I just took this photo of my son to show him napping to my wife and
What. Dafuq.
I have a Galaxy S9 - super old, camera is okay at best.
The LIGHTING. The POSE. Like DAYUM. Renaissance painting much?
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic đŞŠ
sheepfilms
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Jules of Nature
h

No title available

â
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
No title available
RMH
hello vonnie
we're not kids anymore.
macklin celebrini has autism
Cosimo Galluzzi
Fai_Ryy

Origami Around
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belarus

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Indonesia

seen from Australia

seen from Peru

seen from Germany
seen from Venezuela

seen from Netherlands
seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Austria
seen from United States
@cidthecoatrack-blog
I just took this photo of my son to show him napping to my wife and
What. Dafuq.
I have a Galaxy S9 - super old, camera is okay at best.
The LIGHTING. The POSE. Like DAYUM. Renaissance painting much?
TIP:
This holiday season, if you know someone who likes house plants,
DON'T
get them a houseplant. DO NOT.
instead, get them a NICE, MEDIUM-LARGE, AESTHETIC, BOTTOM-DRAINING, INDOOR
POT.
that is what they want. that is what they dream of. ok? thats what will be most useful and appreciated. in fact, if you can, get them a CUTE MATCHING SET. OF POTS!!!! NOT PLANTS, POTS!!!!!!!!
they may be more excited initially about the plant. that is true. but a pot is a gift that they will go home and use to upsize one of their already beloved houseplants, and every time they look at it they will remember how much they appreciate you.
HOUSEPLANT:
- they already have so many
- needs to be watered
- takes up window space
- comes in a pot thats already too small, needs to be upsized, costing money
- can die
AESTHETIC POT
- lets them care for an existing plant they own
- they will be grateful every time they see it in their home
- does not take up window space not already occupied by a plant
- can be wrapped without dying or spilling dirt everywhere
This is definitely targeted at me re my wife. Got her pots as an anniversary present, she loves it.
You are a bad person if you vote for Trump. He doesn't give a shit about you. He just wants your votes.
Kamala on the other hand gives a shit about everyone. She is for the people. Vote for her. She knows what she's doing.
âThe GOP hasnât won the White House by majority vote, as mentioned, since 1988. And the two Republican presidents prior to Bush Sr., Nixon and Reagan, both chose to engage in naked treasonâNixon blowing up LBJâs Vietnam peace deal, and Reagan getting the Iranians to hold the U.S. hostages, respectivelyâto gain the White House. Republican leaders and the billionaires who own them know that if they lose this election in a blowout, it might be years before they can again climb to power, particularly if the Harris administration is successful in rebuilding the American middle class thatâs been gutted so badly by Reaganomics. Theyâre desperate, and, as anybody whoâs ever cornered a rat knows, desperate also means dangerous: Anything goes. The days immediately following November 5 will probably be insane. The Harris campaign says theyâre aware of this, as is Marc Elias. The rest of America needs to know the scheme too. Forewarned, after all, is forearmed, and one key to the GOP pulling this scam off will be public opinion. We canât let them have that advantage.â
â For Trump, November 5 Is When the Election Starts
DO NOT LOSE HOPE
VOTE BLUE
I DO NOT CARE WHAT THE POLLS SAY
GET UP AND VOTE
IF WE ALL TRY, WE CAN DO THIS.
đđđđđ
Why the 2024 elections won't be stolen
Things have certainly taken a turn for the positive lately in the political world. Democrats are casually raising nine figures of donations a week, over and over. Polls, for whatever they're worth, have gone from grim to great at the top of the ticket. Recent elections have shown Democratic priorities winning big in swing states, rejecting GOP-authored Constitutional amendments by 15 points in Wisconsin just last week. Everything is suddenly pointing to some major wins.
So, needless to say, we need a new reason to panic. And that's been "None of this matters, because Trump and his allies are going to just steal the election!"
Let's break this down, just as the title says:
Why the 2024 elections won't be stolen:
The short answer is that every tactic being floated was already tried in 2020 - when Trump was in office, when Republicans had more control over election certification in swing states, when the same six conservative Supreme Court Justices were on the Court, and when Trump had his people in the Department of Justice. They all failed.
Let's take a closer look at some of the more panic-inducing theories:
"Republicans will refuse to certify the election results!" If that happens, states have ways of forcing them to certify. Rogue officials can be ordered to certify by the courts, face fines or prison time for refusing to certify, and even be removed from office. Notice how in these stories, election deniers talk a good game about overturning results until they're staring down potential prison time.  See pg. 8-9 of this document for more examples - the whole document outlines effective legal remedies for refusals to certify quite well.
