physical appearance changes r so fucking easy once u realize we're literally jus a bunch of random atoms n molecules, u jus have to stop bein logical bout it
então seu foco AINDA está no 3D, você o vê como algo que precisa mudar. você está dando poder a ele. além disso, se você só se sente bem quando o 3D está mostrando algo bom ou neutro, então você ainda é codependente do 3D para validação.
não importa o que você veja, você precisa permanecer fiel ao seu mundo interior, não apenas quando as coisas parecem certas.
why morals and logic doesn't exist on an awareness scale ?
As you know, as a shifter/manifestor, there is an infinite number of realities. Which also means, for example, that there are as many realities where eating pizza for breakfast every day is normal as there are realities where it isn’t. The same goes for when you put a cup of hot coffee in a cold room: it will always cool down until it reaches room temperature, because this is a direct consequence of the laws of thermodynamics. There are as many realities where this is logical as there are where it isn’t.
Now apply that on a bigger scale to whatever you want. This could be the biggest crime or something as small as slapping your brother because he annoys you. Keep in mind that we are everything at once, and we just choose where we are. Do you get what I mean?
If there are as many places where something is good as there are where it is bad, and knowing that you are every one of those things at once, where it is both good and bad, then it just means that there is no absolute good and no absolute bad because they balance each other out.
I know this doesn’t please everybody, but this is the truth. When I explain this to my shifter friends and see their reactions, I really understand how deep this reality logic and morality are in our minds. Obviously, it’s normal, it’s your anchor point, but you can’t judge everything based on that point.
Everything you think is logically and morally correct or wrong is just an illusion. There is not even something that is strictly bad or good; it’s just a spectrum different behaviors.
And before some of y’all say, “You’re just saying this to justify all the bad things you’ve done,” no, I’m not, because good and bad just don’t exist as absolute truths; it’s a perception, a point of view. ( i've just shifted to eat a lot and crack my s/o)
Obviously, if you are in a reality where something is considered immoral, don’t do it, because it is against the rules of that reality. Since you are in that reality, your actions are based on its rules. So now we can say that something is good or bad within that framework. But like I said, that is only within the rules of that reality. So no you can't be a racist because " morals and logic doesn't exist on an awareness scale 🤓" since what you're doing is within the rules of that reality.
i find it ridiculously hilarious how people set conditions for them to shift or manifest. setting up rules you must follow and then telling everyone else those rules are gospel is ridiculous. i’ll shift or manifest in whatever way is fun and suitable for me, success will follow regardless if i follow those so called “regulations”.
shifting and manifesting should be a practice that is fun and enjoyable, but most of all, easy for YOU. what i do may not work for you, that does not mean shifting or manifesting is not suited for you. it merely means we are different, and that’s perfectly okay.
comparing your perceived so called “failures” to another’s success is not going to do you any good, find what works for you. or don’t. who am i to tell you what to do?
Not even a blind person would cheat on me cuz thy know that im too good. It’s more possible for pigs to start flying and whales to start walking on land and start paying bills than me getting cheated on.
Enter.
(This was written in my script after Megan thee Stallion got cheated on.)
O caos NÃO antecede a criação (a não ser que você acredite nisso)
Se você passa algum tempo em redes sociais consumindo conteúdo sobre manifestação, com certeza já esbarrou na seguinte frase: "O caos antecede a criação". É aquele velho discurso de que tudo na sua vida precisa dar errado, desmoronar e virar uma bagunça para que o seu desejo finalmente se manifeste.
A verdade nua e crua? Isso é uma mentira. E o pior: é uma mentira que atrasa a vida de muita gente.
O caos só vai acontecer se você acreditar que ele precisa acontecer. Se você aceita essa ideia como uma regra, adivinha só? A sua consciência vai criar o caos apenas para confirmar que você estava "certa" sobre como a criação funciona. É a própria Lei da Suposição em ação, mas usada contra você mesma.
