One Nice Bug Per Day
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
h
dirt enthusiast
Jules of Nature
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
Janaina Medeiros
NASA
⁂
Discoholic 🪩
oozey mess
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
🪼
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
shark vs the universe
RMH
d e v o n
@theartofmadeline
Andulka
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Paraguay
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Israel
seen from Greece
seen from China
seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@contractuallycursed
Anon, not posting your last Asks for reasons already stated — if you plan on dropping locations or searching for anyone's house online, this is not your blog.
This applies to everyone who sees this. We are open to chatting, if you come to us via @contractuallycurseddm or the e-mail address in bio, but we are not posting anyone's house, address, or any information of this kind.
Thanks for understanding, everyone! <3
— A.A. & I.A.
I can't believe I paid for overpriced tickets to see a bald man and his beautiful wife have their kids taken by child protection services
I've seen MECY.
The tickets weren't overpriced, though.
— A.A.
A Romanian premiere is expected in the fall (september or october), but details are not known yet, unlike the others. // I thought he wasn't available in the fall? Per his agent?
We are not going to get into the whole Comic Con Connections debate again — that was more than anyone can handle.
Now, as far as we've been told, nothing official has been announced. Cristian said that premieres in France and Norway are set for August and they are interested in a Romanian premiere in the fall (that both Sebastian and Renate should attend).
Thank you again nonnie for the info and if anyone else wants to hop in and share anything more, the inbox is open.
— A.A.
Did you notice how the blind items about him just ✨magically✨ stopped after this pregnancy bs..
Clearly she used those to mess with his image, and now with a public pregnancy (that she’s faking, in my opinion) that’s the biggest thing she can hold over him rn.. so there’s no need for blind items of him with hookers..
The hookers blind items always come out at just the right time.
I don't believe they "magically stopped", but they aren't objectively needed anymore. There is nothing major going on right now, except a few photoshoots and movie announcements.
"Fjord" is supposedly premiering in Europe in August — alongside another movie we know — so let's wait and see.
— A.A.
According to a recent interview of director Cristian Mungiu, "Fjord" will have official premieres across Europe in August. He mentioned France and Norway, but it could be more countries, supposedly.
A Romanian premiere is expected in the fall (september or october), but details are not known yet, unlike the others.
"Fjord" stars Renate Reinsve and Sebastian Stan are expected to attend said premieres. Cristian mentioned that the Romanian one will be scheduled based on their availability, as well.
Thank you Anon for sending this and the translation in!
— A.A.
Ugh I miss the old days when we had anti blogs with balls. They posted everything and didn’t get hung up on stupid shit. Emily knows fans follow the account and that things get leaked. Let’s use our heads a bit and realize she continues to post stuff…
I believe we can all agree that the pictures were shared with the intent to be taken and spread across social media — Annabelle posing on the same boat in the same outfit only less than two days later proved it.
The need for attention and creating a narrative is clearer than day.
In this context, I believe that it is better to just let them make a fool out of themselves and remember that nobody outside the fandom actually knows who they are or care about their whereabouts.
I believe it is less about "balls" and more about priorities, because the pictures were posted by the people who are actually interested in the agenda, they were never just a thought.
— A.A.
Can you post all the leaked photos? I think there are more besides the one in the yellow dress 😭
We have seen the pictures but we aren't going to post them, for the same reason we were hesitant to "confirm" the other one — we can't properly confirm (or deny) the source.
They were posted, to some extent, on different blogs and on Annabelle's fanpages. You can check them out there, I believe.
— A.A.
Nonnie, come off Anon.
— A.A.
I believe there is definitely a belly there — the belly that we saw at the Women In Motion Awards and the Chopard event, not the belly that supposedly defies designer Georgia Hardinge's entire brand and career but also basic anatomy.
Okay mod let me ask you a question this yellow dress shows that her belly is much bigger than it was a few nights ago at the awards ceremony I mean do you think it's possible the dress is making it look bigger I mean I'm trying to give this woman the benefit of the doubt but it looks so much bigger I just came home and saw these pictures and I am so confused more confused than I've ever been thank you
I already answered your Ask, I believe, love. In the meantime, though, I was helped out with a better look at this whole situation, so I will add a little to that.
While I will not deny there being a bump — come on, we've seen the woman like three days ago? — I don't believe that this time she is doing anything to enhance it's size or make it look any different than it did a couple of days ago.
This is going to sound like I am defending her, but let's look at the pictures I gathered, shall we?
First of all, let's take another side by side look at the dress.
I think that by seeing the whole length and the model posing similarly, you can also understand what I am talking about a little better.
There is a pattern that the belly does not appear to break or disturb in any way.
In the picture, you can also see Annabelle's leg. I could argue and say that the supposed belly is turned fully towards the woman in red, while her leg and chest are not, which would be an anomaly at last.
