This is a place for me to put up my readings about the British Royal Family and anything else that catches my attention. I do not do personal readings (sorry!), nor do I do readings on celebrities. Please don’t message me asking me to read on celebrity x or on a personal situation, as I will be unable to do so. However, please do feel free to message me to ask for clarification on one of my readings or to discuss them. If you like to troll or send hate, be warned that your message will be deleted and the sender will be blocked without notice. If you don’t like what I have to say, do the mature thing and simply scroll on by to another blog. Otherwise, welcome to my blog. I hope you enjoy what you read here.
About Accuracy In Readings
When you read the tarot, you are reading the energies at a set time, in a certain place, for a set person. The results you get depend on both those energies and your interpretation of the cards.
Anyone can misinterpret their cards, for a variety of reasons (internal bias, tired, cold, hungry, not aware of all the facts around a situation, etc). This happens, and it can happen to anyone. No-one is immune from making mistakes.
In addition, energies change. The situation as you read on it may not be the same the next day, the next week, the next month, and so on. People change. Events happen. Perspectives change. We all have free will, and we utilise it. At any time the actions of ourselves and/or others can change a situation. Given this fluctuation of energies, the results of a tarot reading are true for the time it is read (barring any mistakes by the reader). They may not be true one day/week/month/year into the future. Similarly, due to the exercise of free will and the resulting fluctuations of energy, any future readings may show a different result to the initial reading.
Please bear this in mind as you read the interpretations below. They are for entertainment and speculation only. Nothing is set in stone until it becomes the past (and even that is subject to interpretation). The future is always in flux.
About My Deck
I use the original Mythic Tarot deck by Juliet Sharman-Burke and Liz Greene. The beautiful illustrations on the cards are by Tricia Newell. There is a revised version of this deck currently on the market, The New Mythic Tarot, where the cards are illustrated by a new artist (same pictures, different drawing style). I don’t know if the original one is still available to purchase.
Other Social Media
I don’t have any other social media, so no Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube or anything like that. This is it.
Free Avatars
For anyone who wants them. They are all very simple, and they are all made by me.
My glasses broke (the bridge snapped when I was cleaning them - I have no idea how). I am blind as a bat without them (for example, I walk through rooms relying on my memory to tell me where the furniture is and not my sight).
I have another (older) pair I can use to get around, but they cause eye strain, so I am restricted to only strictly necessary screen time at the moment (like emails and texts).
I could scream with frustration. There is so much that I want to read on and comment on here, and I am once again unable to do so.
I am seeing the optometrist this weekend, and then there is the wait for the glasses to come in, and then I can see again (I have a 'unique' prescription and I can't use off the rack glasses/ standard reading glasses - they are not strong enough and they don't correct all the vision flaws).
I will return when I can see without eyestrain, if I don't spontaneously combust from frustration first.
I feel like the universe is conspiring against me to keep me off here, but I know it is merely an unfortunate series of events.
I am sorry, but I am absolutely drained at the moment and need lots of rest. At the moment I can do a reading or answer asks, not both, and I can't be on every day. I will be back next week to answer asks and hopefully I will feel more energetic then.
Question: How will the trip to the US go for King Charles?
This is a one card reading
I am revisiting this question in a different form to see if I can pull more information from the cards.
READING ONE
Card Drawn: The Knight of Swords in Reverse
Knights are cards of action, and in the reverse action is stymied, or no action can be taken. The first energy I get from this card is that The King is going to want to do something and he won't be able to. He will be forced into inaction, either because there is nothing he can do about the situation or because taking action will make the situation worse than it already is.
In the reverse, the Knight of Swords represents someone who is rude, tactless, a bully, ruthless, and arrogant. This could represent Harry, and The King could find himself with a situation caused by Harry or revolving around Harry in some way, where he wants to take action but is unable to do so for reasons of legality or politeness or simply not knowing what is the best thing to do. If not Harry, this could be another person with those characteristics to whom The King is forced to be polite, or a situation with a heavy power imbalance where The King can not do anything except smile and be polite.
