here's another idea
nondisabled people offering labor and transportation to disabled people so we can get together. make yourself available to us.

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Janaina Medeiros
đȘŒ
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
$LAYYYTER
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Stranger Things

No title available
will byers stan first human second
Show & Tell
styofa doing anything
Three Goblin Art

pixel skylines
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Israel
seen from Italy

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Japan
@billierain
here's another idea
nondisabled people offering labor and transportation to disabled people so we can get together. make yourself available to us.
an idea for activists
seek out people who are disabled and ask us what we think needs to happen. bring us home cooked food and interview us about our lives and our visions for activism. visit folks in institutions and ask about solutions.
seek out folks who are isolated and come to us. we are right here. in our houses, institutions, and on the street. why keep expecting us to come to you? why expect us to travel and visit the enabled world when we all know it is designed to keep us out?
what do you think might change about your activism if you made a point to support and listen to the most isolated?
almost 3,000 notes and no one has reached out to me. just saying.
open a window
noise insecures shelter walls
of lines snaking hours
this soaking weakens all fabric
these families been stretched out of touch
absorption corrupts its matter
itâs all matter of time
the bust of it full
some of us donât do well in crowds
sanctioned addictions withdraw bridges
mouths moats of poverty dentistry
some of us lost stability before
and been stormed looted evacuated
overtimed bodies deeply weary
hope fed on and fed upon mercy
now flood and the horizon fire
i been a crisis floating
a climate forming
mercy
who become essentials now
what turns to salt anyway
who isnât out here stranded
                   suheir hammad
The far end of a continuum that aims to break the will of a child and allows the expression of displaced rage toward the powerless is the practice of ritual abuse. Here, abuse is systematically rather than randomly applied. Ritual abuse is not an unheard-of perversity. Everything found in ritual abuse collectively (physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, incest, sadistic violence, murder, drugs, deception, manipulation, conditioning based on punishment, and unbridled veneration of power) is known to occur independently in our society.
Chrystine Oksana, Safe Passage to Healing: A Guide for Survivors of Ritual Abuse
transcript: People with Disabilitites in Partner Relationships. Targets Disability with Physical and Sexual Abuse. Segment 1. Coercion and Threats. Threatens to leave or to take children. Says will kill partner, pets or service animals. Threatens to have partner arrested or institutionalised. Forces use of alcohol or drugs on addicted partner. Makes parner steal or buy drugs. Segment 2. Withold Support or Treatment. Steals or throws away medication. Doesn't provide medicine or support when needed. Doesn't allow needed medical treatment. To increase dependence, breaks or does not let partner use assistive devices (phone, wheelchair, cane, walker, etc.) Segment 3. Emotional Abuse. Insults and shames about disability. Gives confliction messages by both helping and hurting. Sneaks up to startle. Abuses more as partner becomes independent. Drives dangerously to scare. Disrespects boundaries. Talks down to partner. Tormnets by not letting partner sleep. Segment 4. Isolation. Pressures to give up disability services. Confines and restrains to restrict access to others. Exposes disability (AIDS, mental illness, etc.) to others to isolate. Limits contact with others. Threatens friends. Says no one else cares. Segment 5. Minimise, Deny and Blame. Lies about abuse to others (says partner is crazy, fell out of wheelcahir, is forgetful, just didn't take medications) Blames disability for abuse. Twists reality, says abuse did not happen. Segment 6. Sexual abuse. Forces sex when partner is unable to physically resist. Humiliates sexually because of disability. Makes decisions about birth control/pregnancy. Cheats and lies (does not think partner will know because of disability.) Pressures partner into prostitution. Segment 7. Economic abuse. Controls all money. Uses partner's disability income for self. Does not share expenses because being partner to person with disability is a "favor". Does not allow partner to work and be economically independent. Segment 8. Privilege (Ableism) Overprotects. Makes decisions alone. Creates physical barriers to getting around (moves furniture, leave clutter.) Keeps tabs on parnter for "safety" reasons because of disability. Takes over tasks to make partner more dependent. In the centre are the words "Power and Control" Outside of the circle chart are the following Created by SafePlace with in-depth input from people with disabilities. Adapted with permission from Domestic Abuse Intervention Project 202 Ease Superior Street Duluth MN 55802 218.722.2781 www.theduluthmodel.org [email protected] www.SafePlace.org Austin Texas 24 hour hotline 512 267 SAFE (7233) or 512 967 9616 TTY for the deaf community.