"Republicans will use the courts to overturn the election!" No, they won't.  Republicans filed 62 lawsuits challenging the results of the 2020 elections, and lost every last one. They got one temporary victory in Pennsylvania that was ultimately overturned by the State Supreme Court (and, fun fact, that judge was defeated when she ran for PA Supreme Court in 2023. Voters don't like this stuff). What's more, since 2020, Democrats have gained control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, the Michigan Supreme Court, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Arizona Secretary of State's and Attorney General's offices, and the Nevada Secretary of State's office. And that's before we get to the 205 (and counting!) federal judges appointed by Joe Biden. Trump's going to have to win these lawsuits with a much less friendly bunch of officials in charge.
"Trump's Supreme Court will just hand him the election!"Â See above. The same six conservative judges were on the Court in 2020, and they tossed every one of his lawsuits. Now Trump's not the incumbent and doesn't have the resources of the Department of Justice at his fingertips, either.
"Republicans will use Congress to overthrow the election results!"  I'd like to introduce you to the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022. This expedites any lawsuits around certifying the election in case local officials want to gum up the system, clarifies that courts have the power to overrule attempted steals by corrupt Governors, and limits the grounds that the House and Senate can use to throw out results. It's much harder than before - and if we can win the House and Senate, it'll be impossible.
"But I heard Georgia's elections board is going to ruin everything!" I'll leave aside the fact that Dems can win the House, Senate, and Presidency without Georgia for a moment, and point out that actually, they won't ruin everything. They might claim irregularities in the results and try to gum up the certification process - so we take them to court and make them certify. Using that expedited process in the Electoral Count Act of 2022, of course, and federal judges who are used to dealing with this nonsense from 2020. They might suppress the vote through closing polling places and purging voter registrations - well, they've done that for decades, and we still beat them in 2020 and 2022. The big theme of this is that when it comes to voter suppression, you can beat it by getting out the vote. We've got lawyers who are ready for nonsense.
Why your posts and comments about it are the real problem:
If people think their vote isn't going to count, why would they bother voting? They certainly won't canvass or phonebank, things we need to do if we're going to win. People won't take part, or give it their all, if they think it's all for nothing.  If enough of our voters get discouraged and don't vote, or don't encourage others, Trump won't have to steal anything - he'll just win. And that'll trickle down to other important races. I can already say I've had to talk people out of dropping phonebank shifts because of fears that races will just be stolen.
There's nothing average people can do. That doesn't mean there's no solution - Kamala Harris and the DNC have hired an enormous, seasoned legal team to fight attempts to steal the election. But if you're not one of those lawyers, you can't do much to help. And people know that. So it makes them feel hopeless and check out in general.
Dealing with misinformation takes time. I'll refrain from making cracks about the length of this post and simply say that I'd rather be sharing how to register to vote, or how to volunteer for candidates in swing districts. The only thing you can't get back in politics is time, and we'd all rather spend that time on making sure we win.
"Just sharing information" and "I feel anxious about this" aren't valid reasons to post this stuff. Period. Your 'information' does nothing except make people less likely to vote or volunteer, and you're not going to help your anxiety by posting - in fact, you're going to spin yourself up even more, and drag others down with you. The solution for political anxiety is a) talking to a mental health professional who's qualified to help you, and b) taking action. Political anxiety comes from a lack of agency over something important, like an election. But you do have agency and can help win. Not by posting, not by making snappy comments online, but by talking to voters and helping Democrats win. If you're worried that your vote will be stolen, read this post again. It won't. But if we lose, it won't matter.
Feel free to share this post anywhere. We can win - not just for President, but also the Senate, the House, state government, local offices, and ballot measures. We can build a better America together, and the GOP can't steal it from us. It's our effort, our hope, and our strength that can win any election, and bring about the world we want to live in. Shake off the lies, and use the next eleven weeks to work for democracy, together.
Nervous for this American election, if youâre in the States, itâs your duty to deny Trump this election at all costs.
I am an elections clerk.