Neville Goddard nunca, em nenhum de seus livros, palestras ou relatos de vida, ensinou que você precisa passar por sofrimento, dor ou destruição para manifestar o que deseja.
Para Neville, a criação já está terminada. Tudo o que você deseja seja um relacionamento perfeito, dinheiro, um corpo saudável, a casa dos sonhos, já existe no "plano da consciência" agora mesmo, neste exato segundo. Você não precisa destruir o que está aí fora para que o novo apareça. Você só precisa trocar o seu estado de consciência.
Neville não falava em caos. Ele falava em Assunção. Assumir o estado do desejo realizado é um ato interno de consciência, não um ato de destruição do mundo externo.
A Lei da Suposição não tem senso de humor, não tem moralidade e não julga. Ela apenas espelha o que você assume como fato.
Se você acredita que precisa do caos na sua vida para depois ter algo bom, o seu subconsciente vai orquestrar as situações mais difíceis possíveis só para te entregar aquilo que você decretou. A culpa não é do "Universo" ou do "processo de manifestação"; a causa é a sua crença limitante de que o sucesso exige sofrimento prévio.
Tem criador de conteúdo que ganha visualização romantizando o sofrimento no processo de manifestação, dizendo que se a sua vida virou de cabeça para baixo, é um "sinal" de que o seu desejo está chegando. Não caia nessa. Você pode (e deve!) decidir as regras da sua manifestação. O processo pode ser tranquilo, leve e completamente natural.
Manifestação é uma decisão, não um processo doloroso.
Você não precisa sofrer para ter algo que você quer. Basta assumir que você já tem aquilo e persistir nessa nova identidade.
Se você não quer caos, simplesmente decrete que a sua mudança será natural e pacífica. Você não precisa de dor, não precisa de destruição e, para ser bem sincera, você não precisa nem de áudios subliminares, magias, cadernos cheios de técnicas repetitivas ou rituais exaustivos.
Tudo isso são apenas "muletas". A única coisa de que você precisa é decidir. A manifestação é instantânea a partir do momento em que você decide que já possui o que deseja na sua consciência. O 3D (o mundo físico) é apenas um espelho, ele é obrigado a refletir a sua decisão. Pronto, acabou.
Pare de comprar regras limitantes que os outros tentam te vender. A realidade é sua, as regras são suas!
i completely agree with this and i don’t understand it. is he not a pedo? like did they not do a whole investigation on him and find weird children’s photo in his house and wasn’t he paying children to sleep with him? he’s also incredibly scary looking and has like momo eyes i’m terrified of him and some of his shifters are absolutely insane i was in a server with this one mj shifter and she would send paragraphs of how much she needed him and craved him and wanted to be in his bones and i’m like are we talking about the same guy? the one that sleeps with children and looks like he’s a character from ahs? now people can do whatever they want and if you script out that weird behavior i guess it’s alright
I genuinely do not know a lot about mj, but he gives me bad vibes soley because i grew up believing he was a pedo
If you don't know the truth about someone, it's better to stay silent rather than spreading harmful misinformation. These claims about Michael Jackson have been proven false for years. Calling it an 'opinion' doesn't make it okay to lie. Please do your research instead of causing unnecessary drama.
“I look in the mirror, and I would say over and over to myself… I’d take a deep breath, put my feet together, raise myself erect, strong like a… a hero warrior, and I’d say, ‘Biggest-selling album of all time, greatest seller,’ over and over to my mind, and look in my eyes. And I’d mean it… I wouldn’t accept anything unless this was exactly what I wanted. My attitude was: I want the biggest-selling album of all times, to break records, to do phenomenal work.” — Michael Jackson.
there’s something almost unsettling about how precise that is. is it just me, or?
not dreamy, not vague, not “i hope this works out.”
it’s controlled.
a young Michael Jackson standing in front of a mirror, not just seeing himself, but rehearsing a future until it stopped feeling like a fantasy and started feeling like fact.
in 1979, at just 21, came alive MJ’s manifesto. he wrote about becoming something “magic,” about shedding the limits people had already placed on him and stepping into a version of himself that didn’t exist yet, at least not in the world everyone else could see. but to him, it already did.
and he didn’t treat it like a cute idea, rather obsessed over it, repeated it until it burned into him, writing “100 million” on mirrors so that every glance forced him to face the standard he set for himself.
with persistence like that, reality caught up.