A LIFE LIVED, DELIBERATELY Welcome, students of Evergreen, and thank you for this invitation. On the MOVE. Long live John Africa. I feel privileged to address your chosen theme, not because I'm some kind of avatar, but because a life lived deliberately has been the example of people I admire and respect, such as Malcolm X; Dr. Huey P. Newton, founder of the Black Panther Party; like Ramona Africa, who survived the hellish bombing by police of May 13, 1985; or the MOVE Nine, committed rebels now encaged for up to 100 years in Pennsylvania hellholes despite their innocence, solely for their adherence to the teachings of John Africa. These people, although of quite diverse beliefs, ideologies, and lifestyles, shared something in common: a commitment to revolution and a determination to live that commitment deliberately in the face of staggering state repression. No doubt some of you are disconcerted by my use of the term "revolution." It's telling that people who claim with pride to be proud Americans would disclaim the very process that made such a nationality possible, even if it was a bourgeois revolution. Why was it right for people to revolt against the British because of "taxation without representation," and somehow wrong for truly unrepresented Africans in America to revolt against America? For any oppressed people, revolution, according to the Declaration of Independence, is a right. Malcolm X, although now widely acclaimed as a Black nationalist martyr, was vilified at the time of his assassination by Time magazine as "an unashamed demagogue" who "was a disaster to the civil rights movement." The New York Times would describe him as a "twisted man" who used his brains and oratorical skills for "an evil purpose." Today, there are schools named for him, and recently a postage stamp was even issued in his honor. Dr. Huey P. Newton, PhD, founded the Black Panther Party in October of 1966 and created one of the most militant, principled organizations American Blacks had ever seen. J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI targeted the party, using every foul and underhanded method they could conceive of to neutralize the group, which they described as the "number one threat to national security." Sister Ramona Africa of the MOVE organization survived one of the most remarkable bombings in American history, one where Philadelphia police massacred eleven men, women, and children living in the MOVE house and destroyed some 61 homes in the vicinity. She did seven years in the state prison on riot charges, came out, and began doing all she could to spread the teachings of John Africa, the teachings of revolution, and to free her imprisoned brothers and sisters of MOVE from their repressive century in hellish prison cells. These people dared to dissent, dared to speak out, dared to reject the status quo by becoming rebels against it. They lived--and some of them continue to live--lives of deliberate will, of willed resistance to a system that is killing us. Remember them. Honor their highest moments. Learn from them. Are these not lives lived deliberately? This system's greatest fear has been that folks like you, young people, people who have begun to critically examine the world around them, some perhaps for the first time, people who have yet to have the spark of life snuffed out, will do just that: learn from those lives, be inspired, and then live lives of opposition to the deadening status quo. Let me give you an example. A young woman walks into a courtroom, one situated in the cradle of American democracy--that's Philadelphia--to do some research for a law class. This woman, who dreams of becoming a lawyer, sits down and watches the court proceedings and is stunned by what she sees. She sees defendants prevented from defending themselves, manhandled in court, and cops lying on the stand with abandon. She saw the judge as nothing more than an administrator of injustice and saw U.S. law as an illusion. Her mind reeled, as she said to herself, "They can't do that," as her eyes saw them doing whatever they wanted to. Well, that young woman is now known as Ramona Africa, who lived her life deliberately after attending several sessions of the MOVE trial in Philadelphia. After that farce she knew she could never be a part of the legal system that allowed it, and she found more truth in the teachings of John Africa than she ever could in the law books which promised a kind of justice that was foreign to the courtrooms she had seen. The contrast between America's lofty promises and the truth of its legal repression inspired her to be a revolutionary, one that America has tried to bomb into oblivion. What is the difference between Ramona Africa and you? Absolutely nothing, except she made that choice. Similarly, Huey Newton studied U.S. law with close attention when he was a student at Merritt Junior College in west Oakland, California. His studies convinced him that the laws must be changed, and the famous Black Panther Party ten-point program and platform proves, then and now, that serious problems still face the nation's Black communities, such as all the predominantly white juries still sending Blacks to prison, and cops still treating Black life as a cheap commodity. Witness the recent Bronx execution of Ghanaian immigrant Amadou Diallo, where cops fired 41 shots at an unarmed man in the doorway of his own apartment building. Huey, at least in his earlier years, lived his life deliberately and set the mark as a revolutionary. What was the difference between Huey Newton and you? Absolutely