I give up two days of the year to be paid less than MA minimum wage (more than US minimum wage) to keep a polling place open for 15 hours. I watch my warden set up the ballot box. I make sure that observers have a place to sit and don't invade the privacy of voters. I make sure the AutoMark is functional. I tell little kids that they can watch their parents vote but can't tell them how to vote. I make sure that I can hear the inspectors repeat back the information proving that they're checking off the correct person on the ballot-received list. I give people "I Voted" stickers and tell them to remind their neighbors to vote.
At the end of the night, the warden and I print out the unofficial results, sign them, and post them for observers. I fill in the tally sheets and hand-count ballots that the machine couldn't read.
And, above all, I make sure no-one in my polling place is trying to coerce another person's vote.
And I am always sad each election because people don't think their vote matters and I might get 10-30% of registered voters turning up.
Your vote matters. If it weren't important for you to vote, I wouldn't be making my little corner of my little purple city safe for you to vote in.
And if the guy who wants to take away your voting rights becomes President, your only hope is that the people in Congress will stop him - and they're on the ballot too.
(There are a bunch of important downballot things in MA this year, BTW. Primaries for those are in September.)
Jimmy Carter, who turned 100 recently, said that he just wanted to live long enough to vote for Kamala Harris.
Yesterday, early voting opened in Georgia, and among the first-day voters was former president Jimmy Carter, casting his vote.
I got unexpectedly emotional about this.
Just an aside...in 2020, the first-day voting in Georgia set a state record with 136,000 voters. Guess how many people voted early in Georgia yesterday?
328,000.
If you vote in North Carolina, you're going to see this on your ballot. Looks pretty straightforward, right?
But it's a trap placed by the GOP. âŹď¸âŹď¸âŹď¸
Voting "For" this referendum will remove the phrase "and every person who has been naturalized" from this section on voter eligibility in the NC constitution. This could place the future voting rights of about 400,000 naturalized US citizens in the state in jeopardy.
Just a reminder - it's already illegal for non-citizens to vote! There's no evidence that this happens in significant numbers anywhere in the country, and North Carolina has restrictions in place against it happening at all, like the voter ID law that's now in effect.
(The voter ID law disproportionately affects POC, as well as transgender voters, both of whom are more likely to vote Democratic as well as lack the needed ID, but that's another post.)
Voting "Against" on this measure will leave the state constitution unchanged.
Here's the whole bill (PDF): https://dashboard.ncleg.gov/api/Services/BillSummary/2023/H1074-SMBK-89(sl)-v-2
I was legit about to reblog something before I remembered I was scrolling through my own page.
Dear God I wish. Wouldn't that have been something.
"x has been done before" no experience is unique. all art is born out of connection. rejoice in being part of something bigger than yourself
To repeat a now popular phrase that is pertinent:
"Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree?" Is the same energy. (Not finishing the quote because I don't remember the exact wording and don't want to botch it. Which is a shame, because the rest of the quote is what fits so perfectly here.)
> The college I attended was small and very LGBT friendly. One day someone came to visit and used the word âgayâ as a pejorative, as was common in the early 2000s. A current student looked at the visitor and flatly said, âwe donât do that here.â The guest started getting defensive and explaining that they werenât homophobic and didnât mean anything by it. The student replied, âIâm sure thatâs true, but all you need to know is we donât do that here.â The interaction ended at that point, and everyone moved on to different topics. âWe donât do that hereâ was a polite but firm way to educate the newcomer about our culture. [âŚ]
> It turns out talking about diversity, inclusion, and even just basic civil behavior can be controversial in technical spaces. I donât think it should be, but I donât get to make the rules. When Iâm able Iâd much rather spend the time to educate someone about diversity and inclusion issues and see if I can change how they see the world a bit. But I donât always have the time and energy to do that. And sometimes, even if I did have the time, the person involved doesnât want to be educated.
> This is when I pull out âwe donât do that here.â It is a conversation ender. If you are the newcomer and someone who has been around a long time says âwe donât do that hereâ, it is hard to argue. This sentence doesnât push my morality on anyone. If they want to do whatever it is elsewhere, Iâm not telling them not to. Iâm just cluing them into the local culture and values. If I deliver this sentence well it carries no more emotional weight than saying, âin Japan, people drive on the left.â âWe donât do that hereâ should be a statement of fact and nothing more. It clearly and concisely sets a boundary, and also makes it easy to disengage with any possible rebuttals.
