Propelling History Forward
“I want to eliminate this era,” Dread Scott declared in opening his talk at the RISD Auditorium last Friday (April 21). Invited to campus by the Center for Student Involvement, RISD’s Black Artists & Designers (BAAD) and the Brown University Center for Public Humanities and Cultural Heritage, the guest speaker discussed three decades of making “revolutionary art to propel history forward” and encouraged students to channel their outrage over current national and global affairs into their creative practices. “I actually do have hope for the future,” he insisted – “but the hope comes from confronting the horrific present.”
Scott spoke about how reactions to his 1988 work What is the Proper Way to Display a US Flag? continue to motivate him. Made while the artist was an undergrad at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, the installation sparked such furor that President George HW Bush called it “disgraceful” and the US Senate voted to outlaw public placement of the flag on the floor or ground. “‘The flag and the artist, hang them both high,’” he recalled protestors chanting outside the Institute at the height of the controversy.
Since then Scott has based his career on “looking at how the past sets the stage for the present – and how it exists in the present in a new form” through works like On the Impossibility of Freedom in a Country Founded on Slavery and Genocide (above). Staged in NYC in 2014, the performance piece involves the artist walking into the stream of high-pressure fire hoses, uniting the struggle of Civil Rights-era activists against racial discrimination with the Ferguson, MO, protests against police brutality.
“To make the new, we need to get beyond the old,” Scott said of works like Burning the US Constitution (2011), which exemplify how he uses art to confront history.
During the Q+A that followed, he urged students to aspire to be “emancipators of humanity” – especially while “the orange Voldemort” is in the White House. “This is a pivotal era and what people do in it is going to matter,” he said (while also acknowledging how digital surveillance makes protest art an increasingly risky activity). “My shield as an artist might soon become a liability,” he admitted, “but I have an obligation.”