Game of Thrones Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
đ
ojovivo
KIROKAZE

if i look back, i am lost
$LAYYYTER

Andulka
cherry valley forever
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Not today Justin
Claire Keane
𩵠avery cochrane đŠľ
No title available

bliss lane

#extradirty

oozey mess
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Mexico

seen from Canada
@basuramx-blog
C O N S U M E
âWhen the last tree has been cut down, the last fish caught, the last river poisoned, only then will we realize that one cannot eat money.â
Why is capitalism bad for the environment? Capitalism (and neoclassical economic theory) were developed in a world where the economy was small relative to the containing ecosystem. Therefore it made sense that the economy could grow without impacting the ecosystem. The limiting factor was man-made (i.e. labor).
Today, humans (and the things which we have produced) are not small relative to the containing ecosystem. The limiting factor is not labor, it is our natural resources. Before, increasing the number of ships would increase the amount of fish caught. But if there are no fish left, then no amount of extra ships will increase the catch size (figure from Daly, 2005).
The problem with capitalism is that it does not recognise this obvious physical conflict between the growth of the economy and the preservation of the environment.
Seguir leyendo
Burnt sewing machines in the clothing factory in Bangladesh where 112 were killed.
this is what trends bring.
[photo by abir abdullah]
The Neurological Pleasures of Fast Fashion
The Atlantic has an article today on the neurological pleasures of fast fashion. Not much new revealed here, except for the science behind what we already know â people like buying things and getting deals, and the culture of fast fashion has encouraged people to buy things they donât really need. An excerpt:Â
The researchers then showed the subject the itemâs price. The medial prefrontal cortex weighed the decision, as the insula, which processes pain, reacted to the cost. Deciding whether to buy put the brain, as the study put it, in a âhedonic competition between the immediate pleasure of acquisition and an equally immediate pain of paying.â The mindset is in line with evidence that shows happiness in shopping comes from the pursuit of goodsâfrom the sensation of wanting something.
While pleasure kicks in just from the act of looking, thereâs also pleasure in purchasing, or more specifically, in getting a bargain. The medial prefrontal cortex is the part of the brain that does whatâs essentially cost-benefit analysis. âIt seemed to be responsive not necessarily to price alone, or how much I like it, but that comparison of the two: how much I like it compared to what you charge me for it,â says Scott Rick, one of the studyâs authors, now an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Michigan.
Fast fashion perfectly feeds this neurological process. First, the clothing is incredibly cheap, which makes it easy to buy. Second, new deliveries to stores are frequent, which means customers always have something new to look at and desire. Zara stores famously gets two new shipments of clothes each week, while H&M and Forever21 get clothes daily. These brands are notorious for knocking off high-end designers, allowing the customer to get something at least superficially similar to the original at a small fraction of the cost, and theyâre priced lower than the rest of the market, making their products feel like a bargain.
[âŚ]Â
The consumption isnât by any means limited to the U.S. Women in Britain, for instance, now own four times as much clothing as they did in 1980. This glut of clothing is having effects beyond stuffing our closets. About 10.5 million tons of clothes end up in American landfills each year, and secondhand stores receive so much excess clothing that they only resell about 20 percent of it. The remainder is sent to textile recyclers, where itâs either turned into rags or fibers, or, if the quality is high enough, itâs exported and cycled through a cut throat, global, used-clothing business.
You can read the rest here.
80s nuclear waste / pollution stuff - âEvildead - Annihilation of Civilizationâ cover art by Ed Repka
This tiny estuary seahorse âalmost hoppedâ from one bit of bouncing natural debris to the next, bobbing around on a reef near Sumbawa Island, Indonesia. As a brisk surface wind picked up, the seahorse took advantage of something that offered a stable raft: a waterlogged plastic cottonbud. Finalist 2017, The Wildlife Photojournalist Award: Single Image
Photograph: Justin Hofman/2017 Wildlife Photographer of the Year
Every person absolutely needs to watch these movies. (A little warning though: Earthlings is not for the faint-heartedâŚ)
Inktober Day 16
If you really want to have kids, there are 210 million orphans in the world just waiting to be adopted.Â
Gilles Cenazandotti, âLife-Like Sculptures of Endangered Speciesâ.
Ew pt. 2
Do you keep hearing the term âfast fashionâ and wonder what it refers to? Ever wonder what impact your shopping habit has on the environment?
Turns out, fashion is the second largest polluter in the world, after oil.
Watch The life cycle of a t-shirt - Angel Chang to follow a t-shirt from cotton fields to the shopping mall into your washing machine - and then, maybe, rethink your shopping habits?
Animation by TED-Ed