ARTS3091 Blog

[3091blog-blog]

Blog 2 - Metacommunications

The ideas presented to us this week centred on the idea that our environment, or the objects around us, interact with and become a part of our memory. For me personally, I found this concept reminded me of a term often used in the popular TV show, the Mentalist, in which the main character will refer to a thing called the ‘memory palace’. (Can be seen here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uupd8X9DZE) The idea of the ‘memory palace’ I believe interlinks with the readings seamlessly. The idea is, one’s memory can extend almost limitlessly if we were to actively store our memories by re-creating a place in our mind which we know very well (i.e. a childhood home), we then link different parts of this place (such as a room or piece of furniture) with people or information, and when you wish to actively retrieve this information in your memory, you just think back to the place and link and you will remember. As discussed in the Stiegler and Wikipedia reading, ‘We discover then that a part of ourselves (like our memory) is outside of us,’ (Steigler, Bernard). Further, the Extended Mind Thesis (EMT) ‘proposes that some objects in the external environment are utilized by the mind in such a way that the objects can be seen as extensions of the mind itself. Specifically, the mind is seen to encompass every level of the cognitive process, which will often include the use of environmental aids,’(Wikipedia, Extended Mind Thesis). These ideas are almost exactly encompassed within the ‘memory palace’ theory, and relate perfectly to the idea of ‘active externalism’ (Clark and Chalmers, 1998). Besides this idea, I believe the theory also relates to other external triggers in a physical way, which actively jog and assist our memory on a daily basis. In regards to technology, there are many examples of this. These include the use of timers, alarms, digital diaries or planners, calendars and contacts on one’s phone and the basic archiving of information. As Chalmer’s states, ‘when parts of the environment are coupled to a cognitive system in the right way, they become parts of the mind,’ (Chalmers, David, 2009). Thus, I believe this form of archiving, is an active extension of the mind and memory in a cognitive form. Personally, because I was familiar with these concepts before, I found it easy to acquaint myself with the theories and concepts. I particularly enjoyed the readings for this reason. Shikha Jaipuriar z3375518 REFERENCES: Stiegler, Bernard (n.d.) ‘Anamnesis and Hypomnesis: Plato as the first thinker of the proletarianisation’ < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Mind > Chalmers, David (2009) ‘The Extended Mind Revisited [1/5], at Hong Kong, 2009’ accessed on 26 March 2013 via: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S149IVHhmc < http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uupd8X9DZE >

[3091blog-blog]

Blog one - Media Ecologies

“Machinic” The theory of ‘Media Ecology’ centres on the belief that technology not only influences society, but practically influences all walks of life. (‘Media Ecology’, Wikipedia) The idea of ‘media ecology,’ similar to the idea of technological determinism, was introduced by Marshall McLuhan in 1964 and later developed by Neil Postman. It is one that I find particularly interesting. Besides the fact that it provides an original opinion on social growth and personal conduct, I think it resonates perfectly with the western society of the 21st century. Being a ‘90’s kid,’ my generation was able to experience two vastly different decades, one with modern technology and one without. Although most of us had televisions, mobile phones or computers growing up, most other technological advancements seemed to be a thing of a very distant future. Fast forward 10 years and we see a social and technological change that we couldn’t have imagined in our wildest dreams. Touch screens, I-pod’s, motions sensors, voice activation, this list barely scratches the surface of how far we’ve come. Although we spent so much time without them, it seems now that if one were to misplace their mobile phone, i-pod or laptop, life itself would cease to matter. Most people these days would agree that these technologies facilitate our existence, an idea shared by Neil Postman. (‘What is Media Ecology’, Media Ecology Association) Further, ideas discussed by McLuhan are also evident in our everyday walks of life. According to McLuhan ‘technologies are extensions of human capacities,’ (‘Theoretical Frameworks’, Murphie, Andrew and Potts, John) an idea evident in the fact that every form of technology we have is developed and manufactured to address the thoughts or needs or the public. Furthermore, McLuhan discusses how technology, in all its different forms, are arranged to work in unity, rather than overtaking each other. This concept is particularly true in today’s society, as epitomized in the fact that platforms such as Skype, Facebook, Twitter or Instagram, to name a few, are constantly found pre-loaded as default in new devices such as phones or computers. This unity even goes so far as to uniting all the different platforms we use within technology, such as Facebook, YouTube, StumbleUpon and more, together on the online arena, done with the use of ‘share to’ buttons or the ability to upload things to other sites from another. The assemblage of these technologies together, creates a technological ecosystem. (‘Media Ecologies’ Fuller, Matthew, Introduction and ‘The first digital medium’ Levinson, Paul) Lastly, as a practical example of this theory, I thought of the times when I’d carry a CD player to school. Once upon a time, the CD player effectively served one function, allowing us to listen to music on the go. In today’s age however, the I-pod has managed to not only revolutionize the way we interact with music or society, but it has shaped a majority of our daily routines. This includes the use of apps, giving us a clock, calendar, diary, music player and computer all in the one device and the fact that it has effectively changed the way we associate with our surroundings. This is apparent in considering the majority of us in public, are glued to these important devices rather than partaking in real social conduct. Overall, I found this topic to be highly insightful, providing me with an idea which had never occurred to me before. It is apparent now that the vast influence that technology has over our everyday life, does in fact shape almost every aspect of our being. POSTED ON: 21/03/2013 By: Shikha Jaipuriar z3375518 References: Fuller, Matthew (2005) ‘Introduction: Media Ecologies’ in Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture Cambridge, MA; MIT Press: 1-12 Levinson, Paul (1997) ‘The First Digital Medium’ in Soft Edge; a natural history and future of the information revolution London: Routledge Media Ecology Association ‘What is Media Ecology’ < http://www.media-ecology.org/media_ecology/ > ‘Media Ecology’, Wikipedia < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_ecology > Murphie, Andrew and Potts, John (2003) ‘Theoretical Frameworks’ in Culture and Technology London: Palgrave Macmillan