The Knight of Swords in Reverse can also represent misguided action, or action without any sort of direction, so acting in a manner that is rash, impatient or impulsive. Again, this could be Harry doing some stunt to get attention, or it could be a situation where The King is faced with rash or impulsive behaviour and he can't do anything to stop it or fix it.
It could also be a situation where The King is prevented from undertaking something that he wants to do, such as him being forced to withdraw from the trip due to health reasons.
Underlying Energy: Wheel of Fortune in reverse
The Wheel of Fortune in reverse is bad fortune, delays, unwelcome changes, and losing control or not having any control over the situation.
The energy from this card is of bad luck, bad fortune, not being able to do what you wanted to do.
Things are not going to go right for The King on this trip. Events may be delayed, and/or there may be last minute changes, and/or things will happen over which The King has no control. These may be small changes or they may be bigger, visible changes, but they will irritate The King and he will have no control over how and when they occur.
The energy from this card can go in two ways. The first is that The King is unable to go on the trip and there is a last minute change to send Prince William instead (very last minute). The second is that The King goes on this trip and faces multiple petty inconveniences - connections being delayed, weather closing planned events, transport breaking down - things like that which, while minor in themselves, can build up and make you tired and irritated and uncomfortable because your routine is thrown off.
I'm not getting any damage to his reputation or anything like that. This card is all about things going wrong that are beyond The King's ability to control.
Conclusion: The overall energy of this reading is of wanting to act and not being able to act, of things going wrong that are beyond The King's control. The big event that would align with the energy is The King being unable to go on the trip due to health reasons and having to pull out at the last minute. Smaller events would be Harry making a nuisance of himself, being in an unpleasant situation where he wants to act but politeness forces him into smiling inaction, or small inconveniences such as travel delays, weather issues, things breaking down, and other minor inconveniences.
We may not see what has gone wrong behind the scenes (or we might see it, depending on how big the vent is), Unfortunately, the energy is of a trip that The King wants to go on, very much, but if he does go on it the trip turns from a pleasurable event into something that must be endured and that will not be looked back on with any great joy.
My advice would be to stay home and send Edward and Sophie instead, but I can see how that could be seen as an insult.
It is not going to be a great experience for The King, unfortunately.
READING TWO
Card Drawn: The Two of Swords in Reverse
The Two of Swords in Reverse is a card of having to decide between two evils where there is not right choice, the truth being revealed, or having hesitated over a decision for so long that someone else makes it for you. It could also be a choice that has not yet been made - The King is still deciding about something.
The energy here is of a decision being made for The King which he does not like, or The King having to make a decision where there is no right choice, only wrong choices, i.e. he does not like either of the choices he is given.
A decision is being made or is about to be made or needs to be made. That is the strongest energy of this card. Along with that is an energy of distaste or dislike - whatever decision is made, The King is not going to be happy about it, however good a face he puts on it in public.
There is also a small but strong energy that says if The King does not make this decision soon, it will be taken out of his hands and someone else will make it for him.
The Queen of Wands in Reverse
This could be a fire sign person, particularly and Aries, who is involved in the decision above or the decision is about them.
However, the strongest energy of this card is not of a person but of a situation. The Queen of Wands is someone who is warm, creative, charismatic, social, the life of the party, in the spotlight - and in the reverse, the chance to be all those things - to go out and meet people and charm them and enjoy yourself - is being taken away.
If The King is expecting good times on this trip, it is not going to happen.
In the reverse, The Queen of Wands is a person or situation which is demanding, bullying, temperamental, jealous and selfish. The King may have to deal with people who are overly this way on his trip, or he may find himself in situations that occur because someone is being demanding, bullying, temperamental etc. and he has to deal with that in the best possible way.
There are two energies in this card. One is of the spotlight being taken away from The King, of him not being able to go out and meet people and charm them as he had planned. The other is dealing with people or situations or situations caused by people who are demanding, jealous, temperamental etc. This second energy is vey similar to the energy as in The Kinga of Swords reversed card in the first reading..
Conclusion: A decision has to be made, preferably by The King, but if he does not make it then someone else will make it for him. From his perspective, it is a decision between two evils - there is no right answer - but I think that other people may see the decision as having one right answer that The King is reluctant to accept. This decision could be about The King suddenly losing the spotlight (i.e. pulling out of this trip), or it could be about a person or persons, or a situation created by them, that involves bullying, jealousy, temperamental displays, etc.