nothing, except he made the choice. Each of the MOVE Nine--including the late Merle Africa, who died under somewhat questionable circumstances after nineteen years into an unjust prison sentence--members of the MOVE organization whose trial initially attracted the attention of a young law student named Ramona decades ago, was a person who came to question their lives as lived in the system. Some were U.S. Marines, some were petty criminals, some were carpenters, but all came to the point of questioning the status quo, deeply, honestly, and completely--irrevocably. One by one, they turned their back on a system that they knew couldn't care less if they lived or died and joined a revolution after being exposed to the stirring teachings of John Africa. They individually chose to live life deliberately and joined MOVE. And although they are individuals--Delbert Africa, Janet Africa, Phil Africa, Janine Africa, Chuckie Africa, Mike Africa, Debbie Africa, and Eddie Africa--they are also united as MOVE members, united in heart and soul. What's the difference between the MOVE Nine and you? Absolutely nothing, except they made the choice. Now, unless I miss my guess, Evergreen is not a predominantly Black institution, and my choices heretofore given may seem somewhat strange to too many of you, for far too many of you may identify yourselves by the fictional label of "white." In truth, as I'm sure many of you know, race is a social construct. That said, it is still a social reality formed by our histories and our cultures. For those of you still bound by such realities however, I have some names for you like John Brown, like Dr. Alan Berkman, Susan Rosenberg, Sue Africa, Marilyn Buck, for examples. Each of these people are or were known in America as white. They are all people I know of, who I admire, love, and respect. They all are or were revolutionaries. John Brown's courageous band's attack on Harper's Ferry was one deeply religious man's strike against the hated slavery system and was indeed considered one of the opening salvos of the U.S. Civil War. Dr. Alan Berkman, Susan Rosenberg, and Marilyn Buck were all anti-imperialists who fought to free Black revolutionary Assata Shakur from an unjust and cruel bondage. They are the spiritual grandsons and granddaughters of John Brown. Dr. Alan Berkman, Marilyn Buck, and Susan Rosenberg were treated like virtual traitors to white supremacy and thrown into American dungeons. Buck and Rosenberg remain so imprisoned today. They lived lives deliberately and chose liberation as their goals, understanding that our freedom is interconnected. They chose the hard road of revolution, yet they chose. And but for that choice they are just like each of you seated here tonight, people who saw the evils of the system and resolved to fight it. Period. Now, the name Sue Africa may not be known to you. She's what you may call white. Yet when she joined the MOVE organization, the system attacked her bitterly for what was seen as a betrayal of her white-skinned privilege. On May 13, 1985 she lost her only son because the Philadelphia police bombed the house she was living in. She served over a decade in prison where the guards vilely taunted her in the hours and days after the bombing. When she came out, she went right to work to rebuild the MOVE organization in Philadelphia. She lives her life deliberately by promoting John Africa's revolution each and every day. Except for that choice, she's just like you. Now, some of you are sure to be wondering, "Well, if this guy's gig is with revolutionaries, why is he saying this to us?" The answer of course is "Why not?" OK, I know you ain't supposed to answer a question with a question, but do I expect you guys and gals who've just received your degrees to chuck it all for so nebulous a concept as revolution? Nope. I ain't that dumb. The great historians Will and Ariel Durant teach us that history in the large is the conflict of minorities. The majority applauds the victor and supplies the human material of social experiment. Now, I take that to mean that social movements are begun by relatively small numbers of people who, as catalysts, inspire, provoke, and move larger numbers to see and share their vision. Social movements can then become social forces that expand our perspectives, open up new social possibilities, and create the consciousness for change. To begin this process, we must first sense that (1) the status quo is wrong, and (2) the existing order is not amenable to real, meaningful, and substantive transformation. Out of the many here assembled, it is the heart of he or she that I seek who looks at a life of vapid materialism, of capitalist excess, and finds it simply intolerable. It may be 100 of you, or 50, or even ten, or even one of you who makes that choice. I'm here to honor and applaud that choice and to warn you that, though the suffering may indeed be great, it is nothing to the joy of doing the right thing. Malcolm, Dr. Huey P. Newton, Ramona Africa, the MOVE Nine, Dr. Alan Berkman, Susan Rosenberg, John Brown, Susan Africa, Marilyn Buck, Geronimo ji Jaga, Leonard Peltier, Angela Davis, and others, all of them people just like you, felt compelled to change the conditions they found intolerable. I urge you to join that noble tradition. I thank you all, and wish you well. On the MOVE. Long live John Africa. From Death Row, this is Mumia Abu-Jamal. The Evergreen State College, 1999 https://youtu.be/RK7AoOcI-sM
I love the stars. Because they can't say anything. I love the stars. Because they do not judge anyone.