“Thriller” didn’t just succeed, everyone knows that.. it rewrote what success even looked like. it became the best-selling album of all time, moving tens of millions of copies globally, breaking records that, decades later, are still standing.
a direct echo of something he had already decided years before.
MJ would also lie by the pool in silence, letting ideas come to him, describing it almost like tuning into something beyond himself. he spoke about asking god for inspiration, about feeling like ideas were moving through him, and if he didn’t claim them, someone else would. he even named Prince as someone he felt in quiet competition with, like creativity itself was a current you had to catch before it passed you by.
call it imagination, call it discipline, he called it magic.
he didn’t wait to believe it after it happened.
he believed it until it had no choice but to happen !!
and if MJ can do it, so can you. cue the receipts!
i think as a fandom we are glossing over bertie carvel's interviews about baelor too much. yes baelor is chivalrous and kind and a good man but he is also extremely flawed. in many interviews we get more insight about him: he likes to show off his knowledge because it makes him feel superior and fills his ego, he does things that serve his public image, his plan to go at the king's guard because they're defenseless against him, ... at the end of the day he's still a prince who grew up privileged and pampered. he's also a targaryen and we know what that means.
He is a good man but he is far from a perfect one.
A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms character analysis/rant incoming (feat. Lyonel Baratheon):
NOTE: I do not write this with hate or malice toward anyone. I just think that the way we engage with media is important and that it can worthwhile (and fun) to critically analyze both the media itself and the fandom space it cultivates.
I've really been enjoying the AKOTSK fandom since the show came out, but the way that Lyonel is commonly written and characterized by the fandom is starting to get under my skin a little.
While I believe that many AKOTSK characters are frequently mischaracterized to some extent, it seems particularly egregious with Lyonel (though that may just be my personal bias shining thorough because he is my favorite, lol).
It seems like the fandom at large has watered him down to a single character trait.
He’s been “Flanderized” into a character who likes to drink, party, and fight and who cares for little else beyond that. A lot of the fanfics I’ve read even allude to the idea that he is a poor Lord of Storm’s End because all he wants to do is drink, throw feasts, fight, and hunt. Which is interesting to me because there is SO much evidence to the contrary in the show (SPOILERS BELOW):
He is well aware of his vassal lord’s financial situation, including the way it affects the people under him.
He (allegedly) had a profound thought about the history of tourneys.
He understands that people are largely self-serving and will likely only come to him if they need something (or if they want to kill him, lol).
He realizes very quickly that Dunk is more than just his height and (correctly) surmises that Dunk will play a large role in the future.
At the same time, he recognizes that Dunk's height is an advantage—perhaps one bestowed by the gods—and encourages him to make use of it and not hide it.
He understands that overthinking things and allowing your thoughts to spiral almost always does more harm than good, and he discourages Dunk from doing it.
He knows about the last Trial of the Seven, which even Maekar (a Prince of the Realm) did not know.
He (arguably) deduces that Dunk was never actually knighted and intervenes to knight Raymun on his behalf, sparing Dunk from the admission (or, alternatively, sparing Dunk from the guilt of knighting someone when he believes he himself was never actually knighted).
He does not make a joke or a spectacle out of knighting Raymun. He is calm, serious, and solemn, which is exactly what gives that scene so much weight.
He understands how parental affection (or lack thereof) can affect a person’s character and actions.
Similarly, he is able to correctly deduce that Baelor was more well-loved by his mother than Maekar. More importantly, he has a commendable understanding of how the difference in Baelor and Maekar’s upbringing affects them each as individuals and how that—along with their personal stakes in the trial—may affect the outcome of the battle (which he ends up being correct about).