> Me: âYou are standing in that personâs personal space. We donât do that here.â > Them: âBut I was trying to be nice.â > Me: âAwesome, but we donât stand so close to people here.â
> Them: Tells an off-color joke. > Me: âWe donât do that here.â > Them: âBut I was trying to be funny.â > Me (shrugging): âThat isnât relevant. We donât do that here.â
I really really do want to endorse this. Making a personâs behavior about capital-M Morality is a great way to get people to dig in their feet and escalate situations. By going âHey, that behavior doesnât fit in this context.â it removes a ton of the resentment and toxicity on both sides of the interaction.
Power move: be a newbie and say it to an old-timer. Watch them try to justify, repeat what you said, and watch their head implode.
> The college I attended was small and very LGBT friendly. One day someone came to visit and used the word âgayâ as a pejorative, as was common in the early 2000s. A current student looked at the visitor and flatly said, âwe donât do that here.â The guest started getting defensive and explaining that they werenât homophobic and didnât mean anything by it. The student replied, âIâm sure thatâs true, but all you need to know is we donât do that here.â The interaction ended at that point, and everyone moved on to different topics. âWe donât do that hereâ was a polite but firm way to educate the newcomer about our culture. [âŚ]
> It turns out talking about diversity, inclusion, and even just basic civil behavior can be controversial in technical spaces. I donât think it should be, but I donât get to make the rules. When Iâm able Iâd much rather spend the time to educate someone about diversity and inclusion issues and see if I can change how they see the world a bit. But I donât always have the time and energy to do that. And sometimes, even if I did have the time, the person involved doesnât want to be educated.
> This is when I pull out âwe donât do that here.â It is a conversation ender. If you are the newcomer and someone who has been around a long time says âwe donât do that hereâ, it is hard to argue. This sentence doesnât push my morality on anyone. If they want to do whatever it is elsewhere, Iâm not telling them not to. Iâm just cluing them into the local culture and values. If I deliver this sentence well it carries no more emotional weight than saying, âin Japan, people drive on the left.â âWe donât do that hereâ should be a statement of fact and nothing more. It clearly and concisely sets a boundary, and also makes it easy to disengage with any possible rebuttals.
> Me: âYou are standing in that personâs personal space. We donât do that here.â > Them: âBut I was trying to be nice.â > Me: âAwesome, but we donât stand so close to people here.â
> Them: Tells an off-color joke. > Me: âWe donât do that here.â > Them: âBut I was trying to be funny.â > Me (shrugging): âThat isnât relevant. We donât do that here.â
I really really do want to endorse this. Making a personâs behavior about capital-M Morality is a great way to get people to dig in their feet and escalate situations. By going âHey, that behavior doesnât fit in this context.â it removes a ton of the resentment and toxicity on both sides of the interaction.
Cave Johnson here. It's come to my attention that a few of our subjects are something called "trendsetters".
*garbled phone talking*
What was that? ...Go-getters? Tram ....blenders? Not even close? Then what did the hell did you-
Speak up goddammit or I'll hook your vocal cords up to the loudspeaker!
...They're what?
Why would-
Oh goddammit.
Cave Johnson here. It's come to my attention that a few of our recently acquired test subjects are something called "transgender", and that some of you morons have been trying to scare 'em outta the testing facility.
Well guess what? We here at aperture couldn't care less about whatever the hell's going on in this evolutionary dumpster fire of a human body we've all got. So why should anyone else?
I don't give a damn about what's in your pants unless the next million dollar scientific breakthrough happenened to appear in your crotch out of thin air.
In fact, I'm starting to think you all could learn a thing or two from these "transcenders" you seem to hate so much.
You know who they are? They're god damn scientists that's what. And we could use a few more of those around here.
They're gleefully ingesting chemical concoctions full of god knows what every day just to move some body fat around while the rest of you couldn't even look at the bottle of quantum ibuprofen the medical team cooked up last week without wetting yourselves.
You wouldn't know science if it broke into your house, irradiated it, and turned all the furniture inside out, so quit your whining and move to the next test chamber.
I swear to whatever god or lack thereof you believe in I'll die on this hill and have my last request be that the medical staff beat you to death with my corpse.
So get off your god damn high horse. You don't even have a single scientific bone in your body. I assure you, we checked.
Chef's kiss. Perfection. I would pay a legally-questionable amount of money to hear JK Simmons actually narrate that.