Natsuki Takaya
resources for partners of trauma survivors
my friend just asked me for these so i thought i'd share what i sent them with everybody. allies in healing: when the person you love is a survivor of child sexual abuse by laura davis outgrowing the pain together by eliana gil trust after trauma: a guide to relationships for survivors and those who love them by aphrodite matsakis loving a trauma survivor: understanding childhood traumaâs impact on relationships http://brickelandassociates.com/trauma-survivor-relationships/ trauma survivors in love http://www.vanissar.com/blog/trauma-survivors-in-love-part-1-of-3/ loving a survivor of trauma: pray, embrace, give space huffpost.com/us/entry/9206102
my chronic illness bill of rights
I HAVE THE RIGHTâŠ
to the full range of emotional responses to my experiencesâfrom self-pity to gratitude and everything in between.
to seek out information and advice from any source i can find.
to follow or disregard any advice or recommendations i receive from strangers, friends and family, fellow sickos, books, or health practitioners.
to seek relief or a cure, or not, as i see fit.
to healthcare, including face-to-face visits with allopathic and alternative practitioners, prescriptions and supplements, assistive devices, fitness classes, and access to the information i need to make informed decisions about the potential risks and benefits of whatever i pursue.
to any accommodations i need in order to have the option of participation in the public life of my community and the larger society.
to define my level of availability to others based on how i feel and my assessment of my needs.
to make plans and commitments with the understanding that i may be too sick to follow through on them.
to address conflicts and disagreements in ways that honor the delicate relationship between stress and my well-being.
to not be compared, favorably or unfavorably, with others who share any or all of my diagnoses.
not to have to answer the question, âhow are you?â
to be appreciated for the contributions i make to my communities, even just by my presence.
to be valued for who i am, not what i do.
written by me, billie rain
original post
âA cat has absolute emotional honesty: human beings, for one reason or another, may hide their feelings, but a cat does not.â â Ernest Hemingway
Beauty is life when life unveils her holy face. But you are life and you are the veil. Beauty is eternity gazing at itself in a mirror. But you are eternity and you are the mirror.
Khalil Gibran
if your abusers were actually interested in their own rehabilitation, they could do it without your help; if they wanted to stop being abusive, if they wanted you safe, theyâd want you away from them, where you could no longer be hurt.
dont think that abusers canât exploit language of accountability and healing to further their own abuse.
Domestic Violence Resources for Muslims
Unfortunately, resources for Muslims experiencing abuse seem to be few and far between, so Iâll post what I can find here and keep adding to the post as new resources come up. These websites look helpful but as a non-Muslim I canât say for sure, so feedback would be wonderful.Â
TheAmericanMuslim.org
WiseMuslimWomen.org
MentalHealth4Muslims.com
MuslimMatters.org
ProjectSakinah.org
PeacefulFamilies.org
Muslim Women Support Centre
Defining Abuse
One of the biggest issues I see in survivor circles and on tumblr generally is how to define abuse. The fact that people care about this and want to share things like bullet point lists of what abuse is and is not is very encouraging, but unfortunately, the question is too complex to be summarized in this way and these lists, posted without context, are potentially damaging. Victims who have engaged in âabusiveâ behaviour such as walking away from a fight (for their own safety) may wonder if theyâre actually the perpetrator in the relationship, while perpetrators can use these decontextualized lists to accuse their victims of abuse or try to claim that the victim is âjust as guiltyâ as they are, furthering their own control over their victims.Â
If we take a list of abusive behaviours, such as the one I wrote on this blog a while ago now (click here to view it) without placing it in its proper context, we could conclude that almost every single human being on the planet is an abuser. Obviously, this is not the case.
