Measuring hipstery on the HiBoCo Triangle
I admit to liking hipster things.
People often give me recommendations of hipstery places to go and see, however I ran into the issue where some of the recs were way off. In this one particular instance I checked into a hostel called the “Generator” in Amsterdam, which was undoubtedly hipster, but was not for me.
I thought about it, and decided what I actually like is bohemian with different size scoops of hipstery. Creating a continuum between hipster and bohemian makes sense to me to describe that. Immediately I can say, okay, but how bohemian is it on a scale from 1-10. (In the case of the generator hostel, I’d say 1/10 bohemian 10/10 hipster)
To add to the descriptiveness in my mental model, I added another point of the spectrum “Corporate”. Aka, how organized/business-oriented/luxurious is this it. I could use a less loaded adjective than corporate, but this scale if for me and people interested in the creative scene rather than in luxury.
Here is my word splash defining the three corners.
Three points of the HiBoCo Triangle
Hipster: modern, pretentious, elite, expensive, self-conscious, design-y, museum-esque, purposeful, consistent, trendy, elite
Bohemian: nick nacks, accidental, open for all, dirty, cheap, lawless, inconsistent, authentic, candid, unique
Corporate: luxurious, organized, business-oriented, rigid, new, clean, on-time
HIpster: No wifi. Talk to to each other. (or equally sassy line)
Corporate: 30 minute wifi code per purchase on receipt
Bohemian: Wifi... but it doesn’t work. Maybe charm the owner to reset the home router.
To have even more fun with this I decided to draw out San Francisco Cafes (mostly mission district) on my new HiBoCo Scale.
San Francisco Mission’s coffeeshops
In general, I don’t mind the inconsistency, and lower quality, and will trade it in for something more sincere towards the bohemian corner. All the cafes on this list I consider “on-spectrum” and I would visit them depending on what I wanted.
...this is probably excessive