Once we decided that our Imagine RIT Exhibit would shift from focusing on libraries to the discovery process, we then had to tackle planning everything we would need to design and construct to the last detail. Easy right?
After further research we pushed to examine different types of learning styles. We found that the libraries we visited not only had books, but other assets such as audio books or puzzles. This variance of assets showed that librarians understood that their patrons learned differently. While an individual prefers logical, mathematical schools of thought, others could be inclined toward a more physical, artistic style. This does not mean that one individual is smarter than the other.. Everyone learned differently. This is an aspect of the human discovery process we needed to tap into. Â
We broke our ideation down to nine core learning styles/intelligences.
Naturalist: Sensitivity to other features of the natural world
Musical: The capacity to discern pitch, rhythm, timbre and tone
Linguistic: The ability to think in words and to use language to express and appreciate complex meanings
Existential: The capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence
Interpersonal: The ability to understand and interact effectively with others
Intrapersonal: The capacity to understand oneself and one’s thoughts and feelings, and to use such knowledge in planning and directing one’s life
Logical: The ability to calculate, quantify, consider propositions and hypotheses, and carry out complete mathematical operations
Bodily-Kinesthetic: The capacity to manipulate objects and use a variety of physical skills
Spatial: The ability to think in three dimensions
Following that, we used a generous amount of sticky notes to generate activities our audience could experience during the exhibition. For instance, a puzzle or maze would be perfectly suited for someone with a preference toward spatial intelligence.
Ultimately, we needed to remove Musical, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal and Existential from our list. This decision was made not because we thought these examples any less important than the other intelligences, but with our limited resources, we found they would not be suitable for a low budget and low tech exhibition.