The ever-elusive equalization
When I first began recording, I had no idea of how and why one would process their signal. I always assumed that the great recordings I heard coming out of my headphones sounded exactly the same as the performances going in.
However, like most art, especially performance art, it is all a smoke and mirror games.
Equalization (shortened to EQ) as defined by www.Wikipedia.org is, "the process of adjusting the balance between frequency components within an electric signal." In laymen’s terms: EQing is about removing the “bad” sounding frequencies and accentuating the “good” sounding frequencies.
Remember though, the definition uses the phrase: “adjusting the balance”. Always keep this in mind… EQing isn’t about boosting the bass on every track because you like a big bass. And it definitely shouldn’t look anything like this:
When mixing, you are looking for an even balance of frequencies. Just like editing a photograph while paying attention to its histogram (a graphic representation of the color response/balance), you should edit music while paying attention to its frequency response/balance.
No two timbres should ever be fighting for a frequency.
I try to practice what it known as “subtractive EQ”. Instead of boosting the frequencies, I subtract (or cut) the frequencies that don’t sound “good”. This technique is extremely helpful in removing unwanted background or electrical noise. If done right, the listener won't even know you did anything at all.
Another useful technique stemming from EQ is the range of manipulation one can have when cutting frequencies.
For example, to achieve that vintage speaker sound you have to take into consideration the technical limitations of vintage speaker. They couldn’t replicate the 20hz-20khz hearing ability of the human ear, so you would simply cut the low and high frequencies until you get a recognizable loss of quality. After that, add some distortion to the voice with some 1.5khz.