Lists are very helpful in that they assist people in identifying the warning signs of abuse and understand what is and is not acceptable behaviour. Used for their purpose - as one source of information for people questioning whether theyâre being victimized - theyâre very useful. Misappropriated to any situation, however, they can be counterproductive and even destructive.
With this in mind, Iâve written this post to hopefully provide some much needed context to go with those lists youâve probably seen on your dash and on this blog as well.Â
When we talk about abuse, weâre often using two definitions that can overlap. The two types of abuse often discussed are; interpersonal abuse, and abusive behaviour. These two very similar terms are often related but not interchangeable.Â
Interpersonal abuse can be understood as a pervasive pattern of control, achieved through mistreatment and harm, committed by one person over another person, in a relationship of any kind. Intimate partners, parent and child, between siblings, boss and coworker, between friends, any relationship can be abusive. Abusive behaviour, on the other hand, is similar to mistreatment; itâs behaviour that can potentially harm another person, regardless of the relationship of the people involved. This term is used to describe specific behaviour while interpersonal abuse describes a pattern of behaviour and control.Â
An individual can engage in an abusive behaviour without being an âabuserâ in the sense that we generally understand the term. At the same time, an individual can be an abuser without ever committing any actions that we generally understand to be abusive. To make things even more complicated - and this is where a lot of people get confused, this confusion making up at least 75% of the questions I receive - there are behaviours that are clearly unkind or hurtful, but that are not by themselves abusive behaviours.Â
Clearly, identifying abuse isnât always clear cut, but these examples may help;
If youâre walking down the street and a stranger shouts obscenities and threats at you as you move past them, that person is engaging in abusive behaviour. This behaviour, while deplorable, isnât part of a pervasive pattern of control, such as what we see in family and domestic violence.
If you have an argument with your partner and they refuse to speak to you (aka give you the âsilent treatmentâ) this is clearly a hurtful and counterproductive behaviour, but this alone is not an abusive behaviour, nor does it indicate that your partner is an abuser. At the same time, this behaviour can be part of a wider pattern of abuse and control, in which case, it becomes abusive. At the same time, a victim of abuse may (rightfully) not want to interact with their abusive partner, this does not make them abusive.Â
If youâre in a safe, healthy relationship with your partner and they call you a nasty name, your partner is engaging in an abusive behaviour. This may be part of a wider pattern of mistreatment and control (even if you havenât noticed/realized yet), or it could be an isolated abusive action. To be clear, this behaviour is completely unacceptable regardless of whether itâs part of an abusive dynamic or not, and isolated incidents of abusive behaviour are often the start of an abusive dynamic, that is, interpersonal abuse.
If your partner starts calling you names more and more often and getting angry with you over small things, blaming you for their mistakes, and generally behaving in ways that make you feel unsafe and as if youâre walking on eggshells trying not to set them off, they are engaging in interpersonal abuse as well specific abusive behaviours. Their hurtful behaviour has become part of a pattern of behaviour and they have cultivated a dynamic where you feel afraid of them. This is a hallmark of abusive behaviour.
Identifying abuse becomes even more difficult when victims have a tendency to overstate their bad behaviour and abusers tend to understate their own. This can lead to victims taking responsibility for issues they did not cause/create, and abusers using the victimâs feelings of guilt to deflect responsibility from themselves. Also, abusers tend to be in a position of power over the victim, which enables them to continue their mistreatment. In addition to the above, a few things that may help when trying to work out whatâs going on a situation where you suspect abuse is taking place
Power; an individual with institutional power is more able to abuse someone with less power than the other way around, e.g. many bosses abuse their staff, but itâs uncommon for staff to abuse their bosses. This also applies to oppression in society; marginalized people generally lack the power to abuse those who oppress them, though this becomes more complex when we consider that power operates along many axes, and that axes of oppression are not quantifiable nor do they âcancel each other outâ.Â
Social capital; this ties in with power (in the end, everything does) but its worth discussing on its own as well because its one of the most central factors when abuse of any kind occurs in community spaces, friend groups and even families. Those who are well liked, who have the most allies, who are able to manipulate others (whether those around them recognize it or not, and they usually donâât) are able to perpetrate abuse and orchestrate entire groups to abuse, marginalize, and exclude the victim. Victims often vanish from a community/friend group/family without a trace in an attempt to escape, and the abuse often continues even after they do. Unfortunately, there hasnât been the kind of work done about group dynamics of abuse as there has about interpersonal abuse so we donât have a framework for it, but I would suggest considering who was forced out and under what circumstances. Severe and persistent mental illness, trauma, learning disorders such as autism and ADHD, and refusal to accept what the group considers to be fundamental truths or follow their agenda are all common reasons people whoâve experienced this kind of community abuse have described.Â
Who seems rational vs who seems âcrazyâ; abusers are very good at being calm in front of others, even when they claim their violence is caused by a loss of control. By contrast, victims are often traumatized, overreacting, or âhystericalâ due to the abuse theyâve been subjected to. The victims reactions to the abuse theyâre subjected to are routinely used against them; theyâre called hysterical, crazy, divisive, unstable, even dangerous. Strong feelings are framed as being innately abusive, regardless of what theyâre in response to or how theyâre expressed. Itâs often this person whoâs the victim, and the calm, collected person whoâs abusing them.
