn't seem like the math would be easier.
Oh well, I'll figure out something.
lephenixnoir replied to your post:lephenixnoir replied to your photo:Hi welcome to...
penalties ; compute objects position with respect to dynamic, then create repulsive force when they are entering another surface. works fast but must be tuned well to not generate abberant energy (think of twiching ragdolls)
Awww but those are some of my favorite bugs!
Ok I get what you mean now. (Unfortunately the app I'm working on doesn't have actual forces in it. It just needs boundaries, etc. So I'm here debating what's the best boundary approximation for a concave polygon and can we do that in anything close to real time with the accuracy they want.)
It would be a vast spooled thing, and they don't collapse, right?
I think they do.
It's why they don't use slinkies to hold up buildings.
meganopteryx replied to your post “Panels complete: 2/?? Non-typical angles/distances: 1/?? Obfuscated...”
Fun times. I wonder if I will work on panels tonight or just ... work. And oh yeah taxes.
Nothing is certain but sleep and taxes.
minitiate replied to your post “And with that, I’m going to play some minecraft and have an early...”
So late already? Why does time keep passing.
I'm gonna say, as a physicist who does physics, quantum.
meganopteryx replied to your post:meganopteryx replied to your post:meganopteryx...
Ok, you’re right, I made a generalization. It has no DISCERNIBLE seasons.
But it still has seasonal variation and therefore I am CORECKT.
I bet the most heartfelt confessions of Iritid love are "I charm-up-top-bottom-strange you". It's the sort of romance about which ballads are written.
I've just designed a romantic system based around hadrons.
Or at least the different types of quark.
At least this is the first time I've got Narrator confused by my explanation of something (his expertise is more biology and literary than mine, which is more physics/maths).
But really, there is no saving me, is there?