Anon: Andrew Lownie is saying all sorts of things. He claims QEII was senile in her final years and that was demonstratively not true.
Could be the beginning of a narrative to blame QEII for things that happened (or didn't) towards the end, particularly with regards to Harry and Meghan. Or maybe it's a ploy to gain sympathy for her, then use her memory to make the public accept some unpalatable things the palace is about to do or say.
Hi Nonny,
That is a very plausible idea. I never thought of that. Thank you!
Such behaviour would be absolutely appalling imo, but I can see it happening, unfortunately.
"interaction with other people will not force [Charles & Camilla] to be aware of and correct or hide their bad behaviour." I agree Charles and Camilla are not good people. I would add I do think C&C become aware about their bad behavior when confronted with poll numbers but have no desire to change their behavior. I think you read previously Camilla is frustrated people continue to see her as "the other woman" despite becoming queen. But yes, I concur C&C are not as narcissistic as Meghan is.
Hi Nonny,
That could be the case. The King has shown that he will change his actions when heckled and confronted by the government (i.e. Andrew), but I am not aware of him doing so at any other time.
What I meant by that comment is that for most of us we go out, we interact with other people, and by their reaction to us we get feedback on our behaviour (good, bad, it is their problem as other people don't mind it, etc). The King appears to have lived his life surrounded by yes-men, so that feedback is missing, and he doesn't have to interact and get along with people on a daily basis like the rest of us do, so that impetus/mechanism to monitor/pull back on/change behaviour that is not met with approval is missing (for example, imagine The King going into a 9 to 5 job every day and how he would cope being in that job, and how his work mates would cope with him). I think the same is true of Queen Camilla - she does not have to work and so she can exist in an echo chamber of supportive friends and family. Hence the comment about no interaction with other people to force them to correct or hide their bad behaviour. (A long explanation just in case it wasn't clear in the first place)
I agree that both of them are sensitive to public opinion and want to be popular on the polls, they just never change their behaviour to one that would boost their numbers, either from disinclination or from thinking that PR will fix the problem, when it clearly doesn't.
Were KC3 and QC the original Harry and Meghan but just hid it better (or showed more intelligence in playing the long game)? KC3 and QC want to present themselves as good people but when you look at all the people they've disrespected in their families, that presentation rings hollow. Once people saw who they really were, they couldn't unsee it. For some reason KC3, QC, Harry and Meghan still think a magical piece of PR will make them seem like the saviors/saints/A-Listers they dream of being.
Hi Nonny,
I don't think that King Charles or Queen Camilla are as far on the narcissistic scale as Meghan is. I think they both display some narcissistic traits, perhaps more predominantly than other people do (we all have some narcissistic traits and that is a good thing), but I think they are also capable of love and concern for others, although perhaps in a limited way, and Meghan is not capable of doing that imo.
I don't think of either King Charles or Queen Camilla as good people, just to make that clear. I see them as deeply flawed people who have no interest in correcting their faults and who have a life that is privileged enough that interaction with other people will not force them to be aware of and correct or hide their bad behaviour.
I can see echoes and shadows of Harry and Meghan in King Charles and Queen Camilla, very clearly, but I can also see care and concern for others in the pair, which Meghan and now Harry are lacking imo. (Camilla clearly cares for her children, grandchildren and dogs, as she wore their names on her coronation robe instead of symbols of the UK, and The King cares for Camilla, his siblings, his children, his nieces and nephews, and his mother - yes, I think he will always put himself first, but I also think he gives the rest of them as much care and concern as he is capable of giving them).
Harry used to care somewhat for others, I think, but now his attention is fixed solely on himself and perhaps his wife and kids, while if Meghan has ever cared for anyone except herself I will be very much surprised (i also doubt that she sees other people as people - I think she sees them as tools to get her what she wants and has no more feeling for them than you would for a hammer or a screwdriver).