The âthere are two sides to every storyâ claim; this is a favourite of abusers because it enables them to posit that their abuse is the same as the victims attempts to survive their violence, and to claim that both parties are in the wrong. At the same time, victims may justify the abuserâs behaviour by explaining that they did something wrong too, but thereâs a difference between doing something counterproductive or even hurtful, and being abusive. For example, a victim may say âmy partner hit me but I did tell them they were useless firstâ. In that case, theyâre using a bad but non-abusive behaviour (calling their partner useless) to justify their partnerâs abusive behaviour (hitting them). At the same time, an abuser may use a similar method to excuse their own actions, e.g. an abuser may say âI know I shouldnât have hit my partner but they got in my face and called me useless, and I snappedâ. In this case, theyâre using their partners bad (but not abusive) behaviour to justify their own abusive behaviour. To be clear, calling someone useless can certainly be part of a pattern of abuse, my point is that the situation surrounding it needs to be taken into account (this would be an example of a behaviour that can be abusive but is not inherently abusive by itself)
Who is in control; again this ties into power but itâs worth looking at on its own. This may be difficult to deduce from the outside but the core of abuse as a pattern of control is power over another person. The person who has little to no support, who is constantly changing their behaviour to keep the other person happy, who is constantly told theyâre not good enough, who is told that their feelings are wrong, who is being coerced into doing things they donât want to do, who is being taken advantage of, this person is virtually always the victim.Â
I hope this helps to add some much needed context to list-format posts that imply that anyone who commits any behaviour on an abusive behaviour list is a perpetrator.Â
To sum up, since this is a long post; abusive behaviour (actions that are violent/harmful by themselves) is different to interpersonal abuse (a pervasive pattern of harm and control by one person over another). A lot of confusion arises when people discussing abuse are using different definitions. Most people will engage in a potentially abusive behaviour at some point in their lives, but that doesnât make them abusers or abusive; many potentially abusive behaviours are not abuse on their own but can become abusive as a wider pattern of harm and control. On the other hand, some behaviours are always abusive even if they only occur once. Finally, victims may engage in what is labelled as abusive behaviour while trying to cope with the mistreatment and violence theyâre experiencing, this does not make them abusers themselves. Abuse cannot be understood as a list of behaviour, context is extremely important.
I recently found my âgoldâ hammer after misplacing it. Itâs my favorite tool ever because it looks like a regular hammer trying to be fancy,
but then you twist both halves and unscrew it to find a flat-head screwdriver in the middle.
BUT, if you twist the very end and unscrew that
you find a phillips screwdriver.
BUT DONâT THINK THATâS ALL THERE IS! THEREâS MORE!! unscrew the very end again to find a smaller flat-head screwdriver!
BUT THATâS STILL NOT THE END!!
unscrew the end of this screwdriver to find a final, teeny tiny, flat-head screwdriver
look at how cute it is!
itâs like a matryoshka doll of tools.
Okay i just saw on the news a biker group B.A.C.A (bikers against child abuse) are guarding the house of a young girl who was assaulted,since the abuser escaped from a medical evaluation center.They are staying out there until the person is found,and if that isnt the most badass thing in the world i dont know what is. I love seeing bikers on the news for stuff like this.
selfies for visibility as a mixed race mizrahi isolated disabled crazy survivor femme. đđ - billie rain