He seeks Dunk out after the trial and brings a maester to help him, knowing that Dunk does not have one of his own and also likely (correctly) deducing that Dunk was not in the right mental space to seek help himself.
He recognizes that Baelor’s choice to fight in the trial was a complex one and that it was perhaps not entirely selfless (which is an interesting and thought-provoking point whether you as a viewer personally agree or not).
He also acknowledges how Baelor’s attitude toward fighting the King’s Guard during the trial was technically an abuse of power that may have angered the gods (which, again, is a fair point to raise even if you disagree with it).
He offers Dunk a spot at Storm's End—an offer which remains even when it becomes clear to Lyonel that the two of them disagree about Baelor's sacrifice and the Targaryens.
Perhaps most critically, it is clear that he actually knows how to play the game of politics very well. As much as he dislikes the Targaryens, he understands that now is not the right time to strike. But he can see the writing on the wall, and he knows that the time is coming (which he is, again, correct about). Even more than that, he seems to be preparing for it.
Yes, he is boisterous and loud. Yes, he clearly enjoys a good feast, a good drink, and a good fight. But he is also incredibly socially aware. He is shrewd and perceptive. He is intelligent. He knows when a moment needs to be quiet and when it needs to be loud.
And it is especially frustrating to witness the way he is being mischaracterized by the fandom because he himself contradicts that characterization when he tells Dunk that “within every man there are many men.”
Of course he is going to behave differently depending upon the company and environment. The night before a tourney is a night of revelry. He is going to drink and be merry. The trial is an opportunity to fight the Targaryens and their King’s Guard without facing any consequences. He is going to enjoy it. But that is not all he does. That is not all he is.
Perhaps part of the problem is that we see relatively little of him on screen, and even when we do see him, there is little diversity in scenario. He is always either preparing for a fight or coming fresh off of one. We do not get to see him in a safe, calm, private environment; we do not get to see him when he is not being "The Laughing Storm." Additionally, we do not get to see him interact with people he truly loves (e.g. family), which we do get to see for many of the other characters. However, despite this, the existing scenes still serve to exemplify that he is a complex, multifaceted character.
Yet, many people within the fandom seem to have locked on to the same base character traits for Lyonel: raucous and hedonistic. It is becoming increasingly rare to see a portrayal of him that exists outside the confines of those traits. And even when there is an attempt to explore his character further, those traits still frequently exist as a major undercurrent, often (in my opinion) at the expense of the story and character. It is almost as if there is a fear of straying too far from the stereotype that's been formed around him.
To be clear, I enjoy the memes and the jokes. It can be comedic. But the frequency of it—the fear of straying from it—really does seem like such a bastardization of his character.
Which is terribly unfortunate because his real character is infinitely more interesting, in my opinion.
There is a weird game of telephone that often occurs within fandom spaces wherein people who have only ever consumed fan-made content start to create content themselves, despite never actually engaging with the source material (or engaging with it very minimally). While it is fantastic for the life of the fandom (and I would certainly never discourage anyone from participating in a fandom that brings them joy), I've noticed that it often leads to a dilution of the characters within the fandom as a whole. So, perhaps that is part of the problem here.
I realize that this is a relative non-issue at the end of the day. People are having fun with fictional characters. I am having fun with fictional characters (and I clearly have a current favorite, lol). I'm always happy when people enjoy something so much that it pushes them to create; even more so when they feel the desire to share their creations with others. Plus, this gripe is hardly exclusive to AKOTSK. I don't think I've ever been part of a fandom where this was not a problem to some extent; it comes with the territory. This post is more just me shouting my opinion into the void to get it off my chest. Maybe it will resonate with someone. Regardless, if you actually read through this whole thing (even if you disagree), thank you! :)
Anyway, send tweet.
Padroeira da Própria Liberdade @whoispris - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
turnnoffyourmind
kianamaiart
janainaart
dailybridgerton
izzy806
tangentwithtanner
annaxmalina
prguitarman
gummygunk