How we all have narcissistic traits: https://psychcentral.com/disorders/narcissistic-personality-disorder/narcissistic-traits
Celta, I'm surprised but not shocked that "people in the know" are now coming forward to reveal the truth that King Charles III and Camilla had started their affair right at the beginning of Charles marriage to Diana (and not in 1986). I get it why people are now talking about what they knew/heard QE2 say for her 100th birthday but do you have an inkling why people are beginning to come forward about Charles and Camilla while they're still alive? Thank you! :)
Hi Nonny,
On a base level, I suspect it is to make money. The focus in on Her Late Majesty and all things royal at the moment, so it is a good time to monetise any memories or secrets you have about the BRF.
Also. what can King Charles do about it? If he sues the person, he drawing more attention to the issue. He isn't doing anything about Harry and Meghan attacking the monarchy, so that may make people feel safer about saying things against him.
As well, Her Late Majesty is not alive to be upset about things like that any longer, so people no longer have to keep quiet out of protectiveness (not wanting to hurt her) or out of not wanting to upset the public because they upset her.
Hello Celta! Harry bullying his father anon here! The comment as I read it was that Harry was actually bullying his father. Not emotional blackmail but like physically in his father's face, shouting, being physically aggressive, etc. That kind of bullying. We've all seen examples of 20-some year old Harry restrained from having fights with the paparazzi outside of nightclubs. But yeah, I'd agree that would be karma for Charles be bullied by Harry in return for bullying his mother, the Queen.
Hi Nonny,
Oh, that makes sense. I've heard stories of Harry yelling at his father over the phone and being verbally aggressive to anyone who said No to him. That tracks with his other behaviour, as you have pointed out. It's not a nice way to treat your parent, to say the least.
When it comes to behaviour like this I usually ask myself where the person would have learnt the behaviour. In the case of Harry, I suspect the apple did not fall far from the tree, and he mirrors the worst behaviour of one or both of his parents.
Andrew Lownie is saying all sorts of things. He claims QEII was senile in her final years and that was demonstratively not true. I have ask why he is now making all these assertions?
Hi Nonny,
I don't follow the man, so I have no idea. Maybe he thinks now is the time to make more money from his claims?
I don't think Harry and Meghan's trip down under was as financially successful as they have been bragging in the press. Even a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan admitted to the Telegraph that “They’re barely breaking even" in Australia with their speaking fees. Harry even seemed aggressive saying to the TV film crews "we're part of the royal family, get used to it" aka half in/half out but I wonder if that aggression is a cover for desperation behind the scenes.
Hi Nonny,
I agree. I don't think it was financially successful at all. Ego wise, yes, and they were both obviously riding a high from all the attention and being treated as important people, but financially I'm more at the 'just breaking even' end of the scale.
Harry's aggression could very well be caused by desperation. I saw it more as a defiant 'We are doing this and you can't stop us, so bow down and worship us' statement, but it could very well be driven by the knowledge that if they don't succeed at this, they have no where else to turn (in their minds, as the idea of selling off their house and living as a normal person would never occur to them).
As a royal watcher, I should think of Camilla now when I read someone write in a op-ed or mention in a TV news story about "The Queen" but TBH to this day, whenever I hear "The Queen," I still think of Queen Elizabeth II and refer to Camilla by her name or when necessary, Queen Camilla. I don't think of Camilla when I hear the words "The Queen." Queen Elizabeth II earned that respect to be known as "The Queen." Camilla, IMO, has not.... yet and probably won't with petty articles saying "I won."
Hi Nonny,
Me too. 'The Queen' will always be Queen Elizabeth II to me, and Camilla will always be Charles's whore/mistress/partner in adultery, who he raised to a position of which she is totally undeserving.
The more Camilla is forced onto my attention, the more I see her as another version of Meghan (with just a few differences, namely the ability to play a long game without giving herself away and the ability to accept being number 2 on the path to being number 1).
Does King Charles know he's failing in his duty to the country by not holding Harry and Meghan accountable for violating the terms of the Sandringham agreement or do you think he knows and just doesn't care?
Hi Nonny,
I think he knows, and he doesn't want to make the effort to hold Harry and Meghan accountable, so he has justified it to himself in some way that this way is 'better' for the monarchy, when what he means is that it is easier for himself.
Celtic Cross @celticcrossanon - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
