people love to misconstrue transmisogyny as "transphobia for trans women" and then apply their poor understanding of gender to create the idea that every gender modality, especially transmasculinity, has its own version of transmisogyny
but not only does that false symmetry betray incredibly poor understanding of gender dynamics (next you'll be coming up with misogyny for men, oh wait that already happened, oh dear), but that's also just an incredibly poor understanding of the word "transmisogyny"
the word for transphobia faced by trans women is "transphobia" - it may shock many people to hear it, but trans women aren't cis, and are in fact no less trans than other trans people!
transmisogyny isn't specific random events that could happen to anyone but just by chance happen to trans women, transfems, and transfeminised people the most - transmisogyny is the ever-present dynamic where transfeminised people are disadvantaged relative to other people, even other trans people! when specific things are described as transmisogyny, that's because those are things that reinforce that status quo!!
so trying to come up with Transmisogyny For Men is trying to say that no, trans women (and transfeminised people) aren't disadvantaged relative to other trans people, refusing to acknowledge non-transfeminised privilege in a way that just so happens to perpetuate the status quo of exploiting trans women
funnily enough, transfeminised people are unhappy with that status quo! and funnily enough, lots of people who benefit from that part of it are actively trying to make sure it sticks around, while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge it! but of course, acknowledging it is infighting, or oppression olympics, or a psyop, or male socialisation, or some other entry in the endless list of ways to tell transfems to shut up