I chose, though, to look for a few more pictures of Annabelle in a similar position, that I will link below.
Let's start with Annabelle (and the father of her child) attending the Kering Women in Motion Awards earlier this week.
While her leg is not that far in front of her body, her upper body is placed similarly — at least, her chest is. And you can see easily where her belly falls and what is the exact curve between her chest and bump.
Next, I found this picture of Annabelle attending "The Apprentice" Premiere at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival.
Her pose here is so much closer to the truth, and the dress is also tight enough to see the natural curve of her body, but also where her stomach naturally falls while posing this way.
It doesn't naturally fall opposed to her left hip or the seam of her dress, does it?
And lastly, I chose the infamous singular picture of Annabelle attending the Saint Laurent MET Gala After-Party earlier this month, where her dress was a similar fit to the Georgia Hardinge one, and a similar material that allows us to see where her belly naturally falls.
The most important part that I noticed now with the sight of the entire dress is that you can see the seams of the dress. Right behind the glass of whatever Miss Wallace chose to drink, you can see her armpit and then the seam that falls straight down.
Now, I don't know much about pregnant bodies, I told you, but I think that if your belly is on the opposite side of your hip — so on the side of your body — you should maybe go and see your doctor and not drink on a yacht in St. Tropez. No matter what your drink of choice is.
That is all that I wanted to share and I will consider ending the discussion regarding this particular corner of a picture here, because the pictures say more than we can.
While I agree that this pregnancy has been an entire Grand Prix, and it's been hard to keep up, it seems, even for Miss Wallace — remember the green cardigan, don't you? — I don't believe that this was any trick to make the belly look any bigger or any smaller.
The belly is there, I believe, just not the way people believe, and that is okay!
— A.A.
Let me ask you a question mod about this yellow dress picture I just came home and saw it and I am so confused is it the dress that's making her belly look bigger because it looks a lot bigger than it did when she was wearing the pink dress at the fashion show I'm just wondering I just need a point of view.
According to the designer and the brand's official website, the dress is true to size.
Naturally, a true to size dress should not be able to create such an illusion, especially not when the design is made specifically to enhance a slimmer silhouette.
But that is naturally and well, Miss Wallace is an enigma.
— A.A.
Apparently, Emily posted the picture
I don't personally follow Emily, so I can't confirm that, I am sorry.
Can anyone confirm? Do we have any proof? I've only seen it brought up on Tumblr, which is why I am still treating it as fun and giggles and I suggest you do the same until we have a confirmation. Not even those who follow Emily and Co. and who have been vocal about it shared it on different platform.
In the meantime, if anyone wants to share anything... @contractuallycurseddm is always open!
— A.A.
I am so confused. Is the belly gone again?
I believe there is definitely a belly there — the belly that we saw at the Women In Motion Awards and the Chopard event, not the belly that supposedly defies designer Georgia Hardinge's entire brand and career but also basic anatomy.
— A.A.
This is the last artificial intelligence meets the Wallace-Stain Protocol intervention we will be having for the next period of time.
Thank you Anon for sending this in — it should explain better how the construction of that dress works like.
— A.A.
i know i'm a weirdo with chatgpt. but it's kinda supposed to look more like this https://prnt.sc/rjt3E3a6dTMx
I am not going to say weirdo, but I am going to say that Annabelle Wallace is not worth water and resources for all this, babe.
I believe that the image is close to reality, though.
Georgia Hardinge is known for this style of construction — we have seen Annabelle wear a similar dress before, and I have also linked several other examples of women wearing comparable designs.
The pleating is intentionally tighter around the waist, where the circular pattern curves inward to accentuate the silhouette and create definition through fabric placement rather than structured tailoring. Right below the midsection, the pleats begin to loosen and fall more naturally toward the hips.
Looking at the picture supposedly released today, the pleats visibly curve toward Annabelle’s right side. According to the construction of the dress itself, that curve is meant to accommodate the hip line, not the center of the stomach. The abdomen would naturally fall below the circular pleating pattern, rather than at the point where the concentric lines end.
— A.A.
the yellow dress has the following disclaimer on the website:
Fit: True to size. Waist has no stretch, check your waist measurement on our size guide.
oops
I think it is a known fact that most of the Georgia Hardinge dresses are not made of stretchy materials. Even the other styles that we've seen Annabelle wear throughout the last years — pictures below — seem pretty tight.
However, I don't really think that the fit is an issue. We've seen Annabelle's belly in multiple videos just earlier this week, it is nothing that sizing up wouldn't be able to cover.
The issue is not the size, but the pattern.
— A.A.
I don't get it. Its her hip? Her belly? Something else?
I cannot make assumptions — at least not until I can confirm a source for the picture and the context.
For now, all we can do is look at what is shown to us. A woman wearing a dress made by her best friend. But if you look at the dress pattern, I believe an answer is there.
— A.A.